Skip to main content

201-300 of 7,358 results for subject:Software

Type

-
Early day motions (18)
+ Legislation (43) + Acts (5)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (35)
-
Statutory instruments (35)
+ Members' contributions (3,524)
-
Business questions (7)
-
Maiden speeches (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (275)
+ Oral questions (278)
-
Prime Minister's questions (19)
-
Topical questions (17)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,971)
+ Parliamentary committees (224) + Committee proceedings (86)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (34)
-
Select Committee reports (83)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (28)
-
Select Committee written evidence (29)
+ Parliamentary papers (413)
-
Command papers (23)
-
Consultation papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (196)
-
House of Commons papers (174)
-
House of Lords papers (9)
-
Impact assessments (7)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (3)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (265) + Debates (159)
-
Adjournment debates (22)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (86)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (34)
-
Debates on select committee reports (4)
+ Legislative debates (82)
-
Debates on bills (52)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (29)
-
Opposition days (2)
-
Questions for short debate (6)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (88) + Oral statements (28)
-
Ministerial statements (28)
-
Written statements (60)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (5)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (3,377)
-
Business questions (7)
+ Oral questions (278)
-
Prime Minister's questions (19)
-
Topical questions (17)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (3,089)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (13)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (9)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether her Department requires the use of open‑source software, open standards or open interfaces as part of its oversight and approval of major IT procurement across Government.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
121746
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Heidi Alexander
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
SI 2026/305
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Laid by
Dan Tomlinson
Department
Revenue and Customs
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
SI 2026/336
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment has she made of the potential security threat posed to police forces in England and Wales by the use of Chinese software connected vehicles.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
121206
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department has issued guidance to special advisers on using Google Docs.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
120844
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to help ensure that cervical screening appointments can be booked via the NHS app.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
121112
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to his Department’s press release entitled Government launches consultation on making public services quicker, easier and more secure to access with digital ID, published on 10 March 2026, whether Government by app will store all data together for digital IDs.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
120736
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what evaluation has been undertaken of the use of artificial intelligence and enhanced NHS App tools in supporting patients with complex needs; how progress is being monitored towards the commitment that 95% of people with complex needs will have...

Asked by
Alex Brewer (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
120539
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to develop a legislative framework for the use of facial recognition software by private companies.

Asked by
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2026
Reference
HL15283
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of enterprise software licensing practices on the ability of customers to run software across competing cloud platforms on equivalent commercial terms.

Asked by
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2026
Reference
119995
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what privacy protections are in place around the use of facial recognition software by private companies.

Asked by
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2026
Reference
HL15284
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what requirements are in place for private companies to inform their customers that facial recognition software is being used on the premises.

Asked by
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2026
Reference
HL15285
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to (a) support NHS trusts with software needs and (b) unify software across NHS trusts.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2026
Reference
117389
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on launching a national conversation on how we will build and use digital ID as the means to access public services digitally on a mobile phone or computer.

Lead member
Lord Collins of Highbury
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc940-952
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Statement was delivered just one week ago and has already run into some serious difficulty. Reports in the press suggest that both the Health Secretary and the Education Secretary have made it clear that their departments will not provide some of the data required for the scheme....

Member
Earl of Courtown (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc942-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for this opportunity to respond to last week’s Statement and, indeed, for his personal engagement with us at that time.

The Chief Secretary told the Commons on Tuesday that he was continuing the proud Labour tradition of building public services for the many. He invoked...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc944-6
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Earl and the noble Lord for their contributions. The noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, is asking me questions to which, as he very well knows, I am not going to give the answer. That is the whole point of the consultation, and across the Chamber, everyone knows...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc946-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I take it from what the Minister has just said about costs that no sum has been earmarked in the current three-year expenditure review for the development of the scheme—can he confirm that? Secondly, will people in Scotland have to access the Government’s proposed ID scheme for...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c947
House
House of Lords

We will consult the devolved authorities on this; they will be a major part of the consultation. There is no definite cost for the

programme because the design of what we are building has not been decided yet. Noble Lords should not just look at one line item on the...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc947-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as the co-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Digital Identity. The Minister said that he will consult widely on this and on what support there might be for it. Nearly 3 million people have signed the petition. If they have not already convinced...

