Skip to main content

61-80 of 76,942 results for subject:Devolution

Type

-
Early day motions (157)
+ Legislation (253) + Acts (29)
-
Public acts (29)
+ Bills (83) + Public bills (83)
-
Government bills (36)
+ Private members' bills (47)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (20)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (12)
-
Ten minute rule bills (12)
+ Delegated legislation (141)
-
Statutory instruments (141)
+ Members' contributions (69,325)
-
Business questions (407)
-
Maiden speeches (101)
-
Oral answers to questions (3,169)
-
Oral question time interventions (73)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (147)
-
Points of order (22)
-
Proceeding contributions (62,680)
-
Speaker's rulings (2)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,425) + Committee proceedings (846)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (338)
-
Select Committee reports (247)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (106)
-
Select Committee written evidence (278)
+ Parliamentary papers (1,433)
-
Annual reports (26)
-
Command papers (127)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (8)
-
Deposited papers (513)
-
House of Commons papers (613)
-
House of Lords papers (115)
-
Impact assessments (28)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (39)
-
White papers (10)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (2,426) + Debates (1,659)
-
Adjournment debates (68)
-
Backbench debates (22)
+ Committee proceedings (846)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (338)
-
Debates on select committee reports (28)
-
Debates on treaties (3)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (4)
-
Emergency debates (4)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (975)
-
Debates on bills (728)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (246)
+ Monarch's speech debates (30)
-
King's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (27)
-
Opposition days (20)
-
Questions for short debate (20)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (3)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (5)
+ Statements (709) + Oral statements (185)
-
Business statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (169)
-
Select Committee statements (6)
-
Written statements (524)
-
Urgent questions (13)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,065)
-
Business questions (407)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (147)
-
Private notice questions (5)
-
Urgent questions (13)
-
Written questions (3,258)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (240) + Commons Briefing papers (159)
-
Briefing papers on bills (18)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (37)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (35)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (18)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (13)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)
-
POSTnotes (8)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What I would say to the noble Lord about all these things is that we are setting this organisation up and, conventionally, it is the chair and the board that support, hire and fire the chief executive. I do not believe that his amendment is the right way of doing...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc336-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill should be amended to say that the business plan is annual, especially as that is the Government’s clear intention. The Minister has just said the business plan is going to be annual and it was precisely to get stakeholder engagement with business away from the annual...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c337GC
House
House of Lords

I think I understand what the noble Lord is saying. I am expecting an organisation, as GBR will be, to be constantly in discussion with the wider railway industry and the supply industry, and indeed its customers, simply because, as we have discussed, the market will change over time. I...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c338GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister has just changed the story. A moment ago, he was saying that engagement with business stakeholders would be through the business plan. Now he is saying that it is not actually through the business plan once a year—because anyway, we do not know it is going to be...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c338GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with the noble Lord that the supply chain is crucial. Actually, for much of the supply chain, what really makes a difference is the five-year periodic settlement. That highlights the need for this engagement to go on, both at the time when the five-year plan is formed and...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc338-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who took part in this interesting debate. To my mind, we established one or two rather important propositions.

The first is that, when the Government are setting out their statement of objectives, in relation to which GBR writes its business plan, it would be...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc339-340GC
House
House of Lords

If I may intervene on the noble Lord, for once, I say to him: welcome to the five-year funding periods. We are now in control period 7, I think. The process that was described is complex, but it works remarkably well, which is why the industry and the Government are...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c340GC
House
House of Lords

I take that point, but, of course, that is if the financial assistance under this is restricted to infrastructure, which we debated a short while ago. If there is a requirement to notify of the financial assistance, I do not see it at the moment. The Minister might have a...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c340GC
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 5 to 11 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to. Clause 12 agreed to. Schedule 2 under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
Answering member
Lord Moylan
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc277-340GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Pidgeon

22A: Clause 5, page 4, line 5, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c277GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, had hoped to be here today but found himself with other commitments, and therefore asked me to move his Amendment 22A, which I also support. This is a probing amendment on whether the provision in the Bill which enables Great British Railways to...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc277-8GC
House
House of Lords

I think it might fall to me to speak next, if my noble friend does not want to speak to his amendments at this stage.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c278GC
House
House of Lords

I will speak at the end, if I may.

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c278GC
House
House of Lords

I have four amendments in this group: Amendments 26, 64, 304 and 333. They are all on the same point, which is that, in the Bill, the definition of a “relevant local government body” is expressed as mayoral combined authorities, mayoral combined county authorities and passenger transport executives. Those first...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c279GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to support what my noble friend Lord Lansley has said on his Amendment 26. I had some dealings on this when the Prime Minister was the Mayor of the Greater Manchester and when Andy Street was Mayor of the West Midlands. Both of them engaged...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc279-280GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to speak to the amendments in my name, Amendments 298, 299 and 300, which follow on from the amendments about which noble Lords have spoken. I want to double-check that there will be consultation with the relevant authorities—whether it is Scotland, Wales or other authorities—before...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc280-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I turn to the substance of this group, I would like to say that I received this morning from the Minister, as I imagine other noble Lords have, a letter setting out certain corrections to statements that he made on Tuesday. I have not had the opportunity...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc281-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we move on, I return briefly to a point raised in Committee on Tuesday on Amendment 146, regarding the long-term rail strategy and its relationship with devolved railway responsibilities. I was less than clear on this issue when we discussed it previously and thought it would be...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

I have a quick question. Why, then, is there not a similar provision saying that the rail strategy may not make provision about the functions of Welsh Ministers?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

The answer is that the infrastructure arrangements in Wales are significantly different and Wales does not have its own settlement in that respect. I reassure noble Lords that engagement between the Government and Scottish and Welsh Ministers on both strategies is productive and will continue until their publication. I am...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords