Skip to main content

151-200 of 2,446 results for subject:Monarchy

Type

-
Early day motions (63)
+ Legislation (22) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (19) + Public bills (19)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (16)
-
Ballot bills (2)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (6)
-
Ten minute rule bills (5)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (2,032)
-
Business questions (20)
-
Maiden speeches (6)
-
Oral answers to questions (102)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,817)
+ Parliamentary committees (26) + Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (40)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (18)
-
House of Commons papers (15)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (65) + Debates (37)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
+ Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (29)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (4)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (18) + Oral statements (7)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Written statements (11)
+ Parliamentary questions (311)
-
Business questions (20)
+ Oral questions (110)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (7)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Written questions (179)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (46) + Commons Briefing papers (41)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (5)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, let me carry on on the groupings that we have and on the speech in introducing his amendment of my noble friend—

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

We are on the second amendment of the day and this is the sixth speech from the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde. I think we can all draw our own conclusions.

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fancy that, if this Bill dealt with the expulsion of all Peers over 80, the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, would be a leading light in opposition to that legislation. I am simply carrying out my duty as a Member of this House to hold the Government to...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c43
House
House of Lords

I can respond in one sentence. The reason that I caved in on that amendment, on that particular day, is that we had already been rambling on for about an hour and a half on the subject and anything to shorten it was to my advantage. That principle could perhaps...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

My noble friend Lord Caithness is right to point out that the effect of this Bill is to make your Lordships’ House a second Chamber almost entirely nominated by the Prime Minister. I say “almost” because his amendment refers only to the Lords temporal; as noble Lords know, the Lords...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

In view of what my noble friend, Lord Strathclyde, and, indeed, the Minister have said, is there not a case for putting HOLAC on a statutory basis, as relating both to its existence and to its manner of appointment?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c44
House
House of Lords

My noble friend asks a very good question, but that is a question for a different group. The question of the House of Lords Appointments Commission is, rightly, worthy of a debate in a group of its own. If the noble Baroness wants to respond to my noble friend’s question...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc44-6
House
House of Lords

For clarification, the Government pray in aid their manifesto and talk about the grammar of where the full stop falls, but it is worth looking at their latest manifesto. In the same paragraph, where they talks about immediate modernisation and legislation to remove the right of hereditary Peers, they go...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c45
House
House of Lords

It is indeed. Whether the grammar matters or not, these are clearly linked, and as for those colleagues we are going to lose through this Bill, who were kept here as surety, as a reminder, to make sure that the deal was followed through, surely we owe it to them...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc45-7
House
House of Lords

It would be useful to know how this actually relates to the wording of the amendment.

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

I think very directly, because this is an amendment to remind your Lordships’ House and future Governments that the Bill gives Prime Ministers greater power than ever before to nominate people to this House, and the present Prime Minister, whom this will empower and embolden, has sent us, since he...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

The speaker’s own background is exactly the one that he is now criticising others for. He also has forgotten the people that Boris Johnson put in. So could we just have a little humility?

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

I draw the noble Baroness’s attention to my own amendment, which I hope has been brought forward in a spirit of humility, suggesting that there be a cap on the number of special advisers that Prime Ministers can nominate.

The reason I have tabled that amendment, and the one which...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we started the debate today with a conciliatory and constructive tone from the Front Benches, which I found optimistic and encouraging. I fear that things have gone pretty steeply downhill since that time, and they have also gone way off track from the amendments under discussion. I have...

Member
Lord Cromwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c48
House
House of Lords

I respectfully disagree with the noble Lord. I think this is about more than numbers; it is about a constitutional principle. It is right, as my noble friend Lord Caithness has done, to point out the powers that the Bill will give to the Prime Minister in the interim, and...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c48
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Earl for proposing his amendment. I will come back to the comments made in the debate, but basically the noble Earl seeks to put an overview of the Bill in the Bill. I make the same comment that I made to the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc48-50
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness the Leader of the House accept the arguments from the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, that if his Bill had

been passed we would now be left with 25 hereditaries? That would be a decent number and you would not need to get rid of them. Can...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c50
House
House of Lords

I do not always admire the noble Lord’s ingenuity, but I do on this occasion. I think the point the noble Lord was making was that had that been accepted at the time, we would not have any hereditary Peers, in effect, because all would be here as life Peers....

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c51
House
House of Lords

Is that “longer term” during this Parliament?

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c51
House
House of Lords

I do not know. It has to be when the policy is determined but I would certainly have thought that the second part of it, around participation and retirement, is something that we can look at quickly. If the House came to an agreement, it could be done quickly as...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc51-2
House
House of Lords

That is not fair to the Leader.

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is resisting that temptation but I say to him, as I say to all noble Lords, that I have always been open to discussions. But I need assurances, so when we see degroupings, filibustering and threats on different things, that does not give the confidence that allows...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness the Leader of the House for her reply. We have some useful additional information from her. However, I would take issue with her, just as she took issue with anybody who tried to misrepresent her in the debate. I did not...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

I do not accept that at all. There is no change whatever in the powers of the Prime Minister at that point. I have explained the process. I think the noble Earl is saying that it is not everybody in the House. Currently 88 Members are here because of their...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

As a result of this Bill, there will be a greater percentage of the House appointed by the Prime Minister than now.

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c52
House
House of Lords

Can I just finish? My point was that this could be abused. If I recall rightly the noble Baroness said, and I agree with her, that most Prime Ministers have behaved very responsibly, but on some occasions it has not been quite as we would have hoped. I am grateful...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc52-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

The Earl of Devon

3: Clause 1, page 1, line 1, at end insert—

“(A1) In section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 (exclusion of hereditary peers), at end insert “, except for a child or grandchild of the Sovereign”.”

Member's explanatory statement

This probing amendment invites the House to consider...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c53
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to speak to Amendment 3 in my name. It is a probing amendment aimed at focusing upon the hereditary principle in general, and its ongoing role within our constitution and this Parliament in the context of the sovereign in particular.

The Labour Party manifesto asserted...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc53-4
House
House of Lords

I too come from a long line of parents. My parents were the ones who were actually ploughing the lonely furrows that he referred to—probably on his ancestors’ lands. If he asks who will stand up for the monarch, I will, and my colleagues will. We all swore an oath...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c54
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his intervention. That is the point of this amendment, and I am very pleased to hear it. I look forward to the Front Benches from each of our parties repeating exactly the same point.

As I said, Sir Keir Starmer was bending his knee to...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c54
House
House of Lords

I do trust that the noble Earl is not suggesting that members of the Royal Family should participate in debates. That would be wholly disastrous.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c55
House
House of Lords

If the noble Viscount listens to my next paragraph, I will clarify that point.

I should also note, for the record, that we have a recent precedent for a grandchild of a sovereign seeking to join your Lordships’ House as an elected hereditary. In 2018, when I stood for a Cross-Bench...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c55
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak in support of the amendment from the noble Earl, Lord Devon. This Bill is about not just the future of hereditary Peers but the stability of our entire constitutional order. Hereditary Peers are not relics of feudal privilege, as the Government claim; they are a...

Member
Baroness Meyer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc55-6
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage first day. Clause 1 under consideration. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon; Lord Collins of Highbury; Lord Hermer
Answering member
Lord True; Baroness Finn; Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay; Lord Wolfson of Tredegar
Department
Attorney General; Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc12-81
House
House of Lords

An updated briefing paper on oaths of allegiance taken by senior office holders in the UK. This includes the Parliamentary Oath taken by MPs and peers and the judicial oath taken by judges.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
CBP-7515

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that public sector bodies use the King's cypher rather than Queen Elizabeth II’s cypher.

Asked by
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2024
Reference
14068
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to promote awareness of the (a) Commonwealth of Nations, (b) Monarchy and (c) Commonwealth realms in (i) schools in England.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Reform UK)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 November 2024
Reference
13120
House
House of Commons

I would be interested to see what amendments come forward, given my right hon. Friend’s remarks. There is a strong argument for having an expectation that if someone is appointed to the Lords, they do their job. That is the kind of amendment that even I, with my deep-rooted conservatism,...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c751
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right, and it is always good to have a mention of Bagehot in any constitutional debate. Bagehot draws the distinction between the dignified and the efficient parts of the

constitution, but I thought that my right hon. Friend was making an argument that the...

Member
Jesse Norman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c751
House
House of Commons

Dignity and efficiency are not necessarily incompatible—my right hon. Friend personifies their marriage. He is right to say that there is something ugly about the idea of a Government of either party simply stuffing the House of Lords with their friends or donors. Let us be honest: that is not...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c752
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Shaun Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c752
House
House of Commons

No, I am going to finish now.

A vapid fascination with now—imagine that. Of course, those philosophers on the Labour Benches will know that “now” is an illusion, as now becomes then in an instant, does it not? Yet the politics of now have an extraordinary appeal for faint hearts and...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

Oh, please not! [Laughter.]

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

I know there are students of Proust littered among the saplings on the Labour Benches. If they are truly to become oaks and leave their acorns in the soil, they need to read Proust more. Proust said that

“the most deplorable prejudices have had their moment of novelty when fashion lent...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c753
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Filton and Bradley Stoke (Claire Hazelgrove) for such a passionate maiden speech. She will be an excellent representative for her constituency. It is a privilege to stand here to give my own as the first...

Member
Anneliese Midgley (Labour)
Type
Maiden speeches
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 cc753-5
House
House of Commons

It is a great privilege to follow such a moving and strong maiden speech by the hon. Member for Knowsley (Anneliese Midgley). I could tell by how she spoke with such passion about Knowsley that she will always be a fierce advocate for her constituents, and make sure that their...

Member
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 cc755-6
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is making a fantastic point. He will know that it was in the Tudor era that reform of the House of Lords started, when the majority of bishops were removed, leaving these 26. The Paymaster General made a point about reforms not having been properly continued...

Member
Richard Holden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons

Indeed, and I want to encourage the Paymaster General. He has the potential to be known as a great reformer of the Labour party—he will write books about himself in the future—but he needs to be brave. He needs to be bold. I know that he can persuade his friends...

Member
Gavin Williamson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Gareth Snell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2024
Reference
754 c756
House
House of Commons