Member
Baroness Uddin (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c948
House
House of Lords

On the noble Baroness’s last point, how we look at inclusion and accessibility is really important in tackling those issues of discrimination. It is very important that the consultation looks at that. The noble Earl also raised a question about the NHS app which I did not explicitly address. That...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc948-9
House
House of Lords

I very much welcome the deliberative aspect of this consultation. It is good to see the Government doing that, and I hope it goes into other areas. I want to associate myself with many of the questions that the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, asked. Hopefully over this consultation period they...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c949
House
House of Lords

I cannot be too prescriptive, but I can reassure the noble Baroness on her first point; a number of noble Lords have raised this issue. This will be a sovereign-based scheme. We will develop it in-house through government services. It will not be contracted out. On her other point on...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c949
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his update. First, can I take him back to a slightly more fundamental question that we are yet to address in this exchange? Why do the Government feel it is necessary at all to have a consultation, given the visceral public reaction to...

Member
Lord Kempsell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c949
House
House of Lords

I keep coming back to the point that when we are looking at public services and people’s access to them, there is a solution here that most people would be very happy about—but we will not determine that unless we have a fuller consultation.

On the value-for-money element, the deliberative process...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c950
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse what my noble friend has said; I hope we all give this a great deal of support. Does he agree with me that it is a great pity that the pilot scheme abolished by the coalition Government in 2010 was not allowed to run? All the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c950
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend. When we all sit down and have a sensible discussion about this and try to take the partisan politics away, we will reach a much better consensus. This consultation enables us to do that.

At the outset, we have to put at the forefront of...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc950-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, in applauding the Government’s commitment in this Statement to deliberative democracy. That is an innovative step forward, but I am sure the Minister will want this Statement to be accurate, so I point out that it says:

“This will not be a...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c951
House
House of Lords

I do not agree at all. I think that 14% of people do not have some of the things that the noble Baroness referred to, but the world is changing very fast and if we are to address financial exclusion, inclusion and accessibility, this process can address many of those...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c951
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome my noble friend’s points about the consultation process; there is a great deal to consult about. As one Tesco consumer to another, can my noble friend confirm that, almost irrespective of the consultation, the Government are determined to allow an individual, if they wish, to delete...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c951
House
House of Lords

Let me address the first question. This is not a mandatory scheme and, certainly, if people have a digital ID, they can say they do not want it. I do not anticipate any circumstances where a Government would want to take away something that lets people access public services, but...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c951
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as ever with many big government ideas, there is a solution that is yet to find a problem.

I am yet to hear a ministerial Statement on the very serious data events that happened at Companies House over the last week. I have not heard a Statement from Ministers...

Member
Lord Mackinlay of Richborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 cc951-2
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord knows that I cannot possibly answer on his latter point, but I certainly will ensure that he gets a response about it. It is interesting that he was, I think, making the case for what we are proposing. The problem is that different government departments have different...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 March 2026
Reference
854 c952
House
House of Lords

My Lords, NHS Digital services are built and run to rigorous Government Digital Service standards. They are secure, user-centred, interoperable and continually improving. National Health Service England has significantly expanded its in-house engineering and data capability, and it is reducing its reliance on outsourced systems and strengthening operational resilience. These measures ensure that health and care data is available in all clinical settings to improve outcomes for patients, while delivering value for money to the taxpayer.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c658
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that reassuring Answer. The NHS has had a disastrous history of outsourcing its IT technology, which has wasted millions of pounds. A requirement of outsourcing is that there must be sufficient in-house expertise to properly assess the need for outside assistance and the quality of whatever assistance is on offer. In the absence of such expertise, outsourcing can be perilous. Moreover, given the requisite in-house expertise, outsourcing may become unnecessary. At a time when a host of novel IT solutions are becoming available, the IT staff of NHS England are seeing their numbers radically reduced. At the same time, the NHS is becoming increasingly dependent on the services of large American IT corporations. Can we be assured—genuinely assured—that history will not be repeating itself?

Asked by
Viscount Hanworth (Labour; Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right to point out the history. The NHS previously relied very heavily on large, outsourced IT systems that, in some cases, led to inflexibility, high long-term costs and limited NHS control over core platforms and data. I was glad to arrange for my noble friend to meet the chief data and analytics officer at NHS England last Wednesday. I hope that, like me, he was reassured that NHS England has very much shifted its model towards building and operating critical digital services in-house, in line with the standards that I referred to in my initial Answer.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

My Lords, cyber security is an essential element in any system, but nowhere more so than when people’s health records are being maintained. Many security breaches are attributed, at least in part, to human error. What investment are His Majesty’s Government making to train front-line staff in the new systems and provide continuous professional development to achieve the 10-year digital healthcare plan?

Asked by
Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

The straightforward answer is that we are doing exactly that. It is important to say that our front-line digitisation—our move from analogue to digital—is not something for the sake of it; we are doing it because it is improving efficiency and outcomes. For example, a 94% coverage of electronic patient records is expected by the end of this month, and the digitally mature trusts show a 13% lower cost per admission. That is a prize worth having, but we can do it only through the systems and training that the noble Baroness seeks.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support what the noble Viscount said. The history of software in the National Health Service is nothing less than a disaster. Coupled with that is a very unfortunate situation where some of the companies that have been responsible for these messes in the NHS are still on the Government’s procurement lists and are still getting contracts from the Government. Surely more attention should be paid to that, and we should curb that as soon as possible.

Asked by
Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord has particular companies in mind, he is most welcome to raise them with me. It is important that we look at what NHS teams have done: they have designed, built and maintained

national platforms. The NHS app is an example; I am sure that many noble Lords will be familiar with it. That is going to be our digital front door to the NHS. In addition, there is the NHS login and core national infrastructure. All these mean full NHS ownership, governance and control. Supported by £2.5 billion of investment in 2025-26, we are, as the noble Lord seeks, expanding NHS in-house digital capability to reduce the reliance on large suppliers.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c659
House
House of Lords

My Lords, last week’s catastrophic attack on Stryker by Iranian-linked actors paralysed supply of some critical surgical equipment across the NHS. Does the Minister agree that our total reliance on vulnerable third-party global medtech platforms is a serious security risk? How will the Government ensure in-house expertise and procurement software so that the NHS can bypass compromised commercial networks during such crises?

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c660
House
House of Lords

Cyber attacks across our whole government are extremely concerning, and that is why we have built resilience. On health and social care specifically, I can assure the noble Lord that, in 2025-26, we invested £75 million across health and social care; that built on the £375 million invested since 2017. When I had responsibility for the blood transfusion service, my own experience was that, where there was a cyber attack, we had the systems in place.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is always a very difficult balance between keeping something in-house or outsourcing it, and we should not forget the national programme for IT in the NHS in the early 2000s, which ended up costing between £10 billion and £20 billion. My question is on the company Palantir. The Minister will be aware that there are a range of views on Palantir. Some say that it is the best software available and that no one can match it; others say that they are worried that it will lock the NHS in long-term and scrape data for other uses. What specific measures have NHS England and the department put in place so that, in the event that the Palantir contract is not renewed, the healthcare system will be able to move seamlessly to another supplier?

Asked by
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c660
House
House of Lords

That seamless movement is an important point generally, but the federated data platform does not centralise or sell patient data. Data remains firmly under NHS control, and access is strictly governed. It is fully auditable and used only for approved patient benefit and NHS benefit. Palantir operates strictly under the instruction of NHS England and it does not, as I said, own or control NHS data. That access is tightly governed. In response to the earlier question, I note that the federated data platform to which the noble Lord refers is cyber resilient and subject to rigorous contractual, legal and information governance controls.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my question also relates to the federated data platform. I am sure the noble Baroness is aware that more than 50,000 patients have written to their local trust boards asking not to have their data placed on it. The Greater Manchester ICB, serving 2.8 million patients, has said

that this does not present value for money and is a big public trust issue. Palantir is of course owned by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, who are closely associated with the Trump regime and have very right-wing and anti-democratic views. Does the Minister acknowledge that this association with Palantir is damaging our NHS?

