Skip to main content

101-120 of 8,338 results for subject:Managers

Type

-
Early day motions (34)
+ Legislation (21) + Acts (4)
-
Public acts (4)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (10)
-
Statutory instruments (10)
+ Members' contributions (5,326)
-
Business questions (39)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (370)
-
Oral corrections (1)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (384)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (4,566)
+ Parliamentary committees (101) + Committee proceedings (63)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Select Committee reports (13)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (24)
+ Parliamentary papers (221)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (165)
-
House of Commons papers (43)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (1)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (246) + Debates (120)
-
Adjournment debates (10)
-
Backbench debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (63)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (71)
-
Debates on bills (70)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (5)
+ Formal proceedings (2)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (117) + Oral statements (31)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (28)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (86)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,901)
-
Business questions (39)
+ Oral questions (384)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (2,475)
+ Research briefings (15) + Commons Briefing papers (6)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (3)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, Amendment 83, in my name and those of the noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, and the noble Lords, Lord Holmes and Lord Tarassenko, would require the Secretary of State to publish and maintain a digital sovereignty strategy. Before the Recess, many of us participated in a debate on digital...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc150-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to my Amendment 166. It offers an alternative route to the same destination, although the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, is probably superior because it is fuller and more comprehensive; I readily concede that. Her amendment would add an important...

Member
Baroness Ludford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc151-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak in support of Amendment 83 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, to which I have added my name. In my speech, I will focus just on the aspects of the digital sovereign strategy that are relevant to the NHS. I speak as...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc153-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo the words of the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron: in the previous group, we probably would not have had anything like that debate if a clear strategy were indeed in place.

I will speak very briefly and in the context of other countries’ views of the safety and...

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc154-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments are highly pertinent. We simply must ensure that non-UK providers of services in this sector are firmly and wholly within the scope of the Bill—they are only partly in scope. For noble Lords who were not at Second Reading, I read out a coruscating report by...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c155GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the principles behind these amendments. A point was raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, and I wish to make the point in a different way. Many reasons have been shared during this debate, which I share. The noble Baroness, Lady Ludford, referred to the questions...

Member
Baroness Berger (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc155-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to this very strategic group of amendments. I use that word again because the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, made it quite clear from the outset that that is exactly what we lack: a clear national strategy. I pay tribute to her tenacity in tabling Amendment...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc156-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have added their names to the amendments and who have spoken in this debate. Both amendments in this group are underpinned by the same principle that national security and national technological capabilities deserve a unified plan—not one that targets some sectors and...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc157-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for continuing the debate with which we ended the previous session: the very important topic of the technological and digital sovereignty of the UK. That is very important to this Government and we are taking action on it. It possibly has not been focused on enough...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c158GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I point out to the Minister that not all is rosy in that particular cloud services garden. The CMA failed to designate those major US hyperscalers as having strategic market status, which, for many of us, was a rather extraordinary outcome.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c158GC
House
House of Lords

It has announced a series of measures, including actions from Microsoft and Amazon, to support greater choice for UK businesses and the public sector.

On my noble friend Lady Berger’s question, it is true that cloud spend is distributed across departments and managed through a range of departmental contracts and commercial...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc158-9GC
House
House of Lords

For clarification, that is on the spend, but my question is specifically about where the cloud services are hosted and/or whether they are under the jurisdictions of Governments beyond the UK. It was not just about what money is being spent; it was about who is responsible for it and...

Member
Baroness Berger (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c159GC
House
House of Lords

That is well noted.

For all digital services, as many noble Lords have pointed out, government departments are required to carry out robust security and resilience assessments in their procurement to ensure that the actions of foreign states or hostile actors cannot disrupt the delivery of public services. In June, the...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc159-160GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, I ask her to reflect, at the end of our second day in Committee, that the noble Viscount, Lord Camrose, has mentioned more than once that he would like to see a national cyber security strategy, but is not the takeaway from these two days...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c160GC
House
House of Lords

Going back to the point made by the noble Lord in an earlier intervention, the Bill is a substantive Bill that substantially increases coverage of the digital infrastructure on which much of our economy relies. That is a very important point. As I mentioned at the start of my remarks...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 c160GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all who have spoken for their excellent contributions. I will make three quick points. First, in the course of the afternoon, I opened the Explanatory Notes, which is always a bit of a danger. I just want to put on the record that paragraph 2 states:

“These...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 September 2026
Reference
859 cc160-2GC
House
House of Lords

The department wants the highest-quality leaders in our schools. However, executive remuneration must demonstrate clear value for money for pupils and parents and remain proportionate to that of individuals undertaking comparable roles in other parts of the public sector.

The evidence shows that, in some cases, executive pay has risen disproportionately...

Member
Georgia Gould (Labour)
Department
Department for Education
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
24 August 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has assessed the potential impact of the proposed executive pay approval process on recruitment to academy trust leadership posts.

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 August 2026
Reference
15514
House
House of Commons

The Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] is a wide-ranging bill that aims to reform the way the UK financial services sector is regulated. This briefing provides a summary of the bill’s second reading and committee stage in the House of Lords ahead of its further consideration at report.

Type
Lords Library Briefings - Bills
Date
11 August 2026
Reference
LLN-2026-0043

New clause 50 debated and negatived on division (4 to 9). New clause 51 debated and withdrawn. New clause 52 negatived on division (1 to 9). New clause 56 negatived on division (1 to 9). New clause 57, discussed with new clauses 58 and 104, debated and withdrawn. New clause...

Lead member
Karin Smyth
Answering member
Caroline Johnson
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Health Bill Committee
Date
16 July 2026
House
House of Commons