Skip to main content

101-150 of 77,000 results for subject:Devolution

Type

-
Early day motions (157)
+ Legislation (253) + Acts (29)
-
Public acts (29)
+ Bills (83) + Public bills (83)
-
Government bills (36)
+ Private members' bills (47)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (20)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (12)
-
Ten minute rule bills (12)
+ Delegated legislation (141)
-
Statutory instruments (141)
+ Members' contributions (69,334)
-
Business questions (406)
-
Maiden speeches (101)
-
Oral answers to questions (3,171)
-
Oral question time interventions (73)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (148)
-
Points of order (22)
-
Proceeding contributions (62,687)
-
Speaker's rulings (2)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,429) + Committee proceedings (847)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (339)
-
Select Committee reports (248)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (107)
-
Select Committee written evidence (279)
+ Parliamentary papers (1,438)
-
Annual reports (27)
-
Command papers (127)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (8)
-
Deposited papers (515)
-
House of Commons papers (616)
-
House of Lords papers (115)
-
Impact assessments (28)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (39)
-
White papers (10)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (2,428) + Debates (1,661)
-
Adjournment debates (68)
-
Backbench debates (22)
+ Committee proceedings (847)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (339)
-
Debates on select committee reports (28)
-
Debates on treaties (3)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (4)
-
Emergency debates (4)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (976)
-
Debates on bills (729)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (246)
+ Monarch's speech debates (30)
-
King's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (27)
-
Opposition days (20)
-
Questions for short debate (20)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (3)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (5)
+ Statements (709) + Oral statements (185)
-
Business statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (169)
-
Select Committee statements (6)
-
Written statements (524)
-
Urgent questions (13)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,072)
-
Business questions (406)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (148)
-
Private notice questions (5)
-
Urgent questions (13)
-
Written questions (3,266)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (274) + Commons Briefing papers (182)
-
Briefing papers on bills (26)
-
Constituency casework (1)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (39)
+ Lords Briefing packs (2)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (2)
+ Lords In Focus (3)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Topical (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (40)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (19)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (17)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)
-
POSTnotes (8)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My noble friend is right that some of these KPIs relate to wider economic circumstances than the railway currently has, but we discussed on the first day in Committee the fact that the need for a long-term freight target is so that GBR focuses on its own part in growing...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc335-6GC
House
House of Lords

Where does it say the CEO is the accounting officer?

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c336GC
House
House of Lords

What I would say to the noble Lord about all these things is that we are setting this organisation up and, conventionally, it is the chair and the board that support, hire and fire the chief executive. I do not believe that his amendment is the right way of doing...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc336-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill should be amended to say that the business plan is annual, especially as that is the Government’s clear intention. The Minister has just said the business plan is going to be annual and it was precisely to get stakeholder engagement with business away from the annual...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c337GC
House
House of Lords

I think I understand what the noble Lord is saying. I am expecting an organisation, as GBR will be, to be constantly in discussion with the wider railway industry and the supply industry, and indeed its customers, simply because, as we have discussed, the market will change over time. I...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c338GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister has just changed the story. A moment ago, he was saying that engagement with business stakeholders would be through the business plan. Now he is saying that it is not actually through the business plan once a year—because anyway, we do not know it is going to be...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c338GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble Lord that the supply chain is crucial. Actually, for much of the supply chain, what really makes a difference is the five-year periodic settlement. That highlights the need for this engagement to go on, both at the time when the five-year plan is formed and...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc338-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who took part in this interesting debate. To my mind, we established one or two rather important propositions.