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c660
House
House of Lords

I would first look at delivery: the federated data platform has enabled nearly 100,000 extra operations, removed over 600,000 patients from waiting lists and reduced unnecessary bed days by 15%, as well as driving a 10% improvement in cancer diagnosis—so people are being diagnosed sooner because the system is working more efficiently, and that is important. This is a three-year contract given in 2023. I refer the noble Baroness to the comments I made to the noble Lord, Lord Kamall, about the rigorous contract due diligence for all commercial agreements, including with Palantir.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c661
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is historically true that the NHS wasted a lot of money, but this was partly because the development of digital services was in-house. Currently, things are looking much better, and the classic example is the development of the NHS app. However, I will ask the Minister about the health research data service that will be established. Patients should have confidence in data that is used and collected for research, partly because of the recent report on UK Biobank, where the researchers published the codes they were using to access data for research. It has to be made absolutely certain that the public have the confidence in the data that is used.

Asked by
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c661
House
House of Lords

Absolutely—public confidence is really important, and the debate around this today perhaps emphasises the need to communicate the realities of what is going on. But giving the NHS greater control and long-term value for money, as well as protecting privacy and improving public trust while improving outcomes, is the way forward. But the noble Lord is quite right, and we will ensure that we seek to build that confidence still further.

Answered by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 c661
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what plans they have for sustaining and enhancing the in-house software capabilities of the NHS.

Asked by
Viscount Hanworth (Labour; Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2026
Reference
854 cc658-661
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the annual cost is of Government contracts for the licensing of a) Zoom, b) Microsoft, c) Amazon d) Google computing platforms for the civil service.

Asked by
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
118063
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered Government support for UK-based tech companies. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Peter Fortune
Answering member
Kanishka Narayan
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Debates
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc130-2WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered Government support for UK-based tech companies.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts. I am pleased to have secured this debate.

It is hard to measure the true economic value of the technology sector in the UK, but I think...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c130WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member on securing this important debate on Government support for UK-based tech companies. My Slough constituency is a huge tech and data hub; indeed, it has the second largest concentration of data centres anywhere in the world. Does he agree that it would be an act...

Member
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c130WH
House
House of Commons

I have a list of Government follies here, if the hon. Member would like me to pass them on. In all seriousness, I completely agree with him on the importance of the industry and those jobs, and I am sure that the Minister will pick that up when he responds.

To...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc130-2WH
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c132WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts—and I genuinely hope you have some good news about Sheffield Wednesday in the next few days.

Member
Chris Evans (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c107WH
House
House of Commons

I stand corrected, Mr Betts—I was in meetings all morning, so I have not seen the sports news yet.

For constituencies like mine, which were dependent on heavy industry, the development of high technology offers new growth opportunities that we can harness in our valley communities once again. I want to...

Member
Chris Evans (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc133-111WH
House
House of Commons

I recently visited the Nexus innovation hub at the University of Leeds, which does the things that my hon. Friend was just describing, with innovative spin-outs and companies genuinely innovating in really challenging areas. However, they struggle to access Government procurement because they do not have things like Cyber Essentials,...

Member
Mark Sewards (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c111WH
House
House of Commons

I am always happy to take interventions, but my hon. Friend seems to have written my speech for me, because I will develop that argument as I go along. I note he is from Leeds—Leeds pinch all of Sheffield Wednesday’s best managers, do they not, Mr Betts?

Spin-outs offer postgraduate students...

Member
Chris Evans (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc112-135WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Mr Betts. I congratulate the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) on securing this important debate. We have heard from both sides of the Chamber that the British tech sector spreads into all our constituencies, so it concerns...

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc135-114WH
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend share my view that, although we can be rightly proud of having the third most valuable tech ecosystem in the world, we cannot be complacent, especially amid increasing international uncertainty? Shearwell Data in my constituency is exactly the sort of business that he refers to. A...

Member
Rachel Gilmour (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c114WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her comprehensive intervention, which speaks to exactly the issues that I will raise.

The key example is DeepMind, which was the world-leading AI company. We, the Brits, failed to create the ecosystem, funding and risk-taking capital to enable it to scale fully. It was then...

