Skip to main content

101-150 of 2,446 results for subject:Monarchy

Type

-
Early day motions (63)
+ Legislation (22) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (19) + Public bills (19)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (16)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (5)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (2,032)
-
Business questions (20)
-
Maiden speeches (6)
-
Oral answers to questions (102)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,817)
+ Parliamentary committees (26) + Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (40)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (18)
-
House of Commons papers (15)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (65) + Debates (37)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (29)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (4)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (18) + Oral statements (7)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (311)
-
Business questions (20)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Written questions (179)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (46) + Commons Briefing papers (41)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (5)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful for the kind things the noble Lord said to me, but the fact of the matter is that I do not know any of the leaders of my party. I do not know David Cameron—my noble friend Lord Cameron—or any of his successors. I simply will not...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative; Social Democratic Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

I do not accept that for one moment. The noble Earl is well known. His contributions are well known and valued—he must not undersell himself. The important thing is that there was an opportunity in 1999, when people left this House because they were hereditary Peers, for some to be...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord keeps mentioning the manifesto. Would he agree that, if I had a pound for every promise that had been in a manifesto from the Labour Party and the Conservative Party, I would be a billionaire?

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord must be happy that at least one manifesto commitment is being kept, and it is this one. We will deliver on it.

I conclude by saying that it is wrong to single out Peers for their contribution. All Peers have made a tremendous contribution to the work of...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Wolfson and the noble Lord, Lord Collins, for their contributions. I particularly express my thanks for another wonderful speech from my noble friend Lady Finn, who, to my mind, absolutely nailed it. I thank my noble friend Lord Blencathra in particular for...

Member
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc80-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord True

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to end the connection between the possession of a hereditary peerage and obtaining membership of the House of Lords.”

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c16
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the effect of Amendment 1 is to underline the purpose of this Bill as ending entry here by the hereditary principle, but which does not endorse the wholesale removal of colleagues who are already here. There thus falls to me the lamentable duty to open Committee on this...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc13-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

If I may: this is Committee. The noble Lord can come in. I am concluding my remarks, but I will answer him later. We have seen in recent days the nature of negotiation with a big stick. That is not the House of Lords way, nor is it the way...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in considering the purposes of this Bill, it is necessary to remind ourselves of the circumstances in which our hereditary colleagues continue to sit in your Lordships’ House. They are here because of an agreement which was reached in 1999 that they would continue to sit in your...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord, but I think he said “the late Lord Irvine”; I remind him that the noble and learned Lord is not late.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c15
House
House of Lords

I apologise, both to the Committee and to the noble and learned Lord. I am delighted to hear that he is still with us. I am most grateful to the Leader.

The noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, gave those undertakings as Lord Chancellor—an office which then occupied a rather higher...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc20-17
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know if I am alone in having a sense of fear and anxiety about the state of the world at the present time. The fact that we are debating ourselves when, at the other end of the Corridor, they are considering the issues of security...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc18-22
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, because I agree with his starting point, which is that we find ourselves as a nation in a more perilous position, arguably, than we have been in in my lifetime and, in those circumstances, the prospect...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc19-23
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord. As ever, he spoke with a lot of logic, and I agree with so much of what he said—not quite everything—as I have with so many other people.

I want to comment on only one or two issues that arose...

Member
Earl of Kinnoull (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc23-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I much enjoyed the speech of my noble friend Lord Forsyth, particularly when my name was mentioned and the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, started murmuring on his Back Benches. What is less well known is that the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, used to represent an important part of...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc24-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise somewhat reluctantly to speak as an elected hereditary who defends the hereditary principle—but we will debate that in response to my Amendment 3, not now. However, I also accept that, if our time is up and we are to leave this House, as I said at...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc26-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must admit that the thought of the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, representing my noble friend Lord Strathclyde has slightly set me aside for a moment. I was wondering which particular bit he represented. Was it the bit from the neck up, from the waist down or everything...

Member
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc24-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the comments that have been made and for the different tone from the noble Lord, Lord True, which I welcome. I will just say one thing. The noble Lord spoke about a passing political Executive. He will know, as I do, that that is...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc26-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords with long memories will recall that my arrival in this House was somewhat unusual and speaks directly to both parts of my noble friend’s amendment. As the then Minister for Energy, I was taking a Bill through a Commons Committee shortly before the 1992 general election...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc29-7
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord—I always enjoy listening to his entertaining contributions—but we are discussing a specific amendment at the moment. He is making comments on things we will come to later in considering other amendments. This seems to be a Second Reading speech. I do not...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c31
House
House of Lords

I am doing precisely that by talking about the hereditary principle and the removal of the hereditaries. Both are central to what I am speaking about. I gave my experience from the point of view of a hereditary, and I am now addressing the key point about the Bill being...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc29-31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think it is a little bit much for the noble Baroness to give my noble friend Lord Moynihan a hard time for making what she said was a Second Reading speech. The fact is that

we had Second Reading nearly three months ago—there is no reason for...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc31-2
House
House of Lords

I hate to intervene on noble Lords, but I do so because I do not like to be misrepresented by the noble Lord, or any other noble Lord in this House. I did not say that noble Lords have to pass the Bill before any discussions take place. I said...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

I am more than happy to agree with the noble Baroness on procedural shenanigans, which I must say I do not recognise at all over the course of the last few months. I am not doing any procedural shenanigans; I am actually replying to the noble Baroness, but I have...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Has the noble Lord finished his remarks, because I do not want to encourage him to go on at length? I wish to respond to the point about why Labour Members have not spoken, but is he wishing to get up again? I do not want to intervene on him,...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Feel free.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c32
House
House of Lords

Well, I have been waiting to say this for a long time, but I have managed to keep quiet. It was nine years ago that I first brought in a Bill to end the system of by-elections, which, had it been enacted, would have substantially solved the problem—and I think...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc32-4
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord is correct, why did the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, use the words “binding in honour”?

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I cannot possibly interpret at this juncture the views of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine—I know that the noble Lord, Lord Howard, has resurrected him during this debate. I really do not know precisely why he used the wording, but I know the context in which that “agreement”...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the noble Lord giving way. Does he recognise Alastair Campbell’s book when he said that he was very astonished that Viscount Cranborne did the deal and that it was only going to end in tears for him?

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

One person asked me to answer for Viscount Cranborne and I am now expected to answer for Alastair Campbell. The noble Lord needs to ask my good friend Alastair Campbell about that, but I know the facts are precisely as I described. Please do not take my word for it;...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

I totally understand why the noble Lord cannot be expected to answer for the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine, or anyone else, but perhaps he could answer for himself. He is quite right—magnanimity in victory—that he has got what he was asking for. If he thought that it was...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c34
House
House of Lords

What has changed is that there was a general election, and this was a manifesto commitment. Broadly speaking, it is a good idea to obey manifesto commitments. The longer answer to the noble Lord’s question is that I was not the first to introduce such a Bill; Eric Lubbock was...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord, who should be a little more cheerful having achieved what he set out to do, not accept that there were many of us who were not in this House and therefore unable to support his Bill or otherwise?

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Order! I do not think that the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, was giving way; he had sat down. The time had already been exceeded under the rules of the Companion. In terms of the Companion, is it not time that the noble Lord, Lord True, indicated whether he was pressing...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want to make a comment. At the moment, the Prime Minister is on his feet at the other end, as the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, pointed out, talking about issues of national security and the defence of the nation. Our debate does not hold up terribly...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

Hear, hear to that—I could not agree more with the Leader of the House. We should not be debating this at this time at all, and we are in risk of rendering ourselves irrelevant and foolish by debating these matters when things of far greater importance are going on. But...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c35
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, made reference to me. I want to put it on the record, because he has said it before, that the amount of time that I spoke during the debates on his Bill in 2018—a Bill which had six hours of debate—was under twice...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c36
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think it is right for me to intervene. I say to the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, who asked me for an apology, that I make no apology for carrying out the policy of my Government when I was a Government Minister. The policy of the Government was...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc36-8
House
House of Lords

It may be pedantic to point out that it was rejected in the other place by 277. I never said that it was not in the ability of this House to send back an amendment if it chose to do so. I pointed out what happened in the House of...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

If I may borrow a phrase from a more prominent person than I, did I really say that? The joys of social media and smartphones are very wonderful. I stand corrected by the noble Baroness, but the point remains that there resides great wisdom in this House and there remains...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Earl of Caithness

2: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Overview

This Act makes the House of Lords a second chamber whose membership is wholly nominated by the Prime Minister.”

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c38
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we might think that we know what most of the consequences of this Bill will be for the British constitution, but they are far from clear to anyone who does not take a close interest in these matters, and they are not to be found in the Bill...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc38-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I read this amendment with some surprise, because the noble Earl says that everybody is going to be nominated by the Prime Minister. I was not nominated by the Prime Minister and there remains, I think, 20% of this House who were not. As far as I know,...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c39
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was going to speak to the last amendment. I will say very quickly now that it needed a little bit inserted to say, “Also to remove the power of the Prime Minister to have total control over the membership of this House”.

I remember and was very involved...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc40-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, along with others, I share the concerns of my noble friend Lord Caithness, as I also much appreciate the comments of the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Butler-Sloss.

As already indicated, the priority aim for a reformed House of Lords must be its quality of function as a revising...

Member
Earl of Dundee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc41-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Earl, Lord Dundee, has just indicated the difficulty of discussing some of the broader issues that this Bill raises when we have so many different groupings. I suggest, in the very constructive spirit of the noble Lord, Lord True, when he opened the debate on the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c41
House
House of Lords

On the question of groupings, I understand that the Opposition put forward some suggestions for groupings to the Government Whips’ Office at the end of last week, and they were rejected without even being looked at until the Government had put forward their own proposals. That is my understanding.

I think...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c42
House
House of Lords

The first four separate amendments seem to me to have a very natural linkage, and it would have been much more sensible to debate them in a group, for example.

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords