Skip to main content

101-200 of 2,446 results for subject:Monarchy

Type

-
Early day motions (63)
+ Legislation (22) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (19) + Public bills (19)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (16)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (5)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (2,032)
-
Business questions (20)
-
Maiden speeches (6)
-
Oral answers to questions (102)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,817)
+ Parliamentary committees (26) + Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (40)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (18)
-
House of Commons papers (15)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (65) + Debates (37)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (29)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (4)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (18) + Oral statements (7)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (311)
-
Business questions (20)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Written questions (179)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (46) + Commons Briefing papers (41)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (5)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful for the kind things the noble Lord said to me, but the fact of the matter is that I do not know any of the leaders of my party. I do not know David Cameron—my noble friend Lord Cameron—or any of his successors. I simply will not...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

I do not accept that for one moment. The noble Earl is well known. His contributions are well known and valued—he must not undersell himself. The important thing is that there was an opportunity in 1999, when people left this House because they were hereditary Peers, for some to be...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord keeps mentioning the manifesto. Would he agree that, if I had a pound for every promise that had been in a manifesto from the Labour Party and the Conservative Party, I would be a billionaire?

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord must be happy that at least one manifesto commitment is being kept, and it is this one. We will deliver on it.

I conclude by saying that it is wrong to single out Peers for their contribution. All Peers have made a tremendous contribution to the work of...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Wolfson and the noble Lord, Lord Collins, for their contributions. I particularly express my thanks for another wonderful speech from my noble friend Lady Finn, who, to my mind, absolutely nailed it. I thank my noble friend Lord Blencathra in particular for...

Member
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc80-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord True

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to end the connection between the possession of a hereditary peerage and obtaining membership of the House of Lords.”

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c16
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the effect of Amendment 1 is to underline the purpose of this Bill as ending entry here by the hereditary principle, but which does not endorse the wholesale removal of colleagues who are already here. There thus falls to me the lamentable duty to open Committee on this...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc13-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

If I may: this is Committee. The noble Lord can come in. I am concluding my remarks, but I will answer him later. We have seen in recent days the nature of negotiation with a big stick. That is not the House of Lords way, nor is it the way...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in considering the purposes of this Bill, it is necessary to remind ourselves of the circumstances in which our hereditary colleagues continue to sit in your Lordships’ House. They are here because of an agreement which was reached in 1999 that they would continue to sit in your...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord, but I think he said “the late Lord Irvine”; I remind him that the noble and learned Lord is not late.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

I apologise, both to the Committee and to the noble and learned Lord. I am delighted to hear that he is still with us. I am most grateful to the Leader.

The noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, gave those undertakings as Lord Chancellor—an office which then occupied a rather higher...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc20-17
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know if I am alone in having a sense of fear and anxiety about the state of the world at the present time. The fact that we are debating ourselves when, at the other end of the Corridor, they are considering the issues of security...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc18-22
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, because I agree with his starting point, which is that we find ourselves as a nation in a more perilous position, arguably, than we have been in in my lifetime and, in those circumstances, the prospect...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc19-23
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord. As ever, he spoke with a lot of logic, and I agree with so much of what he said—not quite everything—as I have with so many other people.

I want to comment on only one or two issues that arose...

Member
Earl of Kinnoull (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc23-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I much enjoyed the speech of my noble friend Lord Forsyth, particularly when my name was mentioned and the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, started murmuring on his Back Benches. What is less well known is that the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, used to represent an important part of...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc24-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise somewhat reluctantly to speak as an elected hereditary who defends the hereditary principle—but we will debate that in response to my Amendment 3, not now. However, I also accept that, if our time is up and we are to leave this House, as I said at...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc26-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must admit that the thought of the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, representing my noble friend Lord Strathclyde has slightly set me aside for a moment. I was wondering which particular bit he represented. Was it the bit from the neck up, from the waist down or everything...

Member
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc24-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the comments that have been made and for the different tone from the noble Lord, Lord True, which I welcome. I will just say one thing. The noble Lord spoke about a passing political Executive. He will know, as I do, that that is...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc26-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords with long memories will recall that my arrival in this House was somewhat unusual and speaks directly to both parts of my noble friend’s amendment. As the then Minister for Energy, I was taking a Bill through a Commons Committee shortly before the 1992 general election...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc29-7
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord—I always enjoy listening to his entertaining contributions—but we are discussing a specific amendment at the moment. He is making comments on things we will come to later in considering other amendments. This seems to be a Second Reading speech. I do not...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c31
House
House of Lords

I am doing precisely that by talking about the hereditary principle and the removal of the hereditaries. Both are central to what I am speaking about. I gave my experience from the point of view of a hereditary, and I am now addressing the key point about the Bill being...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc29-31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think it is a little bit much for the noble Baroness to give my noble friend Lord Moynihan a hard time for making what she said was a Second Reading speech. The fact is that

we had Second Reading nearly three months ago—there is no reason for...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc31-2
House
House of Lords

