Skip to main content

41-60 of 17,855 results for subject:Testing

Type

-
Early day motions (51)
+ Legislation (352) + Acts (12)
-
Public acts (12)
+ Bills (34) + Public bills (34)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (5)
+ Private members' bills (28)
-
Ballot bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (7)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (14)
+ Delegated legislation (306) + Statutory instruments (306)
-
Deregulation orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (9,674)
-
Business questions (52)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (570)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (588)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (31)
-
Points of order (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,508)
+ Parliamentary committees (277) + Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Select Committee reports (61)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (22)
-
Select Committee written evidence (46)
+ Parliamentary papers (874)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (75)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (9)
-
Deposited papers (586)
-
House of Commons papers (169)
-
House of Lords papers (15)
-
Impact assessments (82)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (13)
-
Treaties (9)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
+ Unprinted papers (9)
-
Draft deregulation orders (proposal) (3)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (747) + Debates (382)
-
Adjournment debates (63)
-
Backbench debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (4)
-
Emergency debate applications (2)
+ Legislative debates (227)
-
Debates on bills (150)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (77)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (13)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
-
Private notice questions (3)
+ Statements (338) + Oral statements (58)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (55)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (280)
-
Urgent questions (6)
+ Written corrections (7)
-
Ministerial corrections (6)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (6,775)
-
Business questions (52)
+ Oral questions (588)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (31)
-
Private notice questions (3)
-
Urgent questions (6)
-
Written questions (6,126)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (43) + Commons Briefing papers (19)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (10)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
POSTnotes (11)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the Minister for her response and the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey and Lord Markham, for their contributions. I cannot help feeling that the approach to this by the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, is coloured by his history as a Minister. I can understand that because I saw the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c189GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

164: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Computer Misuse Act 1990: statutory defence for cyber security activities

(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, carry out and publish a review of whether the introduction of a statutory...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c190GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 164 is in my name and, I am delighted to say, that of the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom. Sadly, he is tied up next door with matters of national security—I hope that I am not giving away any secrets—and is unable to speak to this...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc190-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, whether technically or in spirit. He is right to point out how outdated the Computer Misuse Act is and that its blanket prohibition on undertaking cyber security activities without any public interest defence is ridiculous.

The noble Lord’s...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c193GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the campaign to reform the Computer Misuse Act is at least 10 years old, not just five. We—including me—have been working to try to get the provision that is contained in the amendment before us from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. I endorse every single word that he...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc193-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly in support of the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which he so comprehensively set out. I did not mention this at Second Reading because I thought it was so self-evidently sensible that this needed to be fixed. I should know better, having...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the advantages of being in this Committee Room for these debates in Committee is that I can use Claude—I hope that is allowed—to answer the question of what the cyber security community thinks about the Computer Misuse Act. The answer comes back in bold. I will...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this amendment and the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, whom I see in his place. I am sorry he was unable to attend the beginning of this debate, but we are told it was for very good reasons....

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc194-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising this topic through his amendment, and I recognise the strength of feeling on reforming the Computer Misuse Act. I agree that the UK should have the right legislative framework to allow us to tackle the threats posed by cyber criminals.

The Home...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc195-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. The noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said that we know what the Minister will say: that it will be in a future piece of legislation. To that extent, we are pleased that at least we have a commitment to it, but this has been...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Markham

174E: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Increasing resilience by reducing data retention

(1) The Secretary of State must, within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, open a consultation on the potential impact of minimising data collection and increasing data anonymisation on the...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc196-7GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 174E in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Camrose and Lord Holmes builds on the point I made in the debate last Thursday that the best defence in cyber is, of course, not to present an attractive target in the first place.

I go back to my...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c197GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite the fact that this is the last group, it is a really important area and this amendment rightly reflects that. We strongly support Amendment 174E. It would introduce a fundamentally elegant and highly necessary cyber security principle that the Bill has otherwise completely ignored: that of data...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc197-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Markham, for raising this important issue again. Good data hygiene and security is essential to ensuring that public bodies are resilient to cyber attacks. Through the Bill, we are better protecting data, to make our essential services safer and more secure for all those...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc198-200GC
House
House of Lords

In the spirit of her final remarks on the Bill overall, is the Minister able to give any update as to when the national cyber action plan might emerge?

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords

I have nothing further to add what I have said in previous sittings.

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords

Nice try. I will get the final word then. First, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his strong support. Honey pot is a very descriptive and apt term for it. I thank the Minister for her comments and will definitely take up her offer of a meeting. I...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the assertion made by the then Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, in a June 2025 interview on Newsnight that there had been a cover-up concerning British veterans involved in nuclear weapons testing.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
HL3053
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the assertion of former Veterans' Minister, Tobias Ellwood, that the Ministry of Defence deliberately withheld medical records of veterans who oversaw nuclear tests.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
HL3054
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the treatment of nuclear test veterans in the United States and France; and what lessons they have learned from comparisons with those countries’ approaches to the provision of compensation for veterans affected by nuclear testing and their descendants.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
HL3055
House
House of Lords