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc115-136WH
House
House of Commons

I held a roundtable in my constituency with the Startup Coalition just two weeks ago. We found that one of the biggest barriers was not an absence of talent or expertise in my town, but a poverty of access to information, advice and guidance. No one had heard of small...

Member
Dan Aldridge (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c136WH
House
House of Commons

That is an excellent point. It is very much something that the Government can do, because they understand where capital can be found and how to create the legal and regulatory ecosystem that enables these companies to thrive.

Let me touch briefly on access to capital—I am thinking of slightly larger...

Member
Mike Martin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc117-137WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship today, Mr Betts. I thank the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) for securing such an important debate—a debate that is of significance to my constituency and the role it plays in supporting UK-based tech companies.

In my former...

Member
Alison Taylor (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc137-8WH
House
House of Commons

As always, it is a real pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Betts; thank you for all you do for us in relation to Westminster Hall. I also thank the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) for raising this issue and thereby giving us all an...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c120WH
House
House of Commons

I just want to pay tribute to a number of lecturers at the universities in Northern Ireland. I used to work for the British Computer Society and the Northern Ireland branch was phenomenal. If the hon. Gentleman has not yet made contact with that branch, to speak to it about...

Member
Dan Aldridge (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c120WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman very much for that intervention; it is always good to get an intervention that reinforces the point of view that I am putting forward. Obviously, he has a personal knowledge of this issue and we thank him for that, too.

Due to the dedication and focus...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc120-139WH
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Mr Betts. I congratulate the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) on securing this important debate. I suspect that, at this point, I am in danger of labouring the points already made by other hon. Members, but I...

Member
Edward Morello (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc140-121WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member mentions a specific sector of the tech economy. Does he agree that tech companies do best when they are clustered together, particularly in innovation zones, so that they can share emerging knowledge and technologies, and link in with academia?

Member
Alison Taylor (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c121WH
House
House of Commons

I certainly agree that, if we want to become a market or world leader in a particular technology space, it is vital that we channel funding and support into those areas where we have the most opportunity and a competitive advantage.

Climate technology is not only an environmental priority, but a...

Member
Edward Morello (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc121-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts. I commend the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) on securing this essential debate.

Entrepreneurship is in my blood. Both my parents ran their own businesses. My mum launched the website for her business over 15 years...

Member
Victoria Collins (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc123-144WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) on securing this incredibly important debate. He brings a unique blend of glamour and tech nerdery to the House. Frankly, it is something Parliament could...

Member
Julia Lopez (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc144-7WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mr Betts. I thank the hon. Member for Bromley and Biggin Hill (Peter Fortune) for securing this important debate on Government support for UK-based tech companies. I am grateful to him and to all other hon. Members across the...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc127-150WH
House
House of Commons

Shortly before the debate, the Minister said he would like to visit Weston-super-Mare and other locations. I invite him to beautiful West Dorset to visit the fibre optics company Sintela, which is one of the UK’s biggest success stories.

Member
Edward Morello (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c150WH
House
House of Commons

I have a 100% record so far of committing to visits when asked. I do not want to set too much of a precedent, but given the numbers in the room, I would be happy to take the hon. Member up on his kind offer as well.

The hon. Member also...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc150-2WH
House
House of Commons

I thank everybody for their contributions. Let me start with the party spokesmen. I pay tribute to the shadow Secretary of State, my hon. Friend the Member for Hornchurch and Upminster (Julia Lopez), for her wisdom and her towering intellect in recognising the self-evident glamour that is dripping from me...

Member
Peter Fortune (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc152-4WH
House
House of Commons

Statement on launching a national conversation on how we will build and use digital ID as the means to access public services digitally on a mobile phone or computer.

Lead member
Darren Jones
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc181-9
House
House of Commons

Today the Government are launching a national conversation on how we will build and use digital ID as the means to access public services digitally on a mobile phone or computer.

Public services are meant to be there at the most important moments of your life: free childcare hours to help...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc181-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for advance sight of his statement and for the briefing a short time ago.

It is said that in 1720, gullible investors were invited to put their money into

“a company for carrying out an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is”.

