Skip to main content

41-60 of 744 results for subject:Space

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (2) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (457)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (418)
+ Parliamentary committees (86) + Committee proceedings (47)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (43)
-
Select Committee reports (10)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
-
Select Committee written evidence (34)
+ Parliamentary papers (81)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (20)
-
House of Commons papers (57)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (133) + Debates (55)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (47)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (43)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (4)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (4)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (76) + Oral statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (8)
-
Written statements (68)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (97) + Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Written questions (78)
+ Research briefings (11)
-
Commons Briefing papers (5)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Topical (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (4)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The noble and gallant Lord is right to point out the importance of GCAP and how it offers a sixth-generation option for us after 2040, when Typhoon is expected to go out of service. There is money in the defence investment plan for the upgrade of Typhoon to ensure that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I say that this is a disappointment, to put it mildly? I am on the same side as the Minister on this. This, I assume, was what led John Healey to resign—I suspect that it was the same document. Given that, does he think that any other...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

There is an additional £1.5 billion, and there are also some changes with respect to the way in which there is a greater emphasis in this document on autonomy, AI and the transformation of the Armed Forces to have more new types of aircraft, vessels and capabilities. For me, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not clear that this is a welcome step forward, but that it cannot be the end of the story? We have to reaffirm our commitment to 3% by the end of this decade, and 3.5% by the middle of the next decade, as firm commitments of...

Member
Lord Liddle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

In terms of the spending, I have made the point about the 2027 spending review, and that the document lays out that we will come back to the 3% commitment at the 2027 spending review, and,

of course, the 3.5% commitment is laid out in the document as well. That...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1081
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Liddle, has just alluded to the elephant in the room, which is that there are no cuts to the £333 billion welfare bill, which would go a long way to helping with additional support for the defence industry. My worry is that most of these cuts...

Member
Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

I do not know about the ambitions for net zero. All I can say to the noble Baroness is that, of course, spending is important, and increasing the amount of spending on defence is important. Whatever decisions are made will require the reprioritisation of budgets for what the Government plan...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was head of the Treasury’s defence division, and I welcome all this concentration on the money, but the document is actually about investment and where the money is to be spent. Ukraine is making, using, and losing 7 million drones a year. The life cycle of any...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

I agree with that. In the document, it talks about the need for the transformation of our Armed Forces, and much of that will be around uncrewed capabilities and drones. It is not only about big primes; much of this, including in Ukraine as the example, is delivered by small...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the honourable exception of the noble Lord, Lord Kerr, much of our debate today, as in the many months leading up to the defence investment plan, has focused on the bottom line and where the money is coming from; we have, unfortunately, had far less debate about...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1082
House
House of Lords

“No” is the answer to the noble Baroness’s question. Homeland defence runs all the way through the document: how we have better air defence, what we do about improving the use of reserves, and various protections for our critical national infrastructure, which is really important. As I have said before,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put it to the Minister that it would have been better to have had the conversation with the public before we put out the policy, so that we had rolled the pitch and people understood the nature of the threat. I welcome, therefore, what he is saying...

Member
Lord Spellar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

The catastrophic decision to pick out of what my noble friend said—given the importance that I, the Government and Members across this House attach to this—was the delay in 2010 for a number of years in renewing the nuclear deterrent. That was a really bad decision, and as a result...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1083
House
House of Lords

What steps her Department is taking to maintain levels of funding for astronomy and space science.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
900736; 788 cc893-4
House
House of Commons

I draw the House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I am proud that this Labour Government have committed a record £86 billion towards R&D, including on astronomy, space science and others, to supercharge innovation. Within that, UK Research and Innovation’s Science and Technology Facilities Council—the main funder of particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics—has a stable budget with increasing investment in research areas that lead to and underpin discovery.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c893
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his answer. My Oxfordshire constituency is home to Harwell campus, the UK’s largest concentration of space and science organisations. Despite what the Minister said about the budget, the need for £162 million of savings by 2030 that was imposed on the Science and Technology Facilities Council risks jobs and critical research equipment, undermining our global science leadership. Does the Minister share those concerns, and what steps will he take to protect scientific jobs and facilities?

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the hon. Gentleman and everyone at the Harwell campus, which hosts over £1 billion of world-leading research infrastructure. A lot of concerns have been raised by the physics community about this issue. I can confirm that funding for STFC has not been cut. UKRI has decided that STFC’s core budget should be maintained over the spending review period. Of course, we understand the cost pressures through inflation, foreign exchange and the ambitious commitments that were made from the previous spending review. No final decisions are being made, but STFC is working through that with the community.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

Particle physics and astronomy have had a rough deal since the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council—PPARC—was abolished about 19 years ago. I understand that the justification being put out by the Science Minister and other Ministers is that there has been a change to mission-driven research as opposed to fundamental blue-skies research. This is a mistake: most practical applications of science have come from scientists asking fundamental questions that had no relevance at the time. Does the Minister agree that the policy is a mistake?

Asked by
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

I do not agree with my hon. Friend about the policy. We are putting £86 billion into research and development, including astronomy and space science, including a record £38 billion for UK Research and Innovation. Of that, £14.5 billion is for curiosity-driven research because we know that there is no route to stronger growth in this country than through significant investment in science, innovation and tech.

Answered by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
788 c894
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to retain specialist staff in the space research and development sector.

Asked by
Olly Glover (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 June 2026
Reference
9293
House
House of Commons