The first is that, when the Government are setting out their statement of objectives, in relation to which GBR writes its business plan, it would be...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc339-340GC
House
House of Lords

If I may intervene on the noble Lord, for once, I say to him: welcome to the five-year funding periods. We are now in control period 7, I think. The process that was described is complex, but it works remarkably well, which is why the industry and the Government are...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c340GC
House
House of Lords

I take that point, but, of course, that is if the financial assistance under this is restricted to infrastructure, which we debated a short while ago. If there is a requirement to notify of the financial assistance, I do not see it at the moment. The Minister might have a...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c340GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 5 to 11 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to. Clause 12 agreed to. Schedule 2 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Answering member
Lord Moylan
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc277-340GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Pidgeon

22A: Clause 5, page 4, line 5, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c277GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, had hoped to be here today but found himself with other commitments, and therefore asked me to move his Amendment 22A, which I also support. This is a probing amendment on whether the provision in the Bill which enables Great British Railways to...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc277-8GC
House
House of Lords

I think it might fall to me to speak next, if my noble friend does not want to speak to his amendments at this stage.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c278GC
House
House of Lords

I will speak at the end, if I may.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c278GC
House
House of Lords

I have four amendments in this group: Amendments 26, 64, 304 and 333. They are all on the same point, which is that, in the Bill, the definition of a “relevant local government body” is expressed as mayoral combined authorities, mayoral combined county authorities and passenger transport executives. Those first...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c279GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support what my noble friend Lord Lansley has said on his Amendment 26. I had some dealings on this when the Prime Minister was the Mayor of the Greater Manchester and when Andy Street was Mayor of the West Midlands. Both of them engaged...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc279-280GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to speak to the amendments in my name, Amendments 298, 299 and 300, which follow on from the amendments about which noble Lords have spoken. I want to double-check that there will be consultation with the relevant authorities—whether it is Scotland, Wales or other authorities—before...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc280-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I turn to the substance of this group, I would like to say that I received this morning from the Minister, as I imagine other noble Lords have, a letter setting out certain corrections to statements that he made on Tuesday. I have not had the opportunity...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc281-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we move on, I return briefly to a point raised in Committee on Tuesday on Amendment 146, regarding the long-term rail strategy and its relationship with devolved railway responsibilities. I was less than clear on this issue when we discussed it previously and thought it would be...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

I have a quick question. Why, then, is there not a similar provision saying that the rail strategy may not make provision about the functions of Welsh Ministers?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

The answer is that the infrastructure arrangements in Wales are significantly different and Wales does not have its own settlement in that respect. I reassure noble Lords that engagement between the Government and Scottish and Welsh Ministers on both strategies is productive and will continue until their publication. I am...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister concludes, may I respond, since I was one of the Members who raised this issue? I thank him for what he has just said and for the very helpful letter that he sent, to which the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, referred. I took the time to study...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc284-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord. We thought that we had been saved by the bell, but we were not, so I thought that it was right to put it right.

I should say to the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, that to my knowledge I do not have an email...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c285GC
House
House of Lords

It is on its way in a matter of seconds.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c285GC
House
House of Lords

On group 1, of course this matter is of significance to this Government, with a new Prime Minister, and I firmly believe that the Bill already empowers mayors in local areas. I am clear that Great British Railways will not work unless it works for and with mayors and local...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc285-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his response to my amendments. To avoid us further returning to this issue, I should say that there are other amendments to exactly the same purpose that I did not notice had not been grouped together, in Clauses 16 and 83 and elsewhere in the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc286-7GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord. I am particularly grateful for his suggestion that we debate this only once. I have listened carefully to what he has just said and I will reflect on it, as I said I would do on the rest of the subject. I am...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc287-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister sits down, I am very grateful for his response to my amendments, but on the relationships between local authorities and central government, we already have an example in the south-west—and, I think, in south Wales—where the train operators and the local authorities have come together...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c288GC
House
House of Lords

In quick answer to my noble friend, the only reason it should be procured centrally is because improved wifi is needed on every railway service in Britain. Therefore, the department is determined to deliver it on all those services, and fragmenting the procurement would lead only to increased cost and...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c289GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that illustrates a point. The Minister talks of devolution, but everything is flowing one way, so I will come back to this point. It arose in relation to Scotland—and, I think, also Wales—on Tuesday. GBR will be obliged to consult with local authorities on matters of...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c289GC
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord is in a different place in his imagination of this. These proposals will generally originate with GBR. Its structure, which I described on the first day in Committee, will be organised locally and regionally and so it will know how those proposals are going to...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c289GC
House
House of Lords

I was really pleased to hear the Minister say how devolution is of such importance to the Government. We have had an interesting debate. I am glad he has committed to take this away and see what can be done with the proposal in Amendment 22A and reflect on the...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c290GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

32: Clause 7, page 5, line 29, leave out from “section” to “in” in line 30

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and the amendment in the name of Lord Lansley to Clause 7, page 5, line 36, would remove the exclusion of issues including access to infrastructure, the infrastructure capacity...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c290GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are two sets of issues in this group. Mine is terribly simple and it is by way of a question to the Minister, just to be clear.

