Skip to main content

21-30 of 305 results for subject:Technicians

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Draft Pharmacy Order 2010. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Amendment debated and disagreed to on division (21 votes to 44). Original motion agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Thornton
Answering member
Earl Howe
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c85-106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have tabled the Powers of Entry Bill, it is inevitable that I should say something on this matter, but I will be brief. First, I thank the Minister for her interest in the pharmaceutical industry and remind her, although she needs no reminding, that at the...

Member
Lord Selsdon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c97-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is clear that the House owes a great debt to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Scott, for raising this matter. It is a very important subject, which I predict will grow in importance. It is to the credit of the House of Lords that, very largely...

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c98-100
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness sits down, I may be able to save her some work. Instead of her writing to me, I will write to her tomorrow with the schedule of all the Bills. She can then confirm to me if it is correct, because I do make mistakes.

Member
Lord Selsdon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c105
House
House of Lords

I had sort of assumed that that was the case, but I take note of what the noble Lord has said. The noble Earl, Lord Howe, asked why there are different powers of entry for the Care Quality Commission’s inspectors. These powers stem from existing powers under the Medicines Act...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c102-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are three things I want to say in reply in support of my amendment. First, the Minister suggested that if an inspector were to enter premises without a warrant and was turned away, that would not by itself be a criminal offence. I believe her to be...

Member
Lord Scott of Foscote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c105-6
House
House of Lords

Thank you very much.

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c105
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of this order has already been explained by the Minister. It is to establish a new regulatory body—a new council—to regulate the conduct of pharmaceutical retail businesses, and to set standards for the practice of pharmacy at registered premises. It is a feature of the order...

Member
Lord Scott of Foscote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c91-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the order, which, as she indicated, ushers in a new era in the regulation of pharmacists in Great Britain. The creation of the General Pharmaceutical Council as the regulator for the pharmacy profession reflects the pattern that we now almost take for...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c88-91
House
House of Lords

My Lords, having sat on the Bench on which the noble Baroness is now sitting, I know that it is infused with a reflex which all government Ministers have to Motions of this sort, which is to resist them. In some way they clip a feather on the end of...

Member
Lord Elton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2010
Reference
717 c100
House
House of Lords