Skip to main content

3601-3700 of 4,044 results for subject:"Data processing"

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (17) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (6)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (3,512)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (4)
+ Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,503)
+ Parliamentary committees (102) + Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Select Committee reports (11)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (8)
-
Select Committee written evidence (19)
+ Parliamentary papers (168)
-
Annual reports (2)
-
Command papers (11)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (107)
-
House of Commons papers (30)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Impact assessments (8)
-
Treaties (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (9)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (129) + Debates (117)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (66)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (37)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (8)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (104)
-
Debates on bills (91)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (13)
+ Statements (12)
-
Written statements (12)
+ Parliamentary questions (206) + Oral questions (5)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Written questions (201)
+ Research briefings (15) + Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Briefing papers on bills (6)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTnotes (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am not suggesting that breaches do not occur; I am not an apologist. My position is that if and when errors are made and wrongful acts occur, the law has ample means of dealing with them. We do not set up a massive public inquiry in areas of the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c235
House
House of Lords

I have two comments to make in response. First, the Leveson 2 inquiry was promised. As I understand the position of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, now, he is saying that maybe wrongdoing is going on and it is the same as was expected before, but promising Leveson 2 was...

Member
Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc235-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not going to speak, but I feel impelled to do so. I have no time for the media. I have been libelled and I disliked the experience a great deal. But what we are being asked to provide is a remedy. They are saying that the...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c236
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first declare my interest as a Times columnist. Perhaps I may also start by thanking the noble Baroness, Lady Hollins, for the opportunity to listen to what she had to say, which it was impossible to do without regarding it as moving and passionate and a cause...

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc236-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not a lawyer or journalist. If I was to describe myself as anything it is a jobbing politician. But each and every one of us in this House has to make their decision as a jobbing politician. Quite frankly, and with the utmost possible respect—I know...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc237-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I sense that the House wishes to move on, to hear from the Minister and move to the inevitable vote, which I think would be a good thing for all of us. Therefore I will not speak at length. We have had a really

important debate today, ranging...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc238-240
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government recognise that there is great deal of passion and genuine concern on all sides of the debate and on all sides of the House on these matters. I am obliged to the noble Baroness, Lady Hollins, for the passionate way in which she advanced her argument...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc240-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for his thoughtful response and to noble Lords who have spoken. I was accused of bullying the press during the last debate on this Bill in December, and of harassment today—astonishing accusations under the circumstances. These amendments are designed precisely to provide...

Member
Baroness Hollins (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc242-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

130: Clause 142, page 79, line 2, at end insert “to comply with the data protection legislation”

131: Clause 142, page 79, line 3, leave out subsection (9)

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c243
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

133: Clause 148, page 82, line 40, after “failures” insert “to comply with the data protection legislation”

134: Clause 148, page 82, line 41, leave out paragraph (b) and insert—

“(b) provide for the maximum penalty that may be imposed in relation to such failures to be either...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c243
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

138: Clause 152, page 84, line 40, leave out subsection (3)

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c248
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

139: Clause 153, page 85, line 27, leave out “prepared” and insert “produced”

140: Clause 153, page 85, line 42, leave out “the guidance” and insert “guidance produced under this section”

141: Clause 153, page 85, line 44, leave out “publishing” and insert “producing”

142: Clause 153, page 86,...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c248
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

144: After Clause 153, insert the following new Clause—

“Approval of first guidance about regulatory action

(1) When the first guidance is produced under section 153(1)—

(a) the Commissioner must submit the final version to the Secretary of State, and

(b) the Secretary of State must lay the guidance before...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c248
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

145: Clause 159, page 89, line 15, leave out from “compensation” to end of line 16 and insert “for material or non-material damage), “non-material damage” includes distress”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c249
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

146: Clause 160, page 90, line 3, leave out from “loss” to end of line 4 and insert “and damage not involving financial loss, such as distress”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wanted to ask—

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c250
House
House of Lords

We have had the debate already. We should now move to the vote.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c250
House
House of Lords

I am just asking a question, although I thank the noble Lord for his advice. There is a consequent question, subject to the vote we have just

had, that I think changes the situation. I just wanted to have my noble friend Lord Attlee’s view—

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c250
House
House of Lords

What would my noble friend’s reaction be if the inquiry that we have just voted for determined that the proposal that he has just made is a foolish one?

