Skip to main content

41-60 of 207 results for subject:Teletext

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Although I have heard the noble Lord’s response, I will still make my points and hope to hear what he has to say again, or perhaps a varied version of it. This amendment seeks to limit the authority of the appointed manager to deal with the rectification of a specific...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c226
House
House of Lords

We take the view that the clause allows for the order to include these steps. The order, when taken, will define the steps asked for by the noble Lord. We do not think that it is necessary to put it in the Bill.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c227
House
House of Lords

If, as the noble Lord says, that is the purpose, why should we not include the amendment?

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c226
House
House of Lords

226A: Clause 19, page 21, line 11, at end insert— "( ) An order under section 124O must make provision about the steps that the Secretary of State considers appropriate for remedying the failure and any consequences of the failure."

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c226
House
House of Lords

Amendment 228A, but we have not got there yet. He jumped the gun a bit. I understand his anxiety to get through the business, but perhaps that is carrying it a bit too far. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw Amendment 226. Amendment 226 withdrawn. Amendment 226A...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c226
House
House of Lords

This is a probing amendment that is designed to highlight the concern that these words might open up the registry to a high level of liability. Remedying a serious failure by means of financial compensation could lead to claims for millions of pounds. Is this the Government’s intention? If not,...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

It is not often that I would disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, on a point of law. It is with the greatest temerity that I can even think of it. Equally, I do not think that it is as he says. The provision is far too broad and...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c227
House
House of Lords

Yes, it does. The noble Lord, Lord Cotter, made the point that there are something like 2.4 radios in his household. I always thought that that was the number of children in the average United Kingdom family. Certainly most households have more than one radio, apart from the impoverished or...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c284
House
House of Lords

Does the WEE directive apply to all those radios?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c284
House
House of Lords

I knew that my noble friend would light upon the most sophisticated of the technological changes to effect the best of all possible worlds. I understand entirely that radios create the problem of disposal, which is why the noble Lord, Lord Cotter, has raised the issue. As we know, there...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c283-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also support this amendment. There is some doubt as to how many radios are actually going to be available in this way, for two reasons. First, given the number of rooms that we have, a radio is quite a small thing and can be kept around. Secondly,...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c282
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness will have a chance to answer that. It is a difficulty that the Government also have. We are not against the broad thrust of the amendment. There is clear agreement about the problem that has been identified and which C4C has a duty to address. Pre-school and...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c238-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Howe, echoes what came into my mind as the amendment was put. Perhaps it would be helpful to have an explanation—I am sure that there are cogent reasons—why the age range of 10 to 15 has been chosen.

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c238
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have considerable sympathy with the amendment, but also a query about it. It has been very good news to hear from the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, that some of the material for children that has gone online has proved a great success. I should like to see...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c238
House
House of Lords

That is all very well, but the Minister has still not answered what I asked. I suggest that he reads my remarks in Hansard and looks at the Bill to see whether I am correct in the interpretation that this could be a compulsory activity by Channel 4. If he...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c235
House
House of Lords

What is compulsory is that Channel 4 fulfils its public service obligations, and the provisions in the Bill that we have identified here form part of those obligations. I am recoiling a little from the element of compulsion. We see Channel 4, over its history, as having fulfilled its remit...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c235
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I am any the wiser. Perhaps the Minister could look at what I said. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 231 withdrawn. Amendment 231ZA not moved. Amendment 231A Moved by

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c235
House
House of Lords

231A: Clause 21, page 23, line 26, leave out "in particular" and insert "including by providing access to information and views from around the world and"

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c235
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite the growth of the internet, television remains the main source of information about the wider world for most people in the UK. The aim of this amendment, in the names of the noble Baroness, Lady Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury, and myself, is to insert a simple and uncontroversial...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c236-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, C4C is content with this amendment and so are the Government. I intend to accept it. Amendment 231A agreed. Amendment 232 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List. Amendment 232A Moved by

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c237
House
House of Lords