Skip to main content

41-60 of 30,349 results for subject:Deployment

Type

-
Early day motions (17)
+ Legislation (33) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (19) + Public bills (19)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (16)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (9)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (4)
+ Delegated legislation (11)
-
Statutory instruments (11)
+ Members' contributions (20,616)
-
Business questions (123)
-
Maiden speeches (12)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,894)
-
Oral question time interventions (32)
+ Oral questions (1,952)
-
Prime Minister's questions (137)
-
Topical questions (38)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (16,737)
+ Parliamentary committees (242) + Committee proceedings (89)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (58)
-
Select Committee reports (78)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (48)
-
Select Committee written evidence (32)
+ Parliamentary papers (798)
-
Annual reports (2)
-
Command papers (38)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (393)
-
House of Commons papers (192)
-
House of Lords papers (8)
-
Impact assessments (3)
-
Treaties (18)
-
Unprinted command papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (163)
-
White papers (4)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (1,178) + Debates (313)
-
Adjournment debates (98)
-
Backbench debates (4)
+ Committee proceedings (89)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (58)
-
Debates on select committee reports (8)
-
Emergency debate applications (2)
-
Emergency debates (1)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (60)
-
Debates on bills (47)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
+ Monarch's speech debates (13)
-
Queen's speech debates (13)
-
Opposition days (16)
-
Questions for short debate (12)
-
Topical debates (1)
+ Formal proceedings (3)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (3)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
-
Private notice questions (16)
+ Statements (772) + Oral statements (282)
-
Business statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (269)
-
Written statements (490)
-
Urgent questions (20)
+ Written corrections (14)
-
Ministerial corrections (14)
+ Parliamentary questions (9,767)
-
Business questions (123)
+ Oral questions (1,952)
-
Prime Minister's questions (137)
-
Topical questions (38)
-
Private notice questions (16)
-
Urgent questions (20)
-
Written questions (7,656)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
+ Research briefings (88) + Commons Briefing papers (69)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (11)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (5)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)
-
POSTnotes (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, Amendment 55A stands in my name. It is rather a late amendment, and this is the first time I have spoken on the Bill. I apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, for inadvertently gazumping his amendment on Clause 48 standing part of the Bill. I look forward...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc668-670
House
House of Lords

I oppose Clause 48 standing part of the Bill. There are two issues here. One relates to the wrecks that contain military remains; the other relates to diving activities related to those wrecks, which the Bill will describe as protected places. My contention

is that insufficient detail has been provided...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc670-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had two fascinating speeches from noble Lords who have considerable expertise and interest in the questions of military remains. I will be interested in the Minister’s responses, particularly to the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord Dannatt, that further work be done on this clause. Again,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c672
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am probably about to provide a less fascinating speech. I endorse everything said by my noble friend Lord Parkinson and, as such, I am pleased to support his amendment. Clause 48 will automatically expand the protection provided by the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 to every...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc672-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who has contributed to the debate. I will start with Amendment 55A from the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson. I thank him for bringing that forward in relation to salvage claims against military and Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels via the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, which is...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc673-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his reply. As he rightly says, the technology and its increased availability to many more people is the reason why the broader changes that the Government are seeking to make through the Bill are so timely and needed.

On my Amendment 55A,...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c675
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

56: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Waived fees for indefinite leave to remain for spouses or children of serving or discharged members of the armed forces

(1) The Immigration and Nationality (Fees) Regulations 2018 (S.I. 2018/330) are amended as follows.

(2) In paragraph 2 of Schedule...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc675-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 56, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Harlech, for adding his name in support of it. I also thank the Royal British Legion for its guidance in drafting this amendment.

Amendment 56 proposes amending the nationality fees regulations of 2018 to waive fees for certain Armed...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc676-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 56 from the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, which would waive fees for indefinite leave to remain applications for spouses and immediate family members of serving personnel and veterans. I have tabled Amendment 66, which seeks to achieve the same outcome through...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc677-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Penn, and to attach my name to Amendment 57, which would provide for six weeks of fully paid paternity leave for servicepeople. The Committee will see that this is perhaps not the broadest alliance across the political spectrum...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc679-680
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak very briefly in support of the amendment in the name of the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, and that in the name of my noble friend Lady Penn. The shared aim of these amendments is to improve morale among our Armed Forces...

Member
Lord Harlech (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c680
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, has held His Majesty’s Governments, of whichever complexion, to account over the years, particularly, as he mentioned

earlier, over the rights of the Hong Kong military. He rightly reminds us that all the main parties gave commitments to waive...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc680-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn first to Amendment 56, tabled by the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig of Radley, and supported by my noble friend Lord Harlech. I am pleased to be able to say that we on these Benches support this amendment. We have already waived the fees for...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the hour, let me deal with this head on. I shall start with Amendment 56, tabled by the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig. The Government, the Opposition and all of us, it seems to me, are committed to scrapping visa fees for non-UK

veterans who have...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc681-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, the Minister answering my question in such a positive way is very encouraging. It certainly made my day—or perhaps I should say it has made my night. I also thank the noble Baronesses and the two noble Lords who spoke in favour of my amendment, which...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c683
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Goldie

58: After Clause 50, insert the following new Clause—

“Overseas operations and the European Convention on Human Rights

(1) The Human Rights Act 1998 is amended as follows.

(2) For section 7A (limitation: overseas forces proceedings) substitute—

“7A No proceedings for overseas operations

(1) No proceedings may be brought under section 7(1)(a) in...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c683
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there may be some among your Lordships who looked at this amendment in my name and had a flash of déjà vu. That is because, of course, we have in some manner been here before, except that I was the one facing a grilling from noble Lords, rather...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc683-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we generally agree that our country needs our Armed Forces, including the reserves and the cadets, more than ever. We need to encourage people to join, and we need to look after them when they do. We ask them to risk their lives on our behalf....

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc686-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to both the noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, and the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, for their introduction to the amendment and for explaining it in detail. I am not a lawyer, so forgive me for not being able to respond to some of the cases...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc687-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Baroness, Lady Goldie, for introducing her amendments, and acknowledge the points she has made. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, for his contribution to the debate. I say to him that clearly—not only in the context of this Bill but also within a...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c688
House
House of Lords