Skip to main content

151-200 of 4,193 results for subject:Dissolution

Type

+ Legislation (12) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (4,044)
-
Business questions (34)
-
Maiden speeches (28)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,998)
-
Speaker's rulings (4)
+ Parliamentary committees (25) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (17)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (55) + Debates (36)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (12)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (73)
-
Business questions (34)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (18)
+ Research briefings (29) + Commons Briefing papers (18)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords In Focus (2)
-
Lords In Focus - House of Lords (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I will speak to my Amendment 5, to exclude Clause 3 entirely from the Bill, which has been grouped with the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Norton. I do not need to take much of your Lordships’ time. We have just passed an amendment...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1609-1610
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I supported these amendments in Committee and I should like to do so again today. I cannot help feeling that there is just a hint—as the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, put it earlier—of the generals fighting the last war, because it is very obvious why Clause 3 is...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1610-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a new threat. We have heard of the threat of an election being called to the detriment of Back-Bench Members whose support is being sought, but the threat of Miller 3 is not one that has been produced before. I found it an unpersuasive line of...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1612-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Butler, is right to pursue his amendment because it seems quite possible that the House of Commons will decline the invitation to accept the amendment that your Lordships’ House so recently voted in favour of. I will address a number of questions briefly, because...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1614-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suppose I should declare a professional interest in the possibility of Miller 3.

I support the amendments in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Norton and Lord Butler. I do not suggest that the courts would today never entertain a judicial review in relation to Dissolution. The...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1615-6
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord in the middle of his flow, but I think his point was that the law has moved on greatly since Lord Roskill. So does not citing a decision from 1992 rather defeat his own argument?

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1616
House
House of Lords

No, because my point is that hopeless or frivolous applications will be dealt with speedily by the courts. This was plainly an application with no merit whatever, and my noble friend’s point, as I understood him, was that the mere existence of the jurisdiction could cause delay. I am giving...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1616
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too attempted to darn this Bill in Committee and, indeed, spoke at Second Reading, and I too am opposed to this group of amendments. My core concern here is to safeguard my successors on the Bench and to avoid the risk of constitutional crisis, which would arise...

Member
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1616-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell, was kind enough to quote me from when I spoke in Committee on this. I want to underline that what I said was:

“I cannot conceive of any circumstances in which the involvement of the courts could ever be justified”.—[Official Report, 25/1/22;...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1617-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a layman and an unashamed politician, I want to make a couple of layman’s/politician’s observations in what has been a largely legal argument.

Much of this discussion—in fact, the whole of this Report stage—has been considered with the ghost of the 2017-19 Parliament at its back; the cloud...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1618-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must also apologise for not being here in Committee, although I have followed your Lordships’ arguments with great interest.

One point is abundantly clear to me: the idea of not using the royal prerogative to call for an election is, at its very best, curious. The concept that...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1619
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, asks whether the sun has risen. Yes, it is still up there, but for those who lived in the Mexican desert during the testing of the atomic bomb, the sky was so full of light that nearby farmers woke up and started working,...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1619-1620
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, I would like to respectfully adopt the arguments of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Brown, and others, including the noble Lord, Lord Trevethin and Oaksey, and my noble friend Lord Faulks, in this matter.

The noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, said, I think, that he...

Member
Lord Fairfax of Cameron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1620
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord allow for the possibility that the reason why there was no precedent prior to Miller 2 was because no Prime Minister prior to that had abused, in the view of the court, the power to prorogue Parliament in order to frustrate his views in relation to...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1620
House
House of Lords

The use of the word “abuse” is somewhat tendentious. As I was saying on the question of the rule of law, and as held by the divisional court, until the Supreme Court decision on Miller, Prorogation was thought to be an entirely

political matter and therefore not subject to the...

Member
Lord Fairfax of Cameron (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1620-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords again for an interesting debate and their many contributions. Like others who have never been called to the high profession of the law, I bow to the expertise of so many of your Lordships in this matter. However, as a lay man, I notice...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1621-3
House
House of Lords

I understand everything that the noble Lord has said, but is there not a contradiction there? One wants to say that the matter should not be taken to court but, in that case, where is the confidence that something could not go badly wrong with the process? Scenarios ought to...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1622
House
House of Lords

Once the general election genie is out of the bottle, it should stay out of the bottle. The decision lies with the electorate. There is no question of a dodgy scenario. It is then down to the electorate. The ultimate political reprimand is available to them, as my party discovered...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1622-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all those who have spoken. This has been a very valuable debate which indeed shows the value of the House of Lords. I am especially grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, as well as the noble Lords, Lord Beith...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1624-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Butler of Brockwell

5: Clause 3, leave out Clause 3

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1625
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too am very grateful to those who have taken part in this debate.

This for me is a matter of principle. It is wrong, as the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, the noble and right reverend Lord and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, said, that there can...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1625-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Wallace of Saltaire

6: Clause 6, page 2, line 13, leave out subsection (3) and insert—

“(3) This Act comes into force when a Cabinet Manual revised in relation to the dissolution and calling of Parliament has been laid before Parliament.