I hate to intervene on noble Lords, but I do so because I do not like to be misrepresented by the noble Lord, or any other noble Lord in this House. I did not say that noble Lords have to pass the Bill before any discussions take place. I said...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

I am more than happy to agree with the noble Baroness on procedural shenanigans, which I must say I do not recognise at all over the course of the last few months. I am not doing any procedural shenanigans; I am actually replying to the noble Baroness, but I have...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Has the noble Lord finished his remarks, because I do not want to encourage him to go on at length? I wish to respond to the point about why Labour Members have not spoken, but is he wishing to get up again? I do not want to intervene on him,...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Feel free.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Well, I have been waiting to say this for a long time, but I have managed to keep quiet. It was nine years ago that I first brought in a Bill to end the system of by-elections, which, had it been enacted, would have substantially solved the problem—and I think...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc32-4
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord is correct, why did the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, use the words “binding in honour”?

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I cannot possibly interpret at this juncture the views of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine—I know that the noble Lord, Lord Howard, has resurrected him during this debate. I really do not know precisely why he used the wording, but I know the context in which that “agreement”...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the noble Lord giving way. Does he recognise Alastair Campbell’s book when he said that he was very astonished that Viscount Cranborne did the deal and that it was only going to end in tears for him?

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

One person asked me to answer for Viscount Cranborne and I am now expected to answer for Alastair Campbell. The noble Lord needs to ask my good friend Alastair Campbell about that, but I know the facts are precisely as I described. Please do not take my word for it;...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I totally understand why the noble Lord cannot be expected to answer for the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, or anyone else, but perhaps he could answer for himself. He is quite right—magnanimity in victory—that he has got what he was asking for. If he thought that it was...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

What has changed is that there was a general election, and this was a manifesto commitment. Broadly speaking, it is a good idea to obey manifesto commitments. The longer answer to the noble Lord’s question is that I was not the first to introduce such a Bill; Eric Lubbock was...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord, who should be a little more cheerful having achieved what he set out to do, not accept that there were many of us who were not in this House and therefore unable to support his Bill or otherwise?

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Order! I do not think that the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, was giving way; he had sat down. The time had already been exceeded under the rules of the Companion. In terms of the Companion, is it not time that the noble Lord, Lord True, indicated whether he was pressing...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want to make a comment. At the moment, the Prime Minister is on his feet at the other end, as the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, pointed out, talking about issues of national security and the defence of the nation. Our debate does not hold up terribly...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Hear, hear to that—I could not agree more with the Leader of the House. We should not be debating this at this time at all, and we are in risk of rendering ourselves irrelevant and foolish by debating these matters when things of far greater importance are going on. But...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, made reference to me. I want to put it on the record, because he has said it before, that the amount of time that I spoke during the debates on his Bill in 2018—a Bill which had six hours of debate—was under twice...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c36
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think it is right for me to intervene. I say to the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, who asked me for an apology, that I make no apology for carrying out the policy of my Government when I was a Government Minister. The policy of the Government was...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc36-8
House
House of Lords

It may be pedantic to point out that it was rejected in the other place by 277. I never said that it was not in the ability of this House to send back an amendment if it chose to do so. I pointed out what happened in the House of...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

If I may borrow a phrase from a more prominent person than I, did I really say that? The joys of social media and smartphones are very wonderful. I stand corrected by the noble Baroness, but the point remains that there resides great wisdom in this House and there remains...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Earl of Caithness

2: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Overview

This Act makes the House of Lords a second chamber whose membership is wholly nominated by the Prime Minister.”

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we might think that we know what most of the consequences of this Bill will be for the British constitution, but they are far from clear to anyone who does not take a close interest in these matters, and they are not to be found in the Bill...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc38-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I read this amendment with some surprise, because the noble Earl says that everybody is going to be nominated by the Prime Minister. I was not nominated by the Prime Minister and there remains, I think, 20% of this House who were not. As far as I know,...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c39
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to speak to the last amendment. I will say very quickly now that it needed a little bit inserted to say, “Also to remove the power of the Prime Minister to have total control over the membership of this House”.

I remember and was very involved...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc40-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, along with others, I share the concerns of my noble friend Lord Caithness, as I also much appreciate the comments of the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss.

As already indicated, the priority aim for a reformed House of Lords must be its quality of function as a revising...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc41-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Earl, Lord Dundee, has just indicated the difficulty of discussing some of the broader issues that this Bill raises when we have so many different groupings. I suggest, in the very constructive spirit of the noble Lord, Lord True, when he opened the debate on the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c41
House
House of Lords

On the question of groupings, I understand that the Opposition put forward some suggestions for groupings to the Government Whips’ Office at the end of last week, and they were rejected without even being looked at until the Government had put forward their own proposals. That is my understanding.

