Skip to main content

201-300 of 4,041 results for subject:"Data processing"

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (17) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (6)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (3,512)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (4)
+ Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,503)
+ Parliamentary committees (102) + Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Select Committee reports (11)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (8)
-
Select Committee written evidence (19)
+ Parliamentary papers (168)
-
Annual reports (2)
-
Command papers (11)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (107)
-
House of Commons papers (30)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Impact assessments (8)
-
Treaties (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (9)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (127) + Debates (117)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (104)
-
Debates on bills (91)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
+ Statements (10)
-
Written statements (10)
+ Parliamentary questions (205) + Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (200)
+ Research briefings (15) + Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Briefing papers on bills (6)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTnotes (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I declare an interest as chair of the Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society. I offer the unequivocal and steadfast support from the Liberal Democrat Benches for Motion A1 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, which introduces Amendment 49F in lieu of Amendment 49D.

It is absolutely...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 cc498-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as this is the third round of ping-pong, as many noble Lords have observed, I will speak very briefly. If the noble Baroness the Minister has not by now understood how strongly noble Lords on all sides of the House feel about this issue, it may be too...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 cc499-500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must once again thank all noble Lords who have spoken during this debate, and of course I continue to recognise the passion and the depth of feeling on this issue.

I did not think I needed to reiterate this, but we absolutely believe in the importance of the...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 cc500-1
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. Could she just deal with the point that was made by the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, and others? Why, if the Government are working and looking for a compromise, have they sent this back to the House without any proposal from the...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 c501
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I set out my comments, I said that I have made compromises, and I will reiterate them. We are trying to find a way through on the detail of how we are going to find something that is workable and deliverable in the longer term. That is...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 c501
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for giving way, but does she accept that in order for these discussions to be fruitful in the round table and workshops that the Government have proposed, all parties need to know that they are entering those discussions on an equal footing? Although the noble...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 c501
House
House of Lords

The Secretary of State and all the Ministers in the department have made it absolutely clear how vital it is that the creative sector’s interests are protected in the discussions. The sector will be part of the working groups, have a seat

at the table and have its voice heard....

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 cc501-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first thank everyone who has spoken. I am particularly grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Liddle, who thinks that I have won. I therefore hope that he expects and anticipates that one of my amendments will make it into the Bill, because that is what winning looks...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 June 2025
Reference
846 cc503-4
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Education Committee
Date
20 May 2025
Reference
HC 915 2024-26
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 19/5/2025 from Baroness Blake of Leeds to Lord Scriven responding to questions raised during the debate on the Health and Social Care Information (Procedure) Regulations 2025. 4p.

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
DEP2025-0319
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reasons. Lords disagreement to Commons amendment 32, and Lords amendments 32B and 32C to the words so restored to the bill not insisted on. Lords amendment 43B not insisted on. Lords amendment 49B not insisted on and amendment 49D in lieu agreed to on division (289...

Lead member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch
Answering member
Viscount Camrose
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc19-40
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c19
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to Motions B and D. This first group is concerned with amendments relating to sex and gender in digital verification services, the data dictionary and scientific research. In relation to digital verification services and the data dictionary, I am grateful to the noble Viscount,...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc19-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I was Opposition Chief Whip in another place, I was never really sure whether it was my job to make sure that legislation was as good as possible for the good of the country or as bad as possible in order to make sure that the Government...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her introduction. In view of the remarks made a week ago by the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Vallance, who referred to government datasets from the past 15 years which mixed up sex and gender as “accurate”—or perhaps “sort of accurate”, because the...

Member
Baroness Ludford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this important debate. I will first speak to the issues around accurate recording of sex data before coming on to talk about scientific research.

Throughout the passage of the Bill, we have been clear that digital verification services will be...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc21-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite the fact this is not being pushed to a vote—I respect that, and I concede that the Government have made some clarifications, and potentially concessions, along the way in this debate—I think that the issue is not yet resolved. I call on the Government to try to...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc22-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her engagement and for defining what genuine scientific research is. I hope very much that the AI companies, when using this extraordinary exemption, will listen to the Government, and that the Government will ensure that the policy is enforced. The trust of the...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c23
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too thank the Minister for her introduction to the three Motions in this group.

On these Benches, we welcome the Supreme Court’s judgment on the meaning of “sex” in the Equality Act 2010. However, as Ministers have stressed—and we agree—it is paramount that we work through the implications...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc23-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their contributions. I reassure your Lordships’ House that the Government are progressing workstreams focused on the accuracy and reliability of sex data in public authority datasets in a holistic and measured manner, as I have described in previous debates. We welcome the Supreme...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c24
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wonder, with regard to sexuality, whether the Minister has considered those children who are, unfortunately, born with perhaps an ovary and a testis, or with genitalia which are difficult to identify. How do those become categorised under this regulation?

The second thing is that the definition of science...

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c25
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the first thing I would say about categorisation, as I hope I have stressed all along, is that data verification services will be required to provide accurate information. Normally, biological sex is not one of the things that most people need for their identity most of the time,...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c25
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c25
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to Motion C1.

I am conscious of the words of my noble friend the Chief Whip at the start of our proceedings, so I will try not to add unnecessarily to our ongoing discussion on the issue of AI and copyright. As both Minister Bryant...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc26-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kidron

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c27
House
House of Lords

My Lords, last week, we had a decisive vote in favour of transparency for UK copyright holders—a first step towards protecting the labour and property of UK creators and creative businesses. Sadly, despite powerful interventions in the other place from all sides, including the Government Benches, those provisions were overturned...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc28-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, here is a very useful amendment proposed by the noble Baroness at this stage of the proceedings.

For the creative industries, it offers certainty that a transparency regime will be in place within 18 months of Royal Assent. Within a timetable of their own choosing, it also leaves the...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak reluctantly on the issue because, as I have said before, I am a rights holder. I refer to my register of interests. Following the speech by the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, very little needs to be said. It was absolutely brilliant and searing.

I say to the...

Member
Lord Cashman (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc30-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Motion C1 from the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron. I applaud her tenacity and dogged determination to make a difference to the future of our creative industries. She has fought tirelessly to get the Government to consider and accept her amendments.

This amendment, if accepted, will tell the...

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have two brief points in answer to things that both the noble Baroness, Lady Twycross, and Chris Bryant have said in the last week, and that the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Whitchurch, has said today. First, when the Government say that the Bill is not the...

Member
Earl of Clancarty (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c32
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is in some sadness that I rise again to talk on this matter. I thank Government Ministers for the very positive way in which they have engaged with my noble friends and me to discuss how to make some progress and find some kind of compromise on...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc32-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it seems that the Government are relying on two arguments to reject the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron. The first is that regulating AI is such a big, complex problem that we cannot deal with one bit; we have to deal with it all. The second...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc33-4
House
House of Lords

In supporting my noble friend Lady Kidron, I would like to make one or two things clear. The creative industries are not against AI. Filmmakers, television producers, composers and writers have helped to create the very technology that goes into AI. The creative industries are not trying to pull up...

Member
Lord Berkeley of Knighton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c34
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, for her indefatigable efforts. She has argued persuasively, patiently and passionately—and there is nothing wrong with a bit of passion in this Chamber, is there chuck?

It is not just the noble Baroness. We heard about Elton John over the weekend. He...

Member
Lord Dobbs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc34-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it’s a little bit funny, this feeling inside, as I rise to support the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron—which my Front Bench so clearly opposes—but I’m still standing, because I do not yet believe that Ministers have heard the clarion cry from our country’s creators that...

Member
Lord Watson of Wyre Forest (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc35-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very well aware, as so many others in this House are, that we are on the second round of ping-pong. Up to now, I have never voted against the Government on a second round of ping-pong, but this is rather special. This is actually crucial. There...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c36
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be brief. We are in a pickle. This is an important Bill that needs to gain Royal Assent quickly, for EU data adequacy reasons if nothing else. Incidentally, I do not believe that the Bill does active harm to the creative sector as it is written,...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc36-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the heart of this debate lies a single critical principle—trust: trust that those who built powerful AI systems will not exploit the work of others without permission; trust that the UK Government will stand by our creative sector; and trust that our laws, long respected internationally, are...

Member
Lord Freyberg (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c37
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, I want to pick up on my noble friend Lady Harding’s point about the Government’s message that they wish to legislate in the round. I urge the Government to listen to the point that my noble friend was making. We started debating the regulation of tech...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c37
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as chair of the Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society.

I express the extremely strong support of all on these Benches for Motion C1, proposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron. I agree with every speech that we have heard so far in today’s debate—I did...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc37-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is probably redundant to pay tribute to the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, for her tenacity and determination to get to a workable solution on this, because it speaks for itself. It has been equally compelling to hear such strong arguments from all sides of the House and...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc38-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again, I acknowledge the passion and depth of feeling from those noble Lords who have spoken and, again, I emphasise that we are all on the same side here. We all want to see a way forward that protects our creative industries, while supporting everyone in the...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 cc39-41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everybody who has spoken on this issue in the House and outside of the House. I particularly thank the Members on the Government Benches; I know it comes hard to disagree with your party, and I really appreciate it, as do all those outside the House.

