Skip to main content

101-200 of 23,107 results for subject:Veterans

Type

-
Early day motions (308)
+ Legislation (53) + Acts (4)
-
Public acts (4)
+ Bills (22) + Public bills (22)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (18)
-
Ballot bills (4)
-
Presentation bills (5)
-
Ten minute rule bills (9)
+ Delegated legislation (27) + Statutory instruments (27)
-
Remedial orders (1)
+ Members' contributions (16,115)
-
Business questions (209)
-
Maiden speeches (18)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,561)
-
Oral question time interventions (18)
+ Oral questions (1,739)
-
Prime Minister's questions (134)
-
Topical questions (287)
-
Points of order (20)
-
Proceeding contributions (12,791)
+ Parliamentary committees (216) + Committee proceedings (110)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (7)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (10)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (26)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (49)
-
Select Committee reports (28)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (18)
-
Select Committee written evidence (78)
+ Parliamentary papers (465)
-
Annual reports (23)
-
Command papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (289)
-
House of Commons papers (150)
-
House of Lords papers (9)
-
Impact assessments (2)
-
Unprinted papers (11)
-
White papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (751) + Debates (380)
-
Adjournment debates (69)
-
Backbench debates (15)
+ Committee proceedings (110)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (7)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (10)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (26)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (49)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (4)
+ Legislative debates (150)
-
Debates on bills (117)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (33)
+ Monarch's speech debates (7)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (6)
-
Opposition days (9)
-
Questions for short debate (28)
+ Petitions and observations (12)
-
Observations on petitions (6)
-
Paper petitions (6)
+ Statements (332) + Oral statements (58)
-
Business statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (50)
-
Select Committee statements (4)
-
Speaker's statements (3)
-
Written statements (274)
-
Urgent questions (6)
+ Written corrections (18)
-
Ministerial corrections (17)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,324)
-
Business questions (209)
+ Oral questions (1,739)
-
Prime Minister's questions (134)
-
Topical questions (287)
-
Urgent questions (6)
-
Written questions (5,370)
+ Petitions and observations (12)
-
Observations on petitions (6)
-
Paper petitions (6)
+ Research briefings (64) + Commons Briefing papers (32)
-
Briefing papers on bills (11)
-
Data dashboards (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (19)
+ Lords Library Briefings (11)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)
-
POSTnotes (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I added my name to these amendments, and I agree with the points that have been so well made by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. I will start my brief remarks by making just a couple of general points. First, while there have been some criticisms of...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc647-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I should like to say a few words in support of my noble friend Lord De Mauley, and in particular to reinforce everything he said about Amendments 50 and 51. On Amendment 51, I will say no more than that it plays into the issues I was...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc648-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 50 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and other noble Lords, which seeks to ensure that lords-lieutenants’ involvement as presidents of regional RFCA councils remains enshrined in primary legislation. I support the comments just made by the noble Earl, Lord Howe.

I...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc649-650
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord De Mauley. I say from the outset that I do not oppose reform in principle and I did not put my name to the notices to oppose Clause 38 or Schedule 6 standing part, which...

Member
Lord Harlech (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc650-1
House
House of Lords

I am pleased to add my name to this suite of amendments that cover a broad area. On Amendment 48, I am sure that any of us who have served as Ministers or council leaders will have appointed loads of people to different bodies over the years. One thing I...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc651-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to the amendments to which I have attached my name. As the noble Lord, Lord Empey, pointed out, this is a reasonable set of amendments. Again, they speak to issues around the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations; in many ways, they could have been part...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc652-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, much has been said by noble Lords, noble and gallant Lords, me and my noble friend Lord De Mauley about the importance of the continuation of the voluntary nature of the RFCAs. This is not because I wish to sound like a stuck record; it is out of...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc653-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, for the amendments whose presentation to us he led on.

I say to the noble Lord, Lord Empey, as I have said on a number of occasions both to the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and to the Committee as a whole, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

I suggest, in answer to that point from the Minister, that what it does is call into question their independence from their MoD masters.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That might be a matter for us to consider in the conversation that we have. I do not want to go on for too long, but I understand many of the comments that different people have made this evening; I agree with some of them to a larger or lesser...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

The Minister has said that he does not believe that having paid non-executive directors will lessen their commitment. That is not the question, though. Surely the question is: does having unpaid representatives lessen their commitment? It does not. So why do we want to change it?

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That is the difference. I understand the whole point about the voluntary ethos generally across the reserves and cadet associations; I absolutely accept that. I am saying, with respect to the board members, that, where you are creating a national board

that wants to take on certain statutory functions, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc654-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank those noble Lords who have spoken in support of the amendments. I also thank the Minister. He said that voluntary bodies all over the country have paid people at their heads. Of course they do. I am a trustee or president of, I think, seven charities....

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c656
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

53: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“Visiting forces agreements

(1) The Secretary of State must publish in unredacted form any part of a treaty, memorandum of understanding or agreement between the United Kingdom and any sending country relating to visiting forces containing a decision about a jurisdictional...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c656
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Thomas of Gresford cannot be in his place today as he is recovering at home after an operation. We hope that he will be back with us by Report. I have signed his amendment and I will speak to it. I have tabled Amendments...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc656-660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and to thank her for supporting my Amendment 55. I am going to concentrate on that amendment, because this is a carefully worked attempt to deal with an issue that the noble Baroness has already clearly...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc661-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think I need to wind up from these Benches. My noble friend Lady Brinton has said everything that needs to be said.

9.45 pm

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c663
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and to the noble Baronesses, Lady Brinton and Lady Bennett of Manor Castle, for tabling these amendments. This group gives us an opportunity to discuss a complex but very important area of the law. I am also...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc663-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baronesses, Lady Brinton and Bennett, and the noble Earl, Lord Minto, for their important contributions on an incredibly important area of law, in relation to which a number of matters have been raised, recently and not so recently, that cause us all concern. For...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc664-6
House
House of Lords

I wonder if I could ask a brief question, because it is relevant to my response to the Minister’s contribution. Is there currently an agreement between the UK and the USA, as is described in the Visiting Forces Act and referred to elsewhere? Other countries have it. Is there already...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c666
House
House of Lords

I am concerned about misinforming your Lordships on legal matters. When I take legal advice, I will write as to the correct answer to that. I will copy in other Members of your Lordships’ House and place a copy in the Library.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c666
House
House of Lords

I understand if the Minister will want to write in answer to this question as well. He referred to the National Police Chiefs’ Council considering further formal guidance and writing to forces. What will that be based on? What is the legal basis of this? Where is it coming from?...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c667
House
House of Lords

I am not sure if I totally understand what the noble Baroness means. I thought it was a pretty important step that the National Police Chiefs’ Council was taking in looking at whether the current guidance was appropriate or further guidance was needed to ensure that some of the issues...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c667
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who spoke in this debate. Earlier, I should also have thanked the Centre for Military Justice, the Guardian and the women I spoke to. I was glad to hear the speech by the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett. Unsurprisingly, we agree almost entirely on the problems....

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc667-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay

55A: Clause 48, page 68, line 15, at end insert—

“(8) After section 230(1) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 (salvage claims against the Crown and Crown rights of salvage and regulation thereof) insert—

“(1A) Subsection (1) does not apply to any vessel, including Royal Fleet Auxiliary...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c668
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 55A stands in my name. It is rather a late amendment, and this is the first time I have spoken on the Bill. I apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, for inadvertently gazumping his amendment on Clause 48 standing part of the Bill. I look forward...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc668-670
House
House of Lords

I oppose Clause 48 standing part of the Bill. There are two issues here. One relates to the wrecks that contain military remains; the other relates to diving activities related to those wrecks, which the Bill will describe as protected places. My contention

is that insufficient detail has been provided...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc670-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had two fascinating speeches from noble Lords who have considerable expertise and interest in the questions of military remains. I will be interested in the Minister’s responses, particularly to the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, that further work be done on this clause. Again,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c672
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am probably about to provide a less fascinating speech. I endorse everything said by my noble friend Lord Parkinson and, as such, I am pleased to support his amendment. Clause 48 will automatically expand the protection provided by the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 to every...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc672-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who has contributed to the debate. I will start with Amendment 55A from the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson. I thank him for bringing that forward in relation to salvage claims against military and Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels via the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, which is...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc673-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his reply. As he rightly says, the technology and its increased availability to many more people is the reason why the broader changes that the Government are seeking to make through the Bill are so timely and needed.

On my Amendment 55A,...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c675
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

56: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Waived fees for indefinite leave to remain for spouses or children of serving or discharged members of the armed forces

(1) The Immigration and Nationality (Fees) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/330) are amended as follows.

(2) In paragraph 2 of Schedule...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc675-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 56, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Harlech, for adding his name in support of it. I also thank the Royal British Legion for its guidance in drafting this amendment.

Amendment 56 proposes amending the nationality fees regulations of 2018 to waive fees for certain Armed...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc676-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 56 from the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, which would waive fees for indefinite leave to remain applications for spouses and immediate family members of serving personnel and veterans. I have tabled Amendment 66, which seeks to achieve the same outcome through...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc677-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Penn, and to attach my name to Amendment 57, which would provide for six weeks of fully paid paternity leave for servicepeople. The Committee will see that this is perhaps not the broadest alliance across the political spectrum...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc679-680
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak very briefly in support of the amendment in the name of the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, and that in the name of my noble friend Lady Penn. The shared aim of these amendments is to improve morale among our Armed Forces...

Member
Lord Harlech (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c680
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, has held His Majesty’s Governments, of whichever complexion, to account over the years, particularly, as he mentioned

earlier, over the rights of the Hong Kong military. He rightly reminds us that all the main parties gave commitments to waive...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc680-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn first to Amendment 56, tabled by the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, and supported by my noble friend Lord Harlech. I am pleased to be able to say that we on these Benches support this amendment. We have already waived the fees for...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the hour, let me deal with this head on. I shall start with Amendment 56, tabled by the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig. The Government, the Opposition and all of us, it seems to me, are committed to scrapping visa fees for non-UK

veterans who have...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc681-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, the Minister answering my question in such a positive way is very encouraging. It certainly made my day—or perhaps I should say it has made my night. I also thank the noble Baronesses and the two noble Lords who spoke in favour of my amendment, which...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c683
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Goldie

58: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Overseas operations and the European Convention on Human Rights

(1) The Human Rights Act 1998 is amended as follows.

(2) For section 7A (limitation: overseas forces proceedings) substitute—

“7A No proceedings for overseas operations

(1) No proceedings may be brought under section 7(1)(a) in...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c683
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there may be some among your Lordships who looked at this amendment in my name and had a flash of déjà vu. That is because, of course, we have in some manner been here before, except that I was the one facing a grilling from noble Lords, rather...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc683-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we generally agree that our country needs our Armed Forces, including the reserves and the cadets, more than ever. We need to encourage people to join, and we need to look after them when they do. We ask them to risk their lives on our behalf....

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc686-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to both the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, and the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, for their introduction to the amendment and for explaining it in detail. I am not a lawyer, so forgive me for not being able to respond to some of the cases...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc687-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, for introducing her amendments, and acknowledge the points she has made. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, for his contribution to the debate. I say to him that clearly—not only in the context of this Bill but also within a...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c688
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for allowing me to intervene. He is right up to a point, in the sense that it is true that, provided we remain a member of the European convention, there is potentially a remedy if there is considered to be a breach of the convention...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c688
House
House of Lords

I understand the point, very well made, by the noble Lord, Lord Faulks—but that is the debate we are having. The argument the Government put forward is that the disapplication of the Human Rights Act does not prevent the application of the ECHR. That is the point that is being...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

May I simply say this one thing? Until we had the Human Rights Act, we were a member of the European convention. We did not initially even have the right to go to Strasbourg. We then allowed those who wanted to bring an action to go to the Strasbourg court,...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

The Government would make both points; I am just speaking to the amendment. If I was not responding to the amendment but putting the whole point around the Human Rights Act and the ECHR, I would say that the Government are proud to have the Human Rights Act, which a...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

I promise the Minister that this is the last intervention that I will make. It is to deal with the point made by the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. Her understanding was that the Government cannot derogate. I understand the Minister’s answer to the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, that we want...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c689
House
House of Lords

In all the time that I have been in this House, that is the first time that I have not understood what the noble Lord means. I have said what I have said and I will leave it there.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c690
House
House of Lords

I will give it one more go; it is probably my lack of clarity. Do the Government have the right to derogate at all? That was the issue that was being raised; maybe I have misunderstood it. The Minister’s understandable answer is that the Government have the right to derogate...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c690
House
House of Lords

The Government can make the laws and derogate should they wish to do so. I have pointed out the inconsistency of the amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Gouldie, which would require us to derogate from the Human Rights Act but would not achieve her objective because it still...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c690
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that the Minister understands fully what it is like to be grilled at the Dispatch Box in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act.

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, and the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for their contributions. I...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c690
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Lord Bishop of Norwich

59: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Impersonation of service police

(1) Section 90 of the Police Act 1996 (impersonation, etc.) is amended as follows.

(2) In subsection (1), after “force” insert “including service police”.

(3) In subsection (2), after “force” insert “including service police”.