I think...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c42
House
House of Lords

The first four separate amendments seem to me to have a very natural linkage, and it would have been much more sensible to debate them in a group, for example.

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me carry on on the groupings that we have and on the speech in introducing his amendment of my noble friend—

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

We are on the second amendment of the day and this is the sixth speech from the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde. I think we can all draw our own conclusions.

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fancy that, if this Bill dealt with the expulsion of all Peers over 80, the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, would be a leading light in opposition to that legislation. I am simply carrying out my duty as a Member of this House to hold the Government to...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

I can respond in one sentence. The reason that I caved in on that amendment, on that particular day, is that we had already been rambling on for about an hour and a half on the subject and anything to shorten it was to my advantage. That principle could perhaps...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

My noble friend Lord Caithness is right to point out that the effect of this Bill is to make your Lordships’ House a second Chamber almost entirely nominated by the Prime Minister. I say “almost” because his amendment refers only to the Lords temporal; as noble Lords know, the Lords...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

In view of what my noble friend, Lord Strathclyde, and, indeed, the Minister have said, is there not a case for putting HOLAC on a statutory basis, as relating both to its existence and to its manner of appointment?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

My noble friend asks a very good question, but that is a question for a different group. The question of the House of Lords Appointments Commission is, rightly, worthy of a debate in a group of its own. If the noble Baroness wants to respond to my noble friend’s question...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc44-6
House
House of Lords

For clarification, the Government pray in aid their manifesto and talk about the grammar of where the full stop falls, but it is worth looking at their latest manifesto. In the same paragraph, where they talks about immediate modernisation and legislation to remove the right of hereditary Peers, they go...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c45
House
House of Lords

It is indeed. Whether the grammar matters or not, these are clearly linked, and as for those colleagues we are going to lose through this Bill, who were kept here as surety, as a reminder, to make sure that the deal was followed through, surely we owe it to them...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc45-7
House
House of Lords

It would be useful to know how this actually relates to the wording of the amendment.

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

I think very directly, because this is an amendment to remind your Lordships’ House and future Governments that the Bill gives Prime Ministers greater power than ever before to nominate people to this House, and the present Prime Minister, whom this will empower and embolden, has sent us, since he...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

The speaker’s own background is exactly the one that he is now criticising others for. He also has forgotten the people that Boris Johnson put in. So could we just have a little humility?

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

I draw the noble Baroness’s attention to my own amendment, which I hope has been brought forward in a spirit of humility, suggesting that there be a cap on the number of special advisers that Prime Ministers can nominate.

The reason I have tabled that amendment, and the one which...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we started the debate today with a conciliatory and constructive tone from the Front Benches, which I found optimistic and encouraging. I fear that things have gone pretty steeply downhill since that time, and they have also gone way off track from the amendments under discussion. I have...

Member
Lord Cromwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c48
House
House of Lords

I respectfully disagree with the noble Lord. I think this is about more than numbers; it is about a constitutional principle. It is right, as my noble friend Lord Caithness has done, to point out the powers that the Bill will give to the Prime Minister in the interim, and...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c48
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Earl for proposing his amendment. I will come back to the comments made in the debate, but basically the noble Earl seeks to put an overview of the Bill in the Bill. I make the same comment that I made to the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc48-50
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness the Leader of the House accept the arguments from the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, that if his Bill had

been passed we would now be left with 25 hereditaries? That would be a decent number and you would not need to get rid of them. Can...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c50
House
House of Lords

I do not always admire the noble Lord’s ingenuity, but I do on this occasion. I think the point the noble Lord was making was that had that been accepted at the time, we would not have any hereditary Peers, in effect, because all would be here as life Peers....

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c51
House
House of Lords

Is that “longer term” during this Parliament?

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c51
House
House of Lords

I do not know. It has to be when the policy is determined but I would certainly have thought that the second part of it, around participation and retirement, is something that we can look at quickly. If the House came to an agreement, it could be done quickly as...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc51-2
House
House of Lords

That is not fair to the Leader.

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is resisting that temptation but I say to him, as I say to all noble Lords, that I have always been open to discussions. But I need assurances, so when we see degroupings, filibustering and threats on different things, that does not give the confidence that allows...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness the Leader of the House for her reply. We have some useful additional information from her. However, I would take issue with her, just as she took issue with anybody who tried to misrepresent her in the debate. I did not...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

I do not accept that at all. There is no change whatever in the powers of the Prime Minister at that point. I have explained the process. I think the noble Earl is saying that it is not everybody in the House. Currently 88 Members are here because of their...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

As a result of this Bill, there will be a greater percentage of the House appointed by the Prime Minister than now.