I do not understand why, in Clause 7, at the point the Secretary of State may give directions to Great British...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c290GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly to Amendments 35 and 36, which are in the names of my noble friends Lord Grayling and Lord Moylan.

Respectively, they deal with amending Clause 7, on the power to give directions, and Clause 9, on the power to give guidance to GBR. They...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc290-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments cover directions and guidance from the Secretary of State. They push for greater transparency around those, which is something that we really support. Information that has supported key decisions and directions should be placed in the public domain. It is really important that Great British Railways...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c292GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 37 in my name, which is a probing amendment. It would limit the power of the Scottish Ministers to issue directions to GBR to circumstances where a KPI has been missed or performance has not been up to snuff.

I do not advance that...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc292-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for their contributions to this group.

On Amendments 32 and 33, tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, access to railway infrastructure is a reserved matter. It is important that access and timetabling decisions make sense across the entire rail network; therefore, there...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc293-4GC
House
House of Lords

On my Amendment 37, if the Minister insists on responding solely in the literal sense to explicitly probing amendments—seeking in this case to work out how a conflict in directions

between Scottish Ministers and the Secretary of State, for example, might be addressed—all he does is encourage further amendments to...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c294GC
House
House of Lords

I believe I did answer the noble Lord: the memoranda of understanding between Scottish Ministers and this Government, and between Welsh Ministers and this Government, set out the processes by which these things will be co-ordinated. Were there to be any real difficulty in the circumstances he is describing, we...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c295GC
House
House of Lords

We are grateful to the Minister for his explanations—for my part, on Amendments 32 and 33. The Minister explained why the Bill says that, for reason of reserve powers, the consent of Scottish or Welsh Ministers is not required. This is an opportunity to make it clear that, if we...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c295GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Evans of Guisborough

38: Schedule 1, page 64, line 10, leave out from “may,” to “the” in line 11 and insert “at the recommendation of the Office of Rail and Road in relation to matters related to safety and standards, and after consultation with”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would require...

Member
Lord Evans of Guisborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc295-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 38 I will speak briefly to my Amendments 39, 41, 42 and 44 in this group. This group concerns Schedule 1, on the granting of the licence to Great British Railways, and the possible granting of licences to persons other than Great British Railways, to...

Member
Lord Evans of Guisborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c296GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have two amendments in this group. The purpose of Amendments 43 and 45 is to explore the circumstances in which the Secretary of State or the Office of Rail and Road grants a licence to a person other than Great British Railways to operate railway assets in...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc296-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak briefly to Amendment 46 in the names of my noble friends Lord Grayling and Lord Moylan, which I think is a probing amendment. It would remove proposed new Section 8(6) in Schedule 1, which says:

“The Office of Rail and Road may not grant a licence...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c297GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendments in this group are about strengthening the requirements for Great British Railways before it is able to grant a licence and to strengthen the Passengers’ Council in areas such as safety and standards. They would also strengthen the role of the Office of Rail and Road,...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c298GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friends Lord Evans of Guisborough, Lord Lansley and Lord Grayling for their amendments in this group. I will address Amendments 41, 42 and 44 first.

The Government have repeatedly emphasised the importance of independent regulation under the new system. They tell us that the ORR...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc298-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to hear from noble Lords on this group, and it is a special pleasure to hear from the noble Lord, Lord Reay.

Amendments 38 and 39 would undermine one of the fundamental principles that the Bill seeks to establish. The Secretary of State will set the...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc299-300GC
House
House of Lords

Can I ask the Minister why, if it is not necessary to create a statutory consultation requirement, it is necessary to have a consultation requirement in relation to the Passengers’ Council? Can it not respond to the consultation on a licence in the same way as Scottish or Welsh Ministers...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c300GC
House
House of Lords