(4) In subsection...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c691
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 59, I will also speak to Amendment 60 in my name; I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Newnham, and the noble Earl, Lord Minto, for their support. I declare an interest as the father of a soldier.

The amendments that I am proposing aim...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc691-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendments in the name of the right reverend Prelate, to which I have appended my name. As the right reverend Prelate rightly pointed out, there are disparities in the provisions for service police versus civilian police, which seems wholly wrong. For the reason of expediting...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c692
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, have signed both of the amendments tabled by the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Norwich because I believe that they have identified two important gaps in the law.

Section 90 of the Police Act 1996 creates the offence of impersonating

“a member of a police force or...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc692-3
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Earl, Lord Minto, and I particularly thank the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Norwich. I have had a number of conversations with him about this outside the Chamber. I have asked my officials to look at his Amendment 59, with respect to the impersonation of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c693
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, for her brevity at this late hour when many of us want to be tucked up in bed. It was worth staying up to hear the analysis of the noble Earl, Lord Minto. That was particularly helpful regarding...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c693
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Smith of Newnham

61: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Independent review of Armed Forces recruitment and retention

(1) The Secretary of State must commission an independent review of the processes for recruitment and retention across His Majesty’s forces.

(2) The review under subsection (1) must, in particular, consider—

(a) the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c694
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to the first three amendments in my name, which are in group 12: Amendments 61, 62 and 63. I am not going to do them justice at this time of night, because the first amendment is calling for an independent review of Armed Forces recruitment...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc694-5
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment 61 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, requiring an independent review of Armed Forces recruitment and retention. At this late hour, I will just say that, at a time when there are nearly a million young people not in education, employment or training, we...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c695
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall briefly speak to Amendment 62. My noble friend raised the point about it being important for veterans to be able to have their details in their hands. The NHS guidance for veterans specifically notes that it takes several months for the full records to follow the...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c695
House
House of Lords

Briefly, my Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, has raised some important issues in these amendments. Between 1999 and 2025

there were only seven years in which more people joined the regular forces than left them, and the strategic defence review was blunt enough to call the result a workforce...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc695-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me just say this: none of us is going to do justice to the amendments that the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, has brought forward. She made a couple of important points, as did the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. I also...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c696
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed, particularly the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, who cosigned Amendment 61, and my noble friend Lady Brinton. We look forward to the letter from the Minister and with that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c696
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Smith of Newnham

64: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Reporting on the Defence Investment Plan

(1) Every six months after the day on which this Act is passed for the duration of this Parliament, and every year thereafter, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc696-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this very small group, unfortunately numbered group 13, is about the defence investment plan. In particular, it felt appropriate to bring forward amendments that had been laid in the other place by my honourable friends; I think it was James MacCleary who tabled them. Essentially, they suggest that...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c697
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Newnham, is once again highlighting an issue that we have spent a significant amount of time debating in your Lordships’ House. The glaring hole in the funding of the DIP has to be addressed. The funding issues have not yet been resolved....

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c697
House
House of Lords

I will finish with an upbeat message: I have never felt that I have lacked scrutiny on the defence investment plan or on accountability with respect to defence spending. I have answered numerous questions from the noble Baronesses, Lady Smith and Lady Goldie, and the noble Earl, Lord Minto. I...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c698
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Earl, Lord Minto, for his support in challenging His Majesty’s Government and to the Minister for his ever-ready presence to respond at the Dispatch Box. We may well come back to the impact of DIP delays, particularly in terms of supply chains,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c698
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department has issued guidance on the relevance of the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021 to investigations relating to Operation Banner.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
22710
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what expenditure his Department has incurred on legal representation for veterans involved in Troubles-related legacy proceedings since 5 July 2024.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
22708
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of trends in the number of armed forces veterans awaiting an outcome to Cash Equivalent Transfer Value enquiries for pension benefits.

Asked by
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
21895
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 66 of his Department's Strategic Defence Review, published on 2 June 2025, what progress his Department has made in the Office of Veterans’ Affairs connecting positively with society and recruiting the next generation through setting veterans up for...

Asked by
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
21554
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 26 January 2026 to Question 107232 on Veterans: Visas, whether it remains his policy to waive applicable fees for Indefinite Leave to Remain for the spouses and children or current and former personnel who have served for...

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
23015
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many armed forces veterans are currently awaiting an outcome to their Cash Equivalent Transfer Value enquiry for their pension benefits.

Asked by
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
21894
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent estimate he has made of the number of people supported through the LGBT+ Financial Recognition Scheme; and what further steps he plans to take to ensure all eligible LGBT+ veterans are able to access this scheme.

Asked by
Chris Ward (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
26800
House
House of Commons
Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Presentation bills
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
Bill 140 2026-27
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

I am grateful to the sponsors of this snappily-titled Bill, who are the deputy Leader of the Opposition, my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Alex Burghart); the shadow Defence Secretary, my hon. Friend the Member...

Member
Lincoln Jopp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 cc629-631
House
House of Commons

In essence, what my hon. Friend is doing, very ably, is to try to defend those who defended us. May I place on the record that, in that noble aim, from the Conservative Benches he has our wholehearted and undivided support?

Member
Mark Francois (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 c631
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that intervention. I know that there is support on the Government Benches as well—I just could not find it when I went out to get sponsors. There are many veterans on the Government Benches, and on the Liberal Democrat Benches, and there...

Member
Lincoln Jopp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 cc631-2
House
House of Commons

May I first thank the hon. Member for his service in Northern Ireland, and extend those thanks to the thousands of servicemen who came to my part of the United Kingdom to defend democracy and to defend us all from terrorist forces? He mentions moral issues. Is not the greatest...

Member
Jim Allister (Traditional Unionist Voice)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 c632
House
House of Commons

There is no moral equivalence in my book between men and women who served their nation in good faith and did a difficult job in a deadly environment, and what the terrorists did. It is worth pointing out, if any hon. Members are feeling queasy about my Bill, that one...

Member
Lincoln Jopp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 c632
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. and gallant Member for Spelthorne (Lincoln Jopp) for the wonderful way in which he has introduced the Bill today and given us the opportunity to have this conversation. Like many hon. Members, I approach this debate with some significant degree of hesitation because of the weight...

Member
Adam Thompson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 c632
House
House of Commons

Second reading. Debate adjourned. To be resumed on 11 September.

Lead member
Lincoln Jopp
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 September 2026
Reference
790 cc629-633
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his department plans to keep Ilford Park Polish Home open to new admissions after 2027; and what steps he is taking to honour the commitment made to Polish veterans under the Polish Resettlement Act 1947.

Asked by
Joe Robertson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
24630
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that clinical assessments for former Armed Forces personnel under (a) Op COURAGE and (b) Op RESTORE include screening for mefloquine (Larium) toxicity.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
19062
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will assess the potential merits of collecting data on (i) long-term health, (ii) employment and (iii) housing outcomes of medically discharged veterans.

Asked by
Rachel Gilmour (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
19659
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what resources within the Valour programme are dedicated to the needs of LGBTQ+ Veterans.

Asked by
Helen Maguire (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
19284
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
HC 162 2026-27
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Notes
Paragraphs 77, 78, 93 to 95, 105, 107 agreed to (5 votes to 2); amendment to paragraph 121 negatived (2 votes to 5) and the paragraph agreed to (5 votes to 2); paragraphs 139, 140, 151 to 181 agreed to (5 votes to 2); amendment to paragraph 182 negatived (2 votes to 5), and the paragraph agreed to (5 votes to 2); amendment to paragraph 233 negatived (2 votes to 5) and the paragraph agreed to (5 votes to 2); two amendments to the Summary negatived (2 votes to 5), with the Summary agreed to. The remaining paragraphs agreed to. Motion that the report be the Third Report of the Committee agreed to (5 votes to 2).
Date
2 September 2026
Reference
HC 162 2026-27; HL 49 2026-27
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

That this house celebrates the life changing work of the Somerset Armed Forces Hub has done for veterans in Somerset; notes that the Somerset Armed Forces Hub is based in ARK (Acts of Random Kindness) at Egwood in Yeovil constituency, and is open to all members of the Armed Forces...

Primary sponsor
Adam Dance (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
725
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent Northern Ireland veterans facing further legal proceedings relating to their service during the Troubles.

Asked by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 August 2026
Reference
HL2404
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to provide compensation to nuclear test veterans.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2026
Reference
HL2488
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, chapter 3, paragraph 14, does the £70 million allocation for Veterans between FY26/27 and FY29/30 include provision for waiving visa fees for spouses and children of service personnel who have...

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 July 2026
Reference
18795
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress he has made on reducing the backlog of veterans' pensions affected by the McCloud remedy, including expected timelines for cases to be resolved.

Asked by
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
18530
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to reduce processing times for veterans' claims under the Armed Forces Pension Scheme.

Asked by
Maria Eagle (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
18529
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many veterans with amputations or other permanent injuries were reassessed for disability-related benefits in each of the last three years.

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
17658
House
House of Commons