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

Can I just finish? My point was that this could be abused. If I recall rightly the noble Baroness said, and I agree with her, that most Prime Ministers have behaved very responsibly, but on some occasions it has not been quite as we would have hoped. I am grateful...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc52-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Earl of Devon

3: Clause 1, page 1, line 1, at end insert—

“(A1) In section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 (exclusion of hereditary peers), at end insert “, except for a child or grandchild of the Sovereign”.”

Member's explanatory statement

This probing amendment invites the House to consider...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c53
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to speak to Amendment 3 in my name. It is a probing amendment aimed at focusing upon the hereditary principle in general, and its ongoing role within our constitution and this Parliament in the context of the sovereign in particular.

The Labour Party manifesto asserted...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc53-4
House
House of Lords

I too come from a long line of parents. My parents were the ones who were actually ploughing the lonely furrows that he referred to—probably on his ancestors’ lands. If he asks who will stand up for the monarch, I will, and my colleagues will. We all swore an oath...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c54
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his intervention. That is the point of this amendment, and I am very pleased to hear it. I look forward to the Front Benches from each of our parties repeating exactly the same point.

As I said, Sir Keir Starmer was bending his knee to...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c54
House
House of Lords

I do trust that the noble Earl is not suggesting that members of the Royal Family should participate in debates. That would be wholly disastrous.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c55
House
House of Lords

If the noble Viscount listens to my next paragraph, I will clarify that point.

I should also note, for the record, that we have a recent precedent for a grandchild of a sovereign seeking to join your Lordships’ House as an elected hereditary. In 2018, when I stood for a Cross-Bench...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c55
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak in support of the amendment from the noble Earl, Lord Devon. This Bill is about not just the future of hereditary Peers but the stability of our entire constitutional order. Hereditary Peers are not relics of feudal privilege, as the Government claim; they are a...

Member
Baroness Meyer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc55-6
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage first day. Clause 1 under consideration. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon; Lord Collins of Highbury; Lord Hermer
Answering member
Lord True; Baroness Finn; Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay; Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
Department
Attorney General; Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc12-81
House
House of Lords

An updated briefing paper on oaths of allegiance taken by senior office holders in the UK. This includes the Parliamentary Oath taken by MPs and peers and the judicial oath taken by judges.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
CBP-7515

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that public sector bodies use the King's cypher rather than Queen Elizabeth II’s cypher.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2024
Reference
14068
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to promote awareness of the (a) Commonwealth of Nations, (b) Monarchy and (c) Commonwealth realms in (i) schools in England.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Reform UK)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 November 2024
Reference
13120
House
House of Commons

I would be interested to see what amendments come forward, given my right hon. Friend’s remarks. There is a strong argument for having an expectation that if someone is appointed to the Lords, they do their job. That is the kind of amendment that even I, with my deep-rooted conservatism,...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c751
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right, and it is always good to have a mention of Bagehot in any constitutional debate. Bagehot draws the distinction between the dignified and the efficient parts of the

constitution, but I thought that my right hon. Friend was making an argument that the...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c751
House
House of Commons

Dignity and efficiency are not necessarily incompatible—my right hon. Friend personifies their marriage. He is right to say that there is something ugly about the idea of a Government of either party simply stuffing the House of Lords with their friends or donors. Let us be honest: that is not...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c752
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Shaun Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c752
House
House of Commons

No, I am going to finish now.

A vapid fascination with now—imagine that. Of course, those philosophers on the Labour Benches will know that “now” is an illusion, as now becomes then in an instant, does it not? Yet the politics of now have an extraordinary appeal for faint hearts and...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

Oh, please not! [Laughter.]

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

I know there are students of Proust littered among the saplings on the Labour Benches. If they are truly to become oaks and leave their acorns in the soil, they need to read Proust more. Proust said that

“the most deplorable prejudices have had their moment of novelty when fashion lent...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Filton and Bradley Stoke (Claire Hazelgrove) for such a passionate maiden speech. She will be an excellent representative for her constituency. It is a privilege to stand here to give my own as the first...

Member
Anneliese Midgley (Labour)
Type
Maiden speeches
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 cc753-5
House
House of Commons

It is a great privilege to follow such a moving and strong maiden speech by the hon. Member for Knowsley (Anneliese Midgley). I could tell by how she spoke with such passion about Knowsley that she will always be a fierce advocate for her constituents, and make sure that their...

Member
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 cc755-6
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is making a fantastic point. He will know that it was in the Tudor era that reform of the House of Lords started, when the majority of bishops were removed, leaving these 26. The Paymaster General made a point about reforms not having been properly continued...

Member
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons

Indeed, and I want to encourage the Paymaster General. He has the potential to be known as a great reformer of the Labour party—he will write books about himself in the future—but he needs to be brave. He needs to be bold. I know that he can persuade his friends...

Member
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons