Skip to main content

201-250 of 4,193 results for subject:Dissolution

Type

+ Legislation (12) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (4,044)
-
Business questions (34)
-
Maiden speeches (28)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,998)
-
Speaker's rulings (4)
+ Parliamentary committees (25) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (17)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (55) + Debates (36)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (12)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (73)
-
Business questions (34)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (18)
+ Research briefings (29) + Commons Briefing papers (18)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords In Focus (2)
-
Lords In Focus - House of Lords (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, quite a lot of what we will discuss this evening is how far we need to put into statute the sort of things the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, has been thinking about, or whether a revised version of the Cabinet Manual would be sufficient to set...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc188-190
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment in my name and those of the noble Baroness, Lady Smith of Basildon, and the noble Lords, Lord Newby and Lord Lansley, is about the constitutional location of power today and for the next 80 to 100 years. It is not about where, historically speaking, power...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc190-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord True, and he is right that this is an important Bill. I very much welcome the repeal of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act—I was never a fan and I am pleased to see it go.

I hesitate to disagree on any occasion...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc192-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased to contribute to this debate. I signed Amendment 3 together with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, and other noble Lords.

I do not come to this as a constitutional expert—far from it—but I think I bring to it two objectives. One is to...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc193-5
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may ask my noble friend about a situation where there was a hung Parliament, where the Prime Minister had no majority—we have had that experience very recently—where a pandemic was taking place and where the Opposition did not co-operate in passing laws. Surely then it would be right...

Member
Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c194
House
House of Lords

There are many circumstances in which crises can emerge. There are arguments that cut both ways. In the midst of a pandemic, does one want an election? In the midst of a war, does one want an election? We could go back to 1940 and say, “Surely, if the Prime...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc194-6
House
House of Lords

This is an issue which divided the Joint Committee. The view expressed by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, was the view of a minority of the committee of which I was a member, whereas the majority did not want to go into this territory. We had a great...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c196
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had added my name to Amendment 2 in the name of noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Saltaire, but unfortunately it has not made it on to the Marshalled List that I have. I hope that is not an expression of editorial disapproval.

I congratulate the noble Lord on...

Member
Lord Lisvane (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c197
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not often agree with the noble Lord, Lord Wallace of Saltaire, as he knows, but I did agree with his closing remarks on Second Reading:

“We should never take democracy for granted: it needs to be defended.”—[Official Report, 30/11/21; col. 1332.]

I absolutely agree, which is why it...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc197-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel part of an endangered species: a Cross-Bencher who fully supports this government Bill. I would also like to go back to where we were before the ill-starred and ill-judged Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

I am against giving the Commons a veto, as proposed in Amendment 3 by my...

Member
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc198-200
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I comment specifically on the amendment in the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, I think that both the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Brown, have misread what happened in 2019. What happened then would have happened had...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc200-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like everybody else who has spoken in the Committee so far today, I share the objective of returning to the status quo ante and repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. But as some noble Lords who heard me speak on Second Reading may know, I do so for different...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc201-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I put my name to this amendment for the reasons given by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, and the noble Lord, Lord Lansley. Like the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, I have been searching for credible arguments against it. I was therefore very grateful that the Minister...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc202-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very puzzled by this debate. There have been words used such as “inappropriate”, “exceptional” and “misuse of power” to suggest that the Prime Minister of the day, when he or she asks the electorate to choose the Government, and where he puts his or her own...

Member
Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc203-4
House
House of Lords

I am glad to assist, but I would like to ask the noble Lord a question. I have already explained how a Prime Minister who wanted an election could get one, so the power remains with the Prime Minister.

7.30 pm

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c204
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is masked.

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c204
House
House of Lords

I am sorry. God, I will be glad when we get rid of those for good.

The noble Lord, Lord Sherbourne, said that, somehow or other, there is a suggestion that the argument on this side or around the House is that a Prime Minister calling for a general election is...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c204
House
House of Lords

I am very pleased that the noble Lord asked that question, because the debates this evening have said that we do not think the monarch could conceivably refuse a request for a Dissolution, as the noble Lord has already said. Other speakers have said that the House of Commons would...

Member
Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc204-5
House
House of Lords

I shall seek to answer the noble Lord’s question. I go back to February 1974. Imagine that Harold Wilson had said, “I’ve become the Prime Minister. I don’t have a majority. Mine is the largest party. I want to rerun the election straightaway.” Add into that mix—which was not the...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c205
House
House of Lords

I just think that if you gave the House of Commons the opportunity to veto it, and the Government of the day simply could not get on with their business, which is what would probably happen, then we would have a problem. I come back to the point I made...

Member
Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c205
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord asked for an example of where a Prime Minister might illegitimately ask for a general election. I will give an example not a million miles away from our present circumstances. Let us suppose that 54 Conservative Members of Parliament expressed no confidence in the present...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c205
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a very vivid recollection of Harold Wilson’s problem when he was elected with less than a parliamentary majority. As noble Lords will know, he had a second election in that year. At that time, I was the Sheriff Principal of Renfrew and Argyll, and therefore I...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc205-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all those who have spoken in what has rightly been a lengthy debate. Perhaps my concluding marks too will be lengthy; I trust not. I am grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part. Your Lordships will divine that some of those who have spoken...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc209-211
House
House of Lords

My Lord, if the Minister is going down the path of history, can he please address the specific point? On three occasions, the Prime Minister in—I agree with him—that dreadful Parliament, obtained a majority for a general election. That is not a theoretical speculation—it is fact.

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c211
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am coming on to that, as I just said to the House I would. You can look at those circumstances in different ways, I would submit. Perhaps I will deal with that and then go on to the other point.

The Government had effectively lost the confidence of...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc211-2
House
House of Lords

My noble friend must address the point. The point is that if the requirement were not what the Fixed-term Parliaments Act required but a simple majority on a Motion in the House of Commons, the Prime Minister back in October 2019 would have secured a simple majority and got his...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c212
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a conditional in that: a “would”. I believe that people must be presumed to intend the consequences of their own actions, and the consequence of Mr Corbyn’s actions was to thwart a general election three times. The figures I have given to the House are there...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc212-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I briefly point out that the definition of “Prorogation” that the Minister has just given does not cover the meaning of what the Prime Minister did in 2019. He might perhaps like to reconsider that definition if he wants to argue that the Prime Minister was behaving within...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc214-6
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Lord Judge

3: Clause 2, page 1, line 9, at end insert—

“(1A) The powers referred to in subsection (1) must not be exercised unless the House of Commons passes a motion in the form set out in subsection (1B).

(1B) The form of motion for the purposes of subsection (1A) is...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c216
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is rather fun to be clothed in the costume of a revolutionary who is about to tear down the constitution. I do not think anyone has ever thought of me in those terms, and my family will be absolutely fascinated by it.

I have found this an interesting...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc216-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Norton of Louth

4: Clause 3, page 1, line 17, leave out “or purported exercise”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment ensures that the ouster provision in clause 3 will not apply to the purported exercise of the powers to dissolve Parliament contained in clause 2.

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to my other two amendments in this group. The amendments would ensure that the ouster provisions in the clause did not apply to the purported exercise of the powers to dissolve Parliament contained in Clause 2. There are two principal arguments that I wish...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc217-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to the amendments in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, and to join the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell, in seeking to remove Clause 3 from the Bill. I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Norton, said in...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc218-221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Committee has shown in the debate on this Bill so far that there is common ground that this Bill should provide clarity. The use of “purported” in Clause 3 seems to be a deliberate choice by the Government and the parliamentary draftsmen. It is not a word...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc221-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall disagree with the noble Lord who has just spoken by opposing the inclusion of Clause 3 in the Bill, but first I thank the noble Lords, Lord True and Lord Wolfson, for extending to me the courtesy of a virtual discussion on this. They failed to...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc223-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with a Supreme Court judge, the chairman of the most recent inquiry into the workings of judicial review—he did an extremely good piece of work on that—and a former Cabinet Secretary presenting views that differ in more than nuanced ways, the House will have to resolve this issue....

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc225-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my core concern regarding this group of amendments is for the future generation of judges—not just in the Supreme Court, but judges who, I suggest, must inevitably be troubled at first instance and so forth before things get to the Supreme Court—if there is there is the slightest...

Member
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c226
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak only on Clause 3 stand part and not on the more detailed amendments, because I am sure that my noble friend the Minister will reply in his careful way about how the wording was arrived at and what it is intended to do, as he...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c227
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness and I agree that the circumstances in which this situation arises are unthinkable, so why should we have the dangerous precedent of this ouster clause in the Bill?

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c227
House
House of Lords

We have it because it is just possible that the courts could find a way in. We have seen them getting involved in areas that we never thought they would get involved in before. That is a fact of the way the judiciary has moved in recent years, and it...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc227-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if we are talking about our tried and tested constitution, we should remember that in the 17th century it was Chief Justice Coke and his defence of the rule of law against the extent of the royal prerogative which led to the development of some of the ideas...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c228
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord says that the clause does not restore the status quo. Does it follow that, in his view, the power to dissolve would have been justiciable at common law by virtue of the conventions?

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c228
House
House of Lords

I find it hard to imagine a situation in which the power of Dissolution would be used in the way that the power of Prorogation was used in 2019, so I do not think it likely that the case would arise. That is my instant opinion.

The radical dimension of this...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc228-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to think that the Minister will find this argument conclusive. If he had accepted the amendment on Clause 2 that so many noble Lords thought was valuable—to have parliamentary resolution for a general election—we would not have needed this debate on the ouster clause and...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc229-230
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been listening to this debate and it has been extremely interesting. I will not detain the House because it is late, but what I find interesting—I am talking more generally about Clause 3, although I fully accept some of the points made about the wording and...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c230
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will certainly seek to do so. I do not wish to pre-empt the Committee in any way. We obviously have other groups to come to. I anticipate that the debates on those will not be quite so lengthy but, given the importance of this amendment, I hope...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc231-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as noble Lords know, I am a lay man. I have read out the legal advice that I have been given that it should not fall to the courts to assess by reference to whether relevant considerations have been taken into account or irrelevant ones have been discounted....

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I seek to put into the record the points put to me by those who argue and maintain that this is necessary.

I will further address the specific question of bad faith that was raised. This touches on another area around “purported”. Bad faith was mentioned by Lord Reid...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

I want to clarify something. Clearly, one reason to include the word “purported” is to deal with the annulling of decisions that have begun to be put into effect. But the Minister referred earlier to the importance of protecting the political space for the particular decision involved in this legislation:...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

I heard what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, and the noble Lord, Lord Beith, said and I was going to, and will, come on to this point. I am trying to put a considered position on the record for the benefit of the House between Committee and Report.

By...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc236-7
House
House of Lords