I...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c40
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2025
Reference
848 c40
House
House of Lords

Consideration of Lords message. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords Amendment 49B, the Lords disagreement with the Commons in Commons Amendment 52 and Lords Amendments 52B and 52C, engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords Amendments 34B and 34C agreed to. Lords Amendments 32B and Lords Amendments 32C disagreed to on division...

Lead member
Chris Bryant
Answering member
Ben Spencer
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 cc410-441
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House insists on Commons Amendment 32 to which the Lords have disagreed and disagrees with the Lords in their Amendments 32B and 32C proposed to the words restored to the Bill by the Lords disagreement.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c410
House
House of Commons

Notwithstanding the views of the Chinese Government, it is a delight to see you in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker. I am only saddened that I have not been sanctioned, which feels a shame—nor by Russia, for that matter. There is still time.

I am delighted to be here today to...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 cc410-1
House
House of Commons

I think we all appreciate the amendment, because we want to protect vulnerable women, children and anybody who is at risk of this sort of harm. Could we not look at doing something similar to the amendment, and the carve-out we have created with it, for our creative industries? If...

Member
Natasha Irons (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c411
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is jumping the gun slightly—I will come on to those issues.

I want to praise Baroness Owen with regard to this part of the legislation. If it had not been for her, I do not think it would have ended up in the Bill. There was a bit...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c411
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c411
House
House of Commons

On the subject of never getting the Bill through, I will, of course, give way to the right hon. Gentleman.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c411
House
House of Commons

One reason for getting the Bill through, one would hope, is to deliver on things like content credentials, which firms like Adobe have championed, to show who has produced a file, where the ownership sits and whether artificial intelligence has been used to edit it. Can the Minister confirm whether...

Member
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c412
House
House of Commons

Well, it is because the Bill was never intended to deal with copyright and artificial intelligence at all. The Government have not introduced any provision relating to AI or copyright, and I think that specific issue would probably be ruled out of scope if it were to be tabled.

There are...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c412
House
House of Commons

My point is about AI being used to change photographs, and having the ability to see that through content credentials or the digital fingerprint. The point I am raising is that the Government themselves have still not adopted that, in terms of their official communications. Will the Bill deliver on...

Member
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c412
House
House of Commons

I am honestly failing to understand the point the right hon. Gentleman is making. The Bill is not and has never been intended to deal with the kind of issue he is referring to. As I say, I think that if somebody were to table amendments to that effect, they...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 cc412-3
House
House of Commons

It is wonderful to hear my hon. Friend talk about the importance of copyright and the fact that we have existing laws that we can use, but I wonder whether he is aware of the growing concern in industry about the risk of expansive US-style fair use principles creeping into...

Member
Samantha Niblett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

As I am sure my hon. Friend is aware, the US system of fair use is different from the UK’s—ours goes back to 1709, with the first of our copyright Acts, and it has been very solid. When we introduced this Bill, I said that this country should be proud...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

I probably ought to give way first to the Chair of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, and then to the hon. Gentleman.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

Yesterday the Minister appeared before our Select Committee and said, “The best kind of AI is the kind of AI that is built on premium content, and you can’t get premium content without paying for premium content.” Now, as well as being concerned about the overuse of the expression “premium...

Member
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

The first thing to say to the right hon. Lady is that I completely stand by everything I said to the Select Committee yesterday. I do believe that the best form of AI will be intelligent artificial intelligence. And just like any pipe, what comes out of it depends on...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Jonathan Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c413
House
House of Commons

Let me finish my point and then I will give way first to the hon. Member for Perth and Kinross-shire (Pete Wishart), who gets very cross if people queue-barge.

I am aware that there are quite a lot of publishing houses in the UK that are determined to secure licensing deals...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c414
House
House of Commons

The Minister keeps saying that we have existing copyright laws that are there to protect the creative industries and our artists, but practically our whole creative heritage is being scraped. There are probably songs in the top 40 that have been totally designed by AI, and there will be books...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c414
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right that there are works out there that have been created with the use of AI. As I have said several times, I have never thought that the creative industries are in any sense luddite; I have always thought that they are at the forefront...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c414
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being very generous with his time. Central to what he is saying is transparency. Does he agree that enforceable transparency obligations would reduce legal uncertainty, deter infringement by increasing the legal risk to AI developers, and enable faster redress by allowing the courts to establish precedent where...

Member
Jonathan Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c414
House
House of Commons

Yes. I do not think that people should breach copyright law. I have said that in several debates, and it is the settled view of the Government. We believe that people should not breach copyright law—they should not break the law. Some of the issues my hon. Friend raises have...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

The Minister mentioned the consultation. Could he confirm that the Government no longer consider an opt-out model to be their preferred approach to copyright and AI, and if so, what alternative approach is now being actively pursued or developed with the sector?

Member
Alison Hume (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

I will say two things. First, we have always said that we were consulting on a package, and part of that package was a technical solution so that rights holders would be able to protect their rights better, in a way that—

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Samantha Niblett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

I will in a moment, but I am still answering the intervention. I had two points to make, and I will now probably forget the second one.

As I was saying, it was always going to be a package of measures, and we always said that we would not introduce that...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Torcuil Crichton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Samantha Niblett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c415
House
House of Commons

I think it was my hon. Friend the Member for Knowsley (Anneliese Midgley) and then I will probably go over to my hon. Friend the Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Torcuil Crichton).

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

The other week, an Observer article reported that a source close to the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology said that

“proposals to introduce an opt-out system of copyright rules was no longer his preferred option but one of several being given consideration.”

That is a very welcome change of...

Member
Anneliese Midgley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I will repeat what I just said. First, in the consultation we introduced a package of measures and it hinged on the issue of whether we can deliver not only for AI companies but for the creative industries, to protect their rights more effectively than they...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

I am afraid the hon. Gentleman is in a queue. It is quite a long queue, and it seems to be getting longer.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for—

Member
Torcuil Crichton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

No, no. I think my hon. Friend the Member for South Derbyshire (Samantha Niblett) is next.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

On the point of finding a solution in the round, if no credible technical solution is in sight, will the Minister confirm what non-technical legislative or regulatory measures the Government are considering to protect rights holders in the interim?

Member
Samantha Niblett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

That is precisely why we need to do this in the round, rather than just piecemeal. I understand the attraction of what is on the amendment paper today, but I do not think it would deliver the answer that the people need now to the issues that the creative industries...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c416
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Polly Billington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c417
House
House of Commons

Hang on! Madam Deputy Speaker, we will have to set up a queuing system.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c417
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that it is popularity, Madam Deputy Speaker.

The important point is that we need to look at this in the round, rather than piecemeal. I do not think that what is on the amendment paper today would deliver anything now. Indeed, it does not purport to; it...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c417
House
House of Commons

We can assure the Minister that he remains popular, as well as generous with his time. He mentioned the Government consultation. It has caused deep and sustained anxiety across the sector. When can we expect a substantive response to the consultation?

Member
Torcuil Crichton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c417
House
House of Commons

I wish I could give my hon. Friend a timeline. The main thing I want to say about the timeline, as somebody who I think all hon. Members know cares passionately not just about the anxiety that has been created in this sphere because of the consultation but about the...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c417
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way; he is being extremely generous with his time.

The Minister is talking about the possibility that the amendments put forward would not do anything today, but there is an urgency in the creative industries because the stuff that they create is being scraped now....

Member
Polly Billington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 cc417-8
House
House of Commons

First, I completely get the urgency of this. In many ways, I wish we had been addressing this two or three years ago, because we are some way behind other countries in relation to this. Secondly, we will prioritise the issue of transparency in all the work we do as...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Polly Billington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

I will give way, but I have the hon. Member for Tunbridge Wells (Mike Martin) waiting.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

Again, my hon. Friend is extremely generous with his time. Will he therefore consider interim measures or guidance that would deliver similar outcomes while legislative options are being explored? That is what the creative industries are looking for.

Member
Polly Billington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

I do not know what interim measures would look like. All three of us on the team, including the Secretary of State, have often said that we are open- minded about anybody coming through the door with a good solution. We are in the business of good ideas, and if...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

Of course I will give way to the hon. Gentleman. I am sorry he has been waiting so long.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way; he is being very generous, although I might suggest that he works on his queuing system a little bit.

I understand that the timetable issue is a difficult one, and most things seem to be arriving in the spring with this Government,...

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c418
House
House of Commons

If I was unable to suggest what interim measures would look like, I am not sure I will be able to please the hon. Gentleman by suggesting what will be in the next King’s Speech. I do not even know when the next King’s Speech will be. As the Minister...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c419
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend told our Select Committee yesterday that it is not for us to give away the labour of other people to third parties for free. Given that the Government have now said they are open-minded, and if open-minded means there is no technical solution, is the Minister open-minded...

Member
Paul Waugh (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 May 2025
Reference
767 c419
House
House of Commons