Member
Lord Finkelstein (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c251
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

149: Clause 161, page 90, line 18, after “court” insert “or tribunal”

150: Clause 161, page 90, line 28, at end insert “, or

( ) the person acted—

(i) for the special purposes,

(ii) with a view to the publication by a person of any journalistic, academic, artistic or...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c251
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

151A: Clause 162, page 91, line 5, at end insert “and section (Re-identification: effectiveness testing conditions)”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c278
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I turn to the new offence of reidentifying de-identified personal data. As a new clause, with no corresponding parallel in the 1998 Act, it has been a hot topic throughout the passage of the Bill and the Government welcome the insightful debates on it that took place in...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc278-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister. We on these Benches had considerable activity from the academic community, security researchers and so on. I am delighted that the Minister has reflected those concerns with the new amendments.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c279
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo the noble Lord’s words. We also welcome these amendments. As has been said, this issue was raised by the academic community, whose primary concern was that the way the Bill had originally been phrased would make important security research illegal and weaken data protection for everyone...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc279-280
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his support on this. I accept that there may be things to look at that the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, has mentioned. It is better to consider those things properly rather than give an answer off the top of my head at...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c280
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

152: Clause 162, page 91, line 16, after “court” insert “or tribunal”

153: Clause 162, page 91, line 20, leave out “the person acted in the reasonable belief that”

154: Clause 162, page 91, line 21, at beginning insert “the person acted in the reasonable belief that”

155: Clause...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc280-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

161A: After Clause 162, insert the following new Clause—

“Re-identification: effectiveness testing conditions

(1) For the purposes of section 162, in relation to a person who re-identifies information that is de-identified personal data, “the effectiveness testing conditions” means the conditions in subsections (2) and (3).

(2) The first condition...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c281
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

162: Clause 164, page 93, line 17, leave out paragraph (c)

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c281
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

163: Clause 165, page 93, line 37, after second “as” insert “reasonably”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c281
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

164: Clause 166, page 94, line 34, leave out “literary or artistic” and insert “artistic or literary”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c282
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

166: Clause 169, page 95, line 36, leave out from beginning to second “regulations” in line 37 and insert—

“(2) Before making regulations under this Act, the Secretary of State must consult—

(a) the Commissioner, and

(b) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.

(2A) Subsection (2)...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c282
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

171: Clause 170, page 96, line 29, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert—

“(a) to amend or replace the definition of “the Data Protection Convention” in section 2;

(b) to amend Chapter 3 of Part 2 of this Act;

(c) to amend Part 4 of this Act;

(d)...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc282-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

173: Clause 171, page 97, line 8, after “court” insert “or tribunal”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c283
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

175: Clause 173, page 98, line 26, at end insert—

“(2A) A body or other organisation which meets the conditions in subsections (3) and (4) may also exercise some or all of the rights under subsection (2) independently of the data subject’s authority.

(2B) Subsection (2A)—

(a) applies in respect of...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c283
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a result of the vagaries of grouping, redrafting and so on, I am in danger of being the tail that wags the dog on this group of amendments, especially as Amendment 175 deals with the processing of personal data to which the GDPR does not apply. Amendment...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc283-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his introduction and for paving the way to the comments I want to make. He suggested further reading but I might be able to shorten the reading list for the Minister, because I am going to cite a...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc284-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too want to speak to this amendment, to which I have added my name, and I acknowledge and welcome the support of the Information Commissioner on this issue. I support the collective redress of adults but I specifically want to support the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, on...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc285-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to noble Lords for their comments. Although I have to say at the outset that we have some reservations about these amendments, I think we might be able to find a way forward this evening. I have listened to the noble Lords, Lord Stevenson...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc286-7
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, can I get absolute reassurance from him that this is not pushing it into the future, where it will languish? Will the Government be looking to this review to actually solve the problem that we have put forward on behalf of children?

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c287
House
House of Lords

It absolutely will not and cannot languish, because we are going to put in the Bill—so on a statutory basis—that this has to be reviewed in two years. It will not languish. As I said, if we were just going to kick it into the long grass, I would not...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c287
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and am only sorry that I, rather than the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, have the privilege of responding. The Minister came back, I thought, very helpfully. The noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, made a

superb case for these rights to be implemented...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c287
House
House of Lords

To be clear, two years after Royal Assent.

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c288
House
House of Lords

Let us hope that that is treated as an important timetable. I was interested that the Minister expressed his sympathy—I know that that was genuine—but then went on to talk about risks and pitfalls, and very significant developments, which all sounded a bit timid. I understand that we are in...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c288
House
House of Lords

I think it applies to the whole thing, but if I am wrong, I will certainly write to everyone who is here.

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c288
House
House of Lords

In that case, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c288
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara

176: Clause 175, leave out Clause 175 and insert the following new Clause—

“Framework for Data Processing by Government

(1) The Commissioner must prepare a document, called the Framework for Data Processing by Government, which contains guidance about the processing of personal data in connection with the exercise...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc288-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government introduced quite late in the proceedings in Committee a group of amendments that set up a parallel system under which data processing undertaken by government departments could be considered to be governed. Our Amendment 176 attempts to ask some questions, and in that sense it is...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc289-290
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have only two brief observations to make, one supportive and one otherwise. My supportive observation is that I am very much in favour of the use of the affirmative resolution procedure for the approval of regulations, rather than the negative one. I add in parenthesis that I...

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc290-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hear what the noble Viscount said about the amendment, but the problem is that even the affirmative resolution procedure is not necessarily a good way to test the framework. The noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, was unusually kind about the Government’s framework. As he said, the Secretary of...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c291
House
House of Lords

But I think that the noble Earl would accept that the last time a negative instrument was prayed against successfully was something

like 1940—certainly a long time ago—and it was about the use of petroleum with open flames.

9.30 pm

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc291-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all those who have participated. I take on board what the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, said about our brief debate on the final day in Committee, so we can do a bit tonight. I hope that by the end I will be able to...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc292-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister said that the Information Commissioner was consulted, but what was her view? Can the Minister put on record what the Information Commissioner’s view about the final architecture was? She has made it fairly clear to us that this is not satisfactory, as far as she is...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c293
House
House of Lords

When I said that she was consulted, I said what I meant. This is one of the few areas in the whole Bill, I think, where we do not have complete agreement with the Information Commissioner. I think that she is worried about complications regarding independence and the extent of...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c293
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to keep interrupting the Minister, but is he therefore saying that the frameworks cover government and that the ICO’s codes of practice cover government as well?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c293
House
House of Lords

Absolutely. The framework exists like other sectoral guidance that is produced, under the overarching guidance produced by the Information Commissioner. In a minute I will provide further reassurance on how the two interlink.

As I have already set out, the Government will consult the commissioner in preparing the framework. Importantly, she...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc293-4
House
House of Lords

I know that we should not be intervening like this on Report, but the phrasing that the Minister just used is of interest—to the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, as well, I think. What does “irrelevant” mean? Can the Minister unpick that a little? Either the Secretary of State has the...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c294
House
House of Lords

I think it means that, if the Information Commissioner were considering the case of a data breach committed by the Government, she would normally take the framework into account, as she would take into account the guidance that other sectors produce. If, however, there were circumstances in which she did...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc294-5
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister very much indeed for his very full response. I will read it carefully in Hansard but at this stage, although it is a rather complicated issue, I understand where he is coming from and I think we can probably let it rest at this point. If...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c295
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara

181: After Clause 178, insert the following new Clause—

“Personal data ethics advisory board and ethics code of practice

(1) The Secretary of State must appoint an independent Personal Data Ethics Advisory Board (“the board”) as soon as reasonably practicable after the passing of this Act.

(2) The board’s...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c296
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we can be quite brief on this matter. It is an open secret that both the Government and Her Majesty’s loyal Opposition,

joined by others who have signed Amendment 181, were keen to try to move ahead with the idea of setting up a data ethics board or...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c296
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are at the last knockings on most of the Bill. It is rather ironic that one of the most important concepts that we need to establish is a new data ethics body—a new stewardship body—called for by the Government in their manifesto, by the Royal Society, by...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c297
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can certainly confirm that the new Secretary of State is dynamic. In this group we are in danger of violently agreeing with each other. There is a definite consensus on the need for this; whether there will be consensus on the results is another matter. I agree...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc297-8
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister for that response. That is probably the right way forward, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c298
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

182: Clause 184, page 103, line 24, leave out from “of” to end of line 29 and insert “—

(a) its functions under the data protection legislation, or

(b) its other functions relating to the Commissioner’s acts and omissions.

(2) But this section does not authorise the making of...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc298-9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

184: Clause 189, page 108, line 20, at end insert—

“the made affirmative resolution procedure
section 169”
Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c299
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

184A: Clause 192, page 111, line 3, after “of” insert “the GDPR and”

184B: Clause 192, page 111, line 4, at end insert “(to the extent that is not already the case).

( ) Where government departments are not able to enter into contracts with each other, a...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c299
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

187: Schedule 18, page 200, line 23, leave out “sections 76C or” and insert “section”

188: Schedule 18, page 200, line 24, leave out “offences of disclosing information and” and insert “offence of”

189: Schedule 18, page 201, line 1, leave out “sections 76C or” and insert “section”

190:...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc299-300
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage third day (part one of two). New clause (Duty to support small organisations) discussed and withdrawn. New clause (Code on personal data of national significance) agreed. New clause (Age appropriate design code) agreed. New clause (Records of national security certificates) agreed. New clause (Inquiry into issues arising...

Lead member
Lord Ashton of Hyde; Baroness Williams of Trafford; Lord Keen of Elie
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc192-251
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage third day (part two of two). New clause (Re-identification: effectiveness testing conditions) agreed. New clause (Framework for Data Processing by Government) discussed and withdrawn. New clause (Personal data ethics advisory board and ethics code of practice) discussed and withdrawn. Amendments 151A, 152 to 161, 161A, 162 to...

Lead member
Lord Ashton of Hyde
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc278-300
House
House of Lords

No, no.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c231
House
House of Lords

No!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c250
House
House of Lords

No.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 c251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to add to what my noble friend Lord Marlesford said, in small villages, a small number of people do everything. That is increasingly true as many villages become, sadly, of one class and one age group. The person who is helping to run the parish council is also...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2018
Reference
788 cc198-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking noble Lords for their amendments, which bring us

back to the important issues around the use of automated processing in what is an increasingly digital world. I apologise if my smile was misleading, I was just very pleased to see the noble Baroness in...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2017
Reference
787 cc1579-1582
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the Framework for Data Processing by Government provisions in the Data Protection Bill on the Cabinet Office strategy to make better use of data.

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2017
Reference
HL3885
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 15/01/2018 from Lord Ashton of Hyde to Lord Stevenson of Balmacara regarding the re-identification offence in the Data Protection Bill, as raised during the debate at report stage day 3. 3p.

Deposited by
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
DEP2018-0028
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interests as set out in the register, in particular as a partner in the global commercial law firm DAC Beachcroft LLP and as chair of the British Insurance Brokers’ Association.

In debates on the Financial Guidance and Claims Bill, yesterday and on previous days, noble Lords...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc205-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a relatively narrow point and affects only a very small part of the Bill, but is still quite important. The amendments

in the group mainly cover the question of how the Bill can reach out to the question about anonymisation and how, or not, it plays...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc208-210
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at earlier stages of the Bill, the Minister and others have been at pains to stress the need to ensure that, whatever we finally do, the Bill should help to build trust between those who operate and accept data and those who

provide it—the data subjects. It is...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 cc221-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill creates a comprehensive and modern framework for data protection in the UK. The importance of these data protection standards continues to grow—a point that has not been lost on noble Lords, nor the Government. That is why the Government have tabled Amendments 185A, 185B, 185C and...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2017
Reference
787 c228
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 113A I will speak to Amendments 114A, 118A, 119A and 121A. Schedule 6 changes references to “the Union” to “the United Kingdom” and deals with the transposition between the GDPR and the applied GDPR as and when we move beyond Brexit.

The paragraphs to which these...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 c2043
House
House of Lords

I shall speak to Amendment 124Q and to a number of amendments in this group. I start with a general point. The number of amendments that we have tabled to Part 3 in particular, but also to Part 4, might suggest considerable opposition to the Bill, but I reassure the...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2054-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments is about data protection principles. Our Amendments 129G and 129H would add transparency to the requirements of lawfulness and fairness for processing. Here, the directive is again being reflected, but why, since transparency is a requirement in the case of the intelligence services? I...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2059-2060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we debated automated decision-making under Part 2 on Monday. Clause 48 provides for automated decision-making in the case of law enforcement. No doubt we will return to the issues

raised on Monday in this connection, but for now, Clause 48(1) provides that a “qualifying significant decision” must be,

“required...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2070-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 56 anticipates that competent law enforcement authorities may work together, and designates them as “joint controllers”. Clause 56(2) allows them to “determine their respective responsibilities”, although there is an exception when the responsibility is,

“determined under or by virtue of an enactment”.

Amendment 137A would, I suggest, take us...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 c2076
House
House of Lords

My Lords, under Clause 59, the controller must record certain information, including, according to subsection (2)(g),

“where applicable, details of the use of profiling”.

The purpose of Amendment 137B is to ask whether, if profiling is used, this is not applicable. My amendment would delete the words, but the Minister will understand...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2077-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, sensitive processing requires meeting at least one condition from the menu in Schedule 9 and one in Schedule 10. This could be achieved, for instance, because the processing is necessary to protect someone’s vital interests under Schedule 9, and for the same reason under Schedule 10 when consent...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2017
Reference
785 cc2083-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 5, I will also speak to Amendment 6 which are both in my name. I will respond later to Amendment 115, which is in the same group but was tabled by other noble Lords. Amendments 5 and 6 are probing amendments to try to tease...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 cc1203-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendments 13, 15 and 21. It is slightly putting the cart before the horse to deal with Amendment 11. I will do so since it comes earlier in the order, but it covers a rather less general issue than the less general amendments.

Under...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 cc1230-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, right from the outset, I had better declare that this is a probing amendment. I shudder to think of another chastisement from the noble Lord, Lord Ashton —that would be too terrible to contemplate. Chastisement from the noble Baroness? Even better.

The amendment is about whether we should put...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 October 2017
Reference
785 c1186
House
House of Lords

I. Letter dated 19/10/2017 from Lord Ashton of Hyde and Baroness Williams of Trafford to Peers regarding issues raised during the Second Reading of the Data Protection Bill. 6p. II. Annex: Data Protection Bill - comparison of schedules 1 to 3 with the Data Protection Act 1988. 7p.

Deposited by
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 October 2017
Reference
DEP2017-0603
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House has considered Exiting the European Union and Data Protection.

The digital revolution through which we are living is bringing about the fastest pace of change that any generation has ever seen. With advances in technology accelerating, it is likely that this current pace of change...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c498
House
House of Commons

I very much agree with the points that the Minister is making and the ambition he is setting out. Will he commit to securing an adequacy agreement from the EU so that the free flow of personal data, which he rightly says is important, can continue?

Member
Stephen Timms (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c498
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the right hon. Gentleman’s extensive understanding of these issues, not only from his time as a Minister but since. His understanding is so good that he has correctly anticipated the next page of my speech. That is exactly what we are seeking, because it is strongly...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 cc498-9
House
House of Commons

The Minister said “something akin” to an adequacy deal. Will he explain what that might mean?

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c499
House
House of Commons

Yes, of course. Our future relationship with the EU will be bespoke. We want to make sure that the flow of data is unhindered, so we effectively seek an adequacy deal, but that is currently scheduled to be negotiated as part of the future relationship. Whether it is enacted through...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c500
House
House of Commons

No one would dispute the worthiness of the Minister’s intentions, but the UK will none the less cease to be a member of the EU’s safe data zone following Brexit, which will make it more difficult for banks and other businesses to transfer data between the two jurisdictions. Will the...

Member
Wes Streeting (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c500
House
House of Commons

That is our objective in terms of the goal, but I have one difference with the premise of the hon. Gentleman’s question. He said that our leaving the EU will make things more difficult, but that is not necessarily so, because we seek a relationship that, in terms of the...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c500
House
House of Commons

The UK has more than 10% of data flows, more than three quarters of which are with the EU, and more than 40% of the data centres in Europe are in the UK, so does the Minister agree that it is in the interests of European businesses to secure data...

Member
Vicky Ford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c500
House
House of Commons

I agree wholeheartedly and strongly with my hon. Friend, who is an expert in these matters, having just arrived in the House from the European Parliament, where she was a rapporteur on some of the key committees that made a number of the important decisions in this policy area. She...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2017
Reference
629 c500
House
House of Commons