(3A) Prior to revising the Cabinet Manual the Minister must...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1626
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I tabled this amendment last week and received a letter on Monday evening from the Minister that answers a

number of my points. Therefore, I mainly wish to stress the usefulness of the Cabinet Manual and to encourage the Minister to repeat what he said in my letter...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1626-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, for his thoughts on the Cabinet Manual. It is important. I am pleased to say that, of course, the Government agree on the fundamental importance of the Cabinet Manual, and I can confirm to the House, as I have indicated privately...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1629-1630
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for repeating that statement. I stress that the revision of the manual should ideally come well before the timing of the next election, and I strongly support the opposition suggestion that there should be a debate, ideally in both Houses, on the conventions that will have...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 c1630
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendment 1 agreed to on division (200 to 160). Amendment 5 disagreed to on division (120 to 230). Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 112).

Lead member
Lord True
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
9 February 2022
Reference
818 cc1584-1630
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 07/02/2022 from Lord True to Baroness Smith of Basildon regarding an issue raised during the Committee Stage of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill: the meaning of purported and why references to this term are needed in clause 3 of the Bill. 2p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
7 February 2022
Reference
DEP2022-0125
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak only briefly. This short debate shows how, although we have five groups of amendments, they are all quite interdependent: they are all involved with the same issue. The noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, has done us a service tonight. He has indicated what...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c186
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a long and really interesting discussion, and it sums up the very reason for this amendment. When I spoke on the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Norton, at the beginning, I said that one of the reasons I thought he had brought his amendment...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc207-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this debate I find myself in the unusual position of agreeing with almost every speaker—agreeing with something they said and disagreeing with something they said.

I start with the point made by my noble friend Lord Stansgate. If the Bill is merely returning to the status quo ante,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc230-1
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, and I am grateful for the detail that he is going into. I am not a lawyer, but I am not the only person in your Lordships’ House tonight who is not. Can the Minister say, in lay man’s language, what he understands...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suspect that those words are sufficient for lawyers, but I think the Minister’s understanding of this might be as great as mine at the moment, so I will perhaps take advice between now and Report so that I fully understand the implications of what he saying—because I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly, if only to remind your Lordships’ House that the Labour Chief Whip, the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, and I were not able to vote in 1974, but that is probably not a good reason for rising to the Dispatch Box at this time of night.

I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c246
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we have had a slightly longer and more interesting discussion on this than we anticipated at the start. The noble Lord, Lord Wallace, made a very valid point, not least because we have spoken a lot tonight about the normal conventions and practices of parliamentary...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much support Clause 1 being part of the Bill, but I want briefly to record how big a decision this is. Just 11 years after the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 was put on to the statute book, with much criticism and objection to it at the...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Evelyn Waugh once said that the problem with the Tory party is that it

“never put the clock back by a single second.”

Is it not rather wonderful that it is now putting the clock back by 11 whole years?

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Norton of Louth

1: Clause 2, page 1, line 6, after “Her Majesty’s” insert “personal”

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government have a manifesto commitment to get rid of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. The Opposition also have a manifesto commitment to repeal it. This Bill repeals the Act and seeks, as we have just heard, to restore the status quo ante. Like my later amendments, Amendment 1...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc181-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the House is indebted to the noble Lord for elucidating this issue and tabling the amendment. In the Joint Committee, it was worrying that the Government did not initially seem to understand the distinction between requesting a Dissolution and advising a Dissolution, advice that would be binding on...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc182-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with much of what the noble Lord, Lord Beith, said and with the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Norton. I am not sure it is hugely important but, because the issue of “advice” as opposed to “request” has reared its head as early as...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc183-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are very much indebted to the noble Lord for his background in this matter. It is important to remember that there are Dissolution principles to be settled before this situation arises. From time to time they have been revised, but I do not think they have been...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c184
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I may intervene in this debate, I think it is still important that what used to be the custom and convention be clarified on paper. This is for a very simple reason. While I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, that it is inconceivable

that a...

Member
Lord Desai (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c184
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with all those who have said that my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth has done us a very considerable service. He reminded us of the formidable words of Alan Lascelles, private secretary to George VI in 1950. We should, at all times, keep those Lascelles...

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

May I just ask, what would be an improper dissolution?

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

I do not think I could make a list of the possibilities. One can conceive of them, but we trust to the existence of this power and the wisdom of the monarch to ensure that no improper dissolution is likely ever to be brought forward.

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene briefly because this is a very interesting debate and I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, for having tabled his amendment. We are all here because we recognise that the 2011 Act was a mistake. However, I am a little puzzled by...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the answer to the question of the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, may be that, if something was clearly in contradiction

to the dissolution principles, it would be wrong. The idea must be that the Prime Minister would exercise his power to request within the framework provided by the...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all those who contributed to what has been an important and interesting debate. I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth for bringing it forward, and I also welcomed the opportunity to talk to him about it. What I am going to say...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc186-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to everyone who has spoken. It has given rise to a very valuable debate with some very helpful interventions. I take the point of my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay of Clashfern that there is an extensive academic argument about whether the prerogative...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc187-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Wallace of Saltaire

2: Clause 2, page 1, line 9, at end insert “subject to subsection (1A).

(1A) The Prime Minister may not request Her Majesty to exercise Her prerogative to dissolve Parliament if Parliament has been prorogued, unless Parliament is first recalled and the House of Commons agrees that...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c188
House
House of Lords