Skip to main content

51-100 of 2,446 results for subject:Monarchy

Type

-
Early day motions (63)
+ Legislation (22) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (19) + Public bills (19)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (16)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (5)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (2,032)
-
Business questions (20)
-
Maiden speeches (6)
-
Oral answers to questions (102)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,817)
+ Parliamentary committees (26) + Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (40)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (18)
-
House of Commons papers (15)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (65) + Debates (37)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (29)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (4)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (18) + Oral statements (7)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (311)
-
Business questions (20)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Written questions (179)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (46) + Commons Briefing papers (41)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (5)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A briefing paper on the preparations for the Coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla, what took place on Coronation day and other events associated with the ceremony.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
28 April 2025
Reference
CBP-9789

My Lords, I rise to support the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Devon, which is very creative and imaginative. For anybody who thinks this is beside the point, I certainly would not want to press the issue too hard—it is somewhat absurd to suggest that the removal of...

Member
Lord Moore of Etchingham (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc56-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have bitten my tongue for the first two or three groups our Committee has considered, but I feel obliged to make a quick comment on the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Devon—and also because my gluteus maximus has gone to sleep.

We have a constitution, which...

Member
Viscount Thurso (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc57-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to say that, as the royal representatives and great offices of state—the Lord Great Chamberlain and the Earl Marshall—are being removed from the House, is it reasonable not to sever the Royal Family’s link entirely with the Floor of the House? I might draw the...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord is speaking to the amendment in the next group. While I am on my feet, I will say very quickly, because this has made me think of it, that if the King does get removed, we will end up with something very close to the...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will just make a couple of points. First, we are not abolishing hereditary Peers; we are abolishing the right of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. Secondly, 26 years ago we removed 667 hereditary Peers and as far as I can judge,...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

With that in mind, I invite the noble Lord to have a word with those who drafted the Labour manifesto, which says, as a standalone sentence: “Hereditary peers remain indefensible”.

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I associate myself with the comments of both the noble Lord, Lord Brennan, and my noble friend Lord Thurso. There is not, and never has been, the sort of link between the hereditary Peers and the monarch that I suspect the noble Earl, Lord Devon, was suggesting. We...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc58-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that I seem to remember that in the House of Lords which, to its shame, agreed to the execution of the King, there were only about six Peers who still sat, because of the exigencies of the Civil War and...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc59-62
House
House of Lords

I am very sorry to disappoint the noble Lord, Lord True, because I am standing to speak to Amendment 3 rather than my noble friend the Leader of the House. I thank the noble Earl for his amendment and also for his transparency in explaining that this is indeed a...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc62-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. The noble Lord, Lord Grocott, made the point that the monarchy had certainly survived the departure of 600-plus hereditary Peers in 1998-99, but does the Minister accept that we are now breaking the link between hereditary Peers in Parliament in its...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

Yes, I do—that is the intention of the Bill. My point is that it does not impact at all the principle of our constitutional monarchy. It has no bearing on it whatever, and it is for those reasons that I respectfully ask the noble Earl to consider withdrawing his amendment.

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

Before the noble and learned Lord sits down, my recollection of 1999 was that the royal Princes specifically indicated that they would not wish to sit in this House. My further recollection is that, in the cloakroom, there were very grand coat hooks for the Prince of Wales and other...

Member
Lord Hardie (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and learned Lord for the little bit of history—I am very grateful.

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister very much for his words and particularly for being so brief, because I did not mean for this amendment to try your Lordships’ patience. I am very grateful to all who contributed to the debate. It is an amendment that deserved to stand alone, and I...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc63-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Strathclyde

4: Clause 1, page 1, line 1, at end insert—

“(A1) In section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 (exclusion of hereditary peers), at end insert “, except for the Earl Marshal and the Lord Great Chamberlain”.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would retain the Earl Marshal and the...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c64
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 4 is a short amendment with a very small impact on two Members of this House. It is less a probing amendment and more one that I very much hope the Front Bench will be able to accept. The Leader of the House, at Second Reading and...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc64-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too have put my name to this amendment. These two Great Officers of State have been in existence since 1386, in the case of the Earl Marshal, and 1130, in the case of Lord Great Chamberlain. It was intended that they were required not only to perform...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc65-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too put my name to the amendment. My point is wholly pragmatic. It seems that the Earl Marshal and the Lord Great Chamberlain would be better placed to perform their functions, which they have to perform, if they were entitled to come here on a regular basis...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c66
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, retaining the connection between these two Great Officers of State and this place would reassure those who are concerned about the weakening link between this place and the monarch. Secondly, what does the Lord Privy Seal say about the role of the Lord Great Chamberlain? As she...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c66
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these two Great Officers of State are part of the framework that governs the Government and how they function. It would be humiliating for them to have to apply to something such as the commission to be able to come in here and fulfil their roles, which are...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c66
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is with reverence for our traditions and institutions that I support the amendment in the names of my noble friend Lord Strathclyde and others, and to defend the continued membership of this House of the Earl Marshal and the Lord Great Chamberlain. This is not merely to...

Member
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc66-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their amendments and for the comments that have been made. I think I can offer some of the reassurance that is sought. Certainly, in

response to the noble Baroness, Lady Finn, I can say that we respect and regard the work...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc67-9
House
House of Lords

I think they should have it by right, not by permission.

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c69
House
House of Lords

If agreed by the House, it will be a right. There has been some misunderstanding that the only way they can fulfil their functions is by being a Member of this House and having the right to speak and vote in the Chamber. That is not the case. If we...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c69
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lady Finn, who spoke with great authority and skill. The more she spoke, the more convinced I was that I was right to move the amendment in the first place. Her knowledge of history and precedent in this matter is exemplary.

I am also...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c69
House
House of Lords

They will have access to the House, however that is arranged. They are not going to have to troll up to the pass office and get a daily pass that they stick on them. They will have the access that is required for this House. All Members of the House...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am reminded of the debates that took place many years ago on the future of the Lord Chancellor, when he was removed from your Lordships’ House. It was the law of unintended consequences. There was much work undertaken to try to keep all of that and I...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c70
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Soames of Fletching

5: Clause 1, page 1, line 1, at end insert—

“(A1) In section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 (exclusion of hereditary peers), at end insert “except for peers who are members of the House of Lords on the day on which the House of...

Member
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving the amendment in my name, may I say first, without sounding too much like Lord Copper, what a great privilege it is to take part in this debate, and to have listened in particular to two magnificent speeches from my noble friends Lord True and Lord...

Member
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc70-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Soames and agree with everything he said, particularly his praise for the two excellent speeches we had at the beginning.

We are removing the 88 hereditaries, but in the first 234 days of the Government’s existence the Prime Minister has created 45 life...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc71-2
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c72
House
House of Lords

But it is worth knowing the names of all those hereditaries who have been working their socks off in this place for years and will be thrown out. There is the Earl of Leicester, the Earl of Lindsay, Lord Londesborough, Lord Lucas, the Earl of Lytton, Lord Mancroft, Lord Meston,...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c73
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I knew that I was unimportant when my noble friend Lord Blencathra omitted me from his list, but now it has been confirmed. I am very grateful to him for doing that. As we approach the dinner hour, it is obviously time for very long speeches, and I...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c73
House
House of Lords

I observe briefly to the noble Lord, Lord Blencathra, that he is partial in his recollection of the career of the great Raymond Baxter. The other programme that he was famous for was called, “Tomorrow’s World”. I was an avid watcher of that programme as a young boy, and I...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c73
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Walter Bagehot once observed that the British constitution derives its strength not from rigid design but from its adaptability. Its value lies in its ability to preserve what is valuable while reforming what is necessary. It is in that spirit, and not in defiance of reform but in...

Member
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc73-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the risk of repeating what I said at Second Reading, I have always been totally confused as to why, for some reason, we who are appointed Peers are somehow superior to hereditary Peers—who, let us face it, as the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, has never failed to...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc74-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment. The exceptions to whom his amendment would apply are people who contain and are characterised by many qualities, but I mention only four here: experience, knowledge, constancy and loyalty to this Chamber, and a non-political aspect. This may seem strange coming from...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c75
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think this amendment shows the problem that we were discussing earlier with the groupings, because we have actually been discussing, along with this amendment, Amendment 9 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord True, and they both deal with the question of the future of those...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc75-6
House
House of Lords

Can I correct the noble Lord on one factual error that he has made—quite inadvertently, I am sure. According to the Library list, leaving aside the one mistake in the case of my noble friend Lord Astor, there are fewer than 20 hereditaries who do not participate in the work...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c76
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord looks down the list, he will see that there may be some people who come twice a year and vote three times a year, but I did not include those in the list of people whom I consider to be active. I am happy to go...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c76
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the difficulty with the noble Lord’s suggestion, in my case, is that I would be relying upon knowing the leader of my party. I do not properly know any of the party leaders, and they do not know me either, so I would have as much chance as...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c76
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to disappoint the noble Lord, Lord Newby, but I am responding on Amendment 5, moved by my noble friend Lord Soames of Fletching from these Benches. In speaking to this amendment, I take the opportunity to recognise the significant and invaluable contribution that hereditary Peers...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc76-8
House
House of Lords

They were actually elected; they were not chosen.

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c78
House
House of Lords

Sorry, I was using “chosen” as a short form for “elected”. They were elected. My noble friend was here, and I was not, but when the elections took place, the electorate was keen to ensure that experience was not lost. That is exactly the point of this amendment—to retain those...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c78
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for this debate and to the noble Lord, Lord Soames of Fletching, for raising these issues. One thing that concerns me is that, although I do not think that anyone in this Chamber would deny the valuable work of individuals, particularly of the hereditary Peers,...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc78-9
House
House of Lords

The manifesto commitment, as the noble Lord has just quoted, is to “remove the right” of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in this House. That right was removed in 1999. We are discussing removing not the right but hereditary Peers from this House. The noble Lord quite rightly said...

Member
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c79
House
House of Lords

Of course, the principle was established in 1999, and we are now dealing with that remaining temporary arrangement that has gone on for 25 years or longer. That is the reality. No one can deny that that remaining element—that temporary arrangement—is specifically addressed in the Labour manifesto for the last...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c79
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to intervene on the noble Lord, but he is making much store about the manifesto, which also says that Peers who are over the age of 80 by the end of this Parliament should also be slung out. Does the noble Lord think that is really going...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c79
House
House of Lords

As my noble friend the Leader of the House has reminded me, she will be consulting on that and looking at ways for it to be implemented—she is already doing so, as she reminds me. The fact of the matter is that we have a clear commitment. The Government have...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc79-80
House
House of Lords