Skip to main content

41-60 of 4,194 results for subject:Dissolution

Type

+ Legislation (13) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (4,044)
-
Business questions (34)
-
Maiden speeches (28)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,998)
-
Speaker's rulings (4)
+ Parliamentary committees (25) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (17)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (55) + Debates (36)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (12)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (73)
-
Business questions (34)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (18)
+ Research briefings (29) + Commons Briefing papers (18)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords In Focus (2)
-
Lords In Focus - House of Lords (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, we laugh, and in some ways, it is amusing. It is also extraordinary—I am not sure that it is amusing. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an Act of its time whose main purpose was to protect the coalition Government, and it succeeded in that to a degree. I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc859-860
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I say to the noble Baroness that this Bill did receive detailed pre-legislative scrutiny; it was considered by a Joint Committee of both Houses and Ministers were scrutinised by committees in both Houses. Ministers in both Houses—I have had some...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

Just to help the Minister, that is exactly the point I was making about the Fixed-term Parliaments Act not having proper scrutiny and getting us into the position we are in now.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

I was agreeing with the noble Baroness on that. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an aberration from 2011 to 2022. Some noble Lords have expressed shock that the House of Commons would wish to return to an arrangement which endured for generations. I do not share that shock.

The noble Lord,...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc860-1
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reason for disagreeing to a Lords amendment. The Lords amendment not insisted on and the Commons reason agreed to.

Lead member
Lord True
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc855-861
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.

The Bill passed through the other place, where it was carefully scrutinised and amended in only one respect: to seek to retain a role for this honourable House in respect of Dissolution. The Lords amendment provided that the Prime...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I am hugely relieved to hear the Minister say that. I have stood in every election since 1997. Only when we saw the chaos caused by a Government who did not want to continue and an Opposition who did not want the chance to face an election could we see...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend; there is of course a good reason why the 2017 to 2019 Parliament is referred to as the zombie Parliament.

I remind the House of the commitments that both parties made in 2019. The Conservatives committed to repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm that, if we dismiss Lords amendment 1 today, the courts will not have a role in fixing the dates for elections, because, surely, that is matter for us, answerable to the electors?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is quite right that it is not productive, and, in fact, it would not be in the interests of the judiciary themselves, for the courts to have such a role.

We committed to repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, as it had led to paralysis at a time...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc642-3
House
House of Commons

The right hon. and learned Gentleman has mentioned what happens in the event of a minority Government. What would happen where the Prime Minister of a minority Government wished to call a general election, but there was the possibility of an alternative Government being formed? Would that Prime Minister be...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

I do not want to get into hypotheticals, but what I will say is that the pre-2011 position worked extremely well. There is a reason why it worked well and it was proven to have functioned correctly. We seek to go back to a proven, tried and tested system, which...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. and learned Friend share my disbelief at some of the opposition to the current position, especially as we recall the chaos that led to the last general election and the frustration among the public when Parliament, in many people’s eyes, seemed to lose the respect of...

Member
Alun Cairns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

Good constitutional practice involves protecting the integrity of the legislature, the Executive and the judiciary and, in our view, the proposals do that and this amendment would not, so I agree with what my right hon. Friend says.

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

I sat on the Joint Committee that reviewed the 2011 Act and we spent long, productive and interesting hours looking at it. Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that it is really unproductive to look at our future arrangements in the context of what happened in 2019, just...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is completely right. In fact, it is difficult to expostulate all the different scenarios that may occur in future, so it is best to avoid that, but we know what worked well—the status quo ante the 2011 Act.

As I say, we have experienced the consequences of a...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc643-4
House
House of Commons

The Minister responded to the hon. Member for Thurrock (Jackie Doyle-Price) by saying that he fully agreed with her excellent statement, but he is in essence doing the exact opposite. Why this paradoxical situation?

Member
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

I am obviously not doing that. We are able to see where mistakes have been made and where things have gone well in the past, and we see that in the pre-2011 position—the position we are seeking to achieve and that Labour sought to achieve in its manifesto, as did...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

May I refer my right hon. and learned Friend to “The Crown”, of which I am sure he was an avid viewer? In answer to the intervention by the hon. Member for Cardiff West (Kevin Brennan), is my right hon. and learned Friend familiar with the Lascelles principles, as written...

Member
William Wragg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

The Lascelles principles are something we still respect. One of the fundamental tenets of Sir Alan Lascelles’ letter was the fact that we wished to avoid any suggestion that the sovereign be involved in politics.

The amendment, as I was saying, is silent on the issue of the negative consequences. The...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc644-5
House
House of Commons