Today, the Chief...

Member
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc183-5
House
House of Commons

I enjoyed the hon. Member’s response to the statement, and I thank him for lifting our spirit with it. Let me say two things to him gently. First, I am very confident that, because the public do their banking and shopping online in a quick and convenient way, the fact...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c185
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Government’s decision to remove the mandatory element of digital ID, so that we can all focus on the benefits that easier access to public services should deliver for everyone. Usefulness, security and inclusivity are good principles, and I urge my constituents to take part in the consultation...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c185
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for her question; the Government look forward to working with her and her Select Committee as we develop these policies. She is absolutely right. We are focusing on building the app and the login system with digital ID, but the big prize in the years...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c185
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement. Let us be clear about why we are here. Following collapsing public support, strong opposition from the Liberal Democrats, a petition signed by nearly 3 million people—including over 5,000 of my constituents—and significant...

Member
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 cc185-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady and her colleagues for their engagement with the Government on this issue; we look forward to continuing to work with them on this. The good news is that on each of the principles she sets out, the Government agree wholeheartedly. I hope that means we...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c186
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c177
House
House of Commons

The general public need to be on board with this or it will be a complete and utter failure. When it comes to the most deprived and those who lack the technological abilities to access these systems, what is my right hon. Friend going to do to make sure he...

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c177
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is exactly right to call out the challenge of digital inclusion. We see in the private sector lots of services becoming digital but very little help for the public if they cannot use them. The great opportunity of this programme, as I said in my statement, is...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c177
House
House of Commons

Before I purchase something at the supermarket, I want to know what the price is. The Minister seems to be lacking clarity on how much this is going to cost. Can he give that clarity?

Member
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c177
House
House of Commons

The consultation asks many questions about how we should build, implement and roll out this system. I am absolutely happy to tell the House that as of today, we do not know the answer. I would rather be honest with the House, as opposed to announcing a budget for something...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

The state holds vast amounts of data on all of us from the moment we are born, some of which we never see, are never able to correct and never know who has been looking at it. Does the Minister agree that digital ID provides the opportunity for residents in...

Member
Jo White (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is exactly right. It is very difficult today to get information out of the public sector because it is often paper-based or on IT systems that we cannot access. With digital ID and the gov.uk app, citizens will have more control and more insight into how their...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

When asked by the hon. Member for Hazel Grove (Lisa Smart) whether he could guarantee that a digital identity requirement would never become mandatory, the Minister said he wholeheartedly agreed, but is it not the case that the original scheme that the Government were minded to put forward was mandatory,...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

First, the Prime Minister’s announcement was that it should be mandatory for digital verification of ID. This scheme enables that, but there are other routes available to people if they wish to follow them. The other commitment I can give the right hon. Member is that I suspect it will...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

Many people still have to repeatedly prove who they are to different parts of Government. Does the Chief Secretary agree that a trusted digital identity system could make public services simpler and more secure for citizens, while protecting privacy?

Member
Matt Bishop (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c187
House
House of Commons

That is exactly our ambition. We will all have constituents who struggle to get in touch with the right people with the right information and the right ability to make a decision when they are trying to access support or information. This will make it much easier for people to...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c178
House
House of Commons

I commend the Minister for admitting that he does not know how much this is going to cost, but it is almost six months since this became Government policy, and now he has decided that it is time to consult the public. Can he tell the House how much it...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c178
House
House of Commons

Any costs incurred so far have been purely for civil servants to pull together the consultation and for the Department to hold discussions and roundtables with stakeholders. Government will need spending authority from Parliament to start this scheme being built, and that will be part of the Bill that will...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c188
House
House of Commons

I am the mother of teenagers, and they cannot believe how difficult it is to access their data and interact with public services. They call it “cringe”, a bit like the response from the hon. Member for Kingswinford and South Staffordshire (Mike Wood). If we are to be a modern,...

Member
Emily Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c188
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with my hon. Friend. We have to remember that taxpayers pay for these public services, but they have nowhere else to go, unlike in the private sector, where they can go to someone else if they are getting a rubbish service. It is a requirement for...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
782 c188
House
House of Commons