Skip to main content

61-80 of 16,161 results for subject:Technology

Type

-
Early day motions (32)
+ Legislation (65) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (11) + Public bills (11)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (10)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (8)
+ Delegated legislation (53)
-
Statutory instruments (53)
+ Members' contributions (10,535)
-
Business questions (26)
-
Maiden speeches (16)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,049)
-
Oral question time interventions (8)
+ Oral questions (1,119)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (87)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,355)
+ Parliamentary committees (641) + Committee proceedings (279)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
European Committee proceedings (6)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (210)
-
Select Committee reports (165)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (77)
-
Select Committee written evidence (139)
+ Parliamentary papers (1,350)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (135)
-
Consultation papers (54)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (8)
-
Deposited papers (580)
-
House of Commons papers (505)
-
House of Lords papers (71)
-
Impact assessments (12)
-
Treaties (45)
-
Unprinted command papers (7)
-
Unprinted papers (47)
-
White papers (8)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (733) + Debates (478)
-
Adjournment debates (53)
-
Backbench debates (6)
-
Budget debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (279)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
European Committee proceedings (6)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (210)
-
Debates on select committee reports (20)
-
e-petition debates (1)
-
Estimates days (3)
+ Legislative debates (128)
-
Debates on bills (92)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (36)
+ Monarch's speech debates (5)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (4)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (12)
-
Topical debates (1)
+ Formal proceedings (5)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (5)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (225) + Oral statements (48)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (177)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (6)
-
Ministerial corrections (6)
+ Parliamentary questions (4,558)
-
Business questions (26)
+ Oral questions (1,119)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (87)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (3,411)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (167) + Commons Briefing papers (43)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (21)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (9)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (6)
-
POSTbriefs (4)
-
POSTnotes (89)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Potholes are the bane of all our lives, including for my constituents, but I have a cunning plan: we could fix potholes much faster by tapping into the superpowers of bin men and women. Bin lorries travel every road every week. Why not equip them with cameras and AI-enabled technology, so that they can spot, map and log potholes immediately, as soon as they appear? That would significantly speed up the process of fixing them. This has been done very successfully in Australia. Will the Department for Transport work closely with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to ensure that local authorities have the funding and co-ordination needed to adopt this fantastic technology nationwide?

Asked by
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
789 c1048
House
House of Commons

That is exactly why the Government have funded the £30 million for Live Labs 2. We want councils to have access to the best available evidence on the condition of their roads. We have introduced a new road conditioning monitoring standard that enables local authorities to use a range of approved technologies, including innovative AI-based systems, to collect consistent and reliable data.

Answered by
Simon Lightwood (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
789 c1048
House
House of Commons

In my area, the improvement on potholes is noticeable, and I thank the Government for the additional funding, which is being used for large patching work; no longer is there just shovelling into endless holes. I am concerned, however, about road safety in my constituency. Understandably, the money has been prioritised for addressing the enormous backlog of roadworks that developed under the last Government. What more can we do to ensure safety, as well as good road conditions?

Asked by
Sarah Russell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
789 c1048
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will be aware that this Government brought forward, for the first time in over a decade, a road safety strategy. In addition, we have introduced a red, amber and green rating of local authorities, to identify where extra support is necessary in order to improve systems and practices, so that we can banish the potholes once and for all.

Answered by
Simon Lightwood (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
789 c1048
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether alignment of EU and UK clean technology standards are a subject of discussion of the EU-UK Reset negotiations.

Asked by
Mark Hendrick (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
16374
House
House of Commons

Digital Safety: Children

The following extract is from the urgent question on Digital Safety: Children on 8 June 2026.

I welcome the Minister’s announcement about blocking explicit images on children’s phones, but this should really have come much sooner. I totally agree with the hon. Member for Twickenham (Munira Wilson) that action...

Member
Kanishka Narayan (Labour)
Department
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 cc13-4WC
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department has taken since 1 January 2026 to support research infrastructure that facilitates the advancement of key technologies.

Asked by
Adam Jogee (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
16203
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what steps the Government is taking to encourage employers to offer structured returnship programmes for women seeking to re-enter science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers after a career break.

Asked by
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
18856
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to support the safe storage and disposal of oil and gas assets removed following a change in heating technology, in the context of the aim to deploy 450,000 clean heating systems annually by...

Asked by
Ben Goldsborough (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
17559
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 79 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 554 2026-27
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 81 2026-27
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to help small technology companies to work with the Department.

Asked by
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
15837
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what funding has been allocated within the Obesity Pathway Innovation Programme to assess the outcomes of that programme.

Asked by
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
15321
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has analysed international examples of requiring intervening Intelligent Speed Assistance technology for high-risk and repeat speeding offenders.

Asked by
Fleur Anderson (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
14972
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the capacity of West Midlands Police to enforce speed limits through (a) traffic officers and (b) technological measures.

Asked by
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
15271
House
House of Commons

The results from Cambridge and the DIOSynVax programme, primarily funded by the Government through Innovate UK, is a good example of how the Government are taking AI’s potential in vaccine technology seriously. AI’s most credible contribution to vaccine development is in the design stage, including predicting antigen structure and binding and predicting how pathogens evade immunity. Our £137 million AI for science strategy is funding some key enablers for AI use in drug discovery, including in medical research and engineering biology.

Answered by
Lord Vallance of Balham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c272
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for that Answer. If the House does not realise, what has happened in Cambridge is the first use of AI to design a vaccine candidate being used in human trials, with the possibility of being able to deal with a broad range of viruses. One of the researchers involved said that it is

“amazing what we can do with it for the good of humanity”.

Unfortunately, this new technology may also, in turn, potentially pose a great threat to humanity. So I ask my noble friend: what work is going on to ensure that this type of development is subject to the strictest controls and that, in future, no bad actors can in any way use this new technology to pose a threat to humanity?

Asked by
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c272
House
House of Lords

I completely agree that this technology is hugely important for the good it can do in making vaccines and new medicines. It will change our ability to treat and prevent diseases. It is also true that the same technology can be used for bad things. Like many technologies, it can be misused. Many things are in place already: it is illegal, of course, to make chemical and biological weapons, and the Government take very seriously the threat that can come from new technologies. The biological security strategy was published last year. There is £580 million in the defence investment plan for Porton Down infrastructure for a national biosecurity centre, and £115 million to strengthen defences against AI risk. This is a very active area of work.

Answered by
Lord Vallance of Balham (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c272
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the development of Evo 2—which is an AI biological model with 9.3 trillion nucleotides extending over 128,000 different species, including humans—means that there is now a capability to produce proteins, molecular structures and even genomes, and therefore artificial pathogens. So is it time for the UK to have mandatory enforcement and regulation of functional-base synthetic DNA?

Asked by
Lord Patel (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
858 c272
House
House of Lords