Skip to main content

501-600 of 1,442 results for subject:Spaceflight

Type

-
Early day motions (16)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Ballot bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (1,010)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Maiden speeches (7)
-
Oral answers to questions (71)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (72)
-
Prime Minister's questions (15)
-
Topical questions (10)
-
Proceeding contributions (866)
+ Parliamentary committees (70) + Committee proceedings (29)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (4)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (16)
-
Select Committee reports (19)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (9)
-
Select Committee written evidence (15)
+ Parliamentary papers (80)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (7)
-
Deposited papers (23)
-
House of Commons papers (42)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Treaties (4)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (91) + Debates (56)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (29)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (4)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (16)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (24)
-
Debates on bills (20)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (4)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Questions for short debate (3)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (33) + Oral statements (3)
-
Ministerial statements (3)
-
Written statements (30)
+ Parliamentary questions (303)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (72)
-
Prime Minister's questions (15)
-
Topical questions (10)
-
Written questions (227)
+ Research briefings (13) + Commons Briefing papers (5)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (2)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
POSTnotes (3)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The space sector, in addition to being part of our critical national infrastructure, underpins our value in the economy to the tune of £250 billion. This is not just about pushing the frontiers of human knowledge; it is also about creating jobs and helping to power our economy forward. That...

Member
Sam Gyimah (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
645 c447
House
House of Commons

I have a feeling that we are about to witness some rocket launches long before anything takes off from a site in Sutherland. Given the contribution that Glasgow makes to the space industry—more satellites are manufactured there than anywhere else in Europe, and pioneering research takes place in the space...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
645 c447
House
House of Commons

I am planning a trip to Scotland before the end of this month, and I will be discussing exactly those sorts of things with the universities.

Member
Sam Gyimah (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
645 c447
House
House of Commons

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I shall repeat a Statement made in another place by my honourable friend the Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation. The Statement is as follows:

“With permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a Statement today on a key development in...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1213-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for repeating the Statement made earlier in another place. We welcome this investment in the UK space sector. Having said that, the ink is scarcely dry on the Space Industry Act, a skeleton Act focusing, quite rightly, on important insurance concerns and...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1216
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these announcements are good news for Sutherland and Cornwall—if we have in future a space industry to use them. I am a member of the EU Sub-Committee on

the Internal Market. We recently visited Harwell, which is mentioned in this Statement. The scientists working in the industry there...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1216-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, for his generally positive response to the Statement. I hope I can answer most of his points, but I hope he will understand if I offer to write to him in greater detail on further points. I have to say that...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1217-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as vice-chairman of Eutelsat, which owns satellites rather than launchers. As the Minister says, there is a great deal of capability in the UK in satellite manufacture. There will also be huge growth in small satellites. However, it is not at all clear that...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1219
House
House of Lords

I shall look into what it is possible for me to release to the noble Lord in response to his question on publishing the business case. I certainly feel that we would want to be as open as possible about why we chose the site in the north of Scotland...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1219
House
House of Lords

In the Statement, Britain’s universities were praised for being at the top of the tree, but there is a significant problem here. I focused at Question Time on the paucity of qualified science teachers in primary schools. This runs right through our system; if we are to be competitive in...

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1219
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his intervention; I am sure the Government as a whole are grateful for the intervention he made earlier at Question Time. I was in the Chamber to hear it; if I remember correctly, I now know, as I did not...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1219
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope I will not surprise the Minister too much if I say that I share his disappointment at the attitude being

taken by the Commission towards the Galileo project. It is, to put it mildly, short-sighted, but it does lead me to a rather broader question: what...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1219
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that I would prefer to write to the noble Lord on that issue.

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1220
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a great deal in this Statement to be welcomed, but there are two practical issues that I wonder whether the Minister can say something about. First, who owns the land on which the proposed site in Sutherland is to be developed? Is the land already in...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1220
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I cannot help the noble and learned Lord as to the ownership of that land. On the second issue, he is right to point to the environmental impact of such a Statement. I am not fully au fait with the planning processes in Scotland—which local authority...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1220
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much welcome the Statement, which is forward-looking and much more proactive than is sometimes the case in this field. Will this site be used entirely for civilian activity or will there be room for Ministry of Defence activity as well, if its northerly latitude does not...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1220
House
House of Lords

I think that would have to be a question for the Ministry of Defence and the operators of the site, in terms of whatever satellites the MoD wanted to put up, the needs of those satellites and whether it wanted to do it from a civilian base or from elsewhere....

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 c1220
House
House of Lords

Statement on UK space policy.

Lead member
Sam Gyimah
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
645 cc439-447
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on UK space policy.

Lead member
Lord Henley
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
18 July 2018
Reference
792 cc1213-1220
House
House of Lords

Prestwick, with its clear weather, transport links and aerospace park, is one of the frontrunners to be a horizontal-launch spaceport. In 2016, the then Transport Minister said that the Government would no longer be picking spaceport sites, but the narrative around the current grant process seems to be reversing that. Will the Business Secretary clarify who will choose where launch facilities are developed: the space industry or the Government?

Asked by
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2018
Reference
645 c226
House
House of Commons

I am surprised that the hon. Lady has not welcomed the fact that the first commercial rocket site in Europe will be in Sutherland in the north of Scotland. We are keen to bring the next wave of innovation, which is horizontal launch, and it is the UK Space Agency, which brings together the expertise that is required, that will advise on the right location for it.

Answered by
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 July 2018
Reference
645 c226
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent progress his Department has made being made on establishing a site for a UK space launch facility.

Asked by
Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2018
Reference
162607
House
House of Commons

Q5

.

Steve Double (St Austell and Newquay) (Con):

The Government have stated their ambition for the UK to have 10% of the worldwide space industry by 2030. Central to achieving that is establishing our own launch capabilities within the UK, through UK spaceports. Cornwall is keen and ready to play a significant part in that, so will my right hon. Friend confirm that the Government are committed to the establishment of UK spaceports? Will she ensure that the right people get together to deliver this in Cornwall as soon as possible?

Asked by
Steve Double (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 May 2018
Reference
641 cc833-4
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has put in a good bid and is a good champion for Cornwall on this issue. He is absolutely right to say that our industrial strategy identifies the role of new markets, such as space launch, in driving growth across the UK. That is why we are delivering a programme to ensure that companies can offer small satellite launch and sub-orbital space flight from UK spaceports. On the specific issue relating to Newquay and Cornwall, strong enthusiasm for this new opportunity is being shown by Newquay airport and other locations around the UK, which is why in March the Government brought forward the Space Industry Act 2018 to support them and we have made £50 million available to enable small satellite launch and sub-orbital flight from UK spaceports. The space agency is considering funding to help kick-start promising projects and will be making announcements shortly.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 May 2018
Reference
641 c834
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what the timetable is for sites to be informed whether they have been successful in securing a grant towards development as a spaceport.

Asked by
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 May 2018
Reference
144941
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, when he plans to issue space port licences for (a) horizontal and (b) vertical take off.

Asked by
Bill Grant (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 May 2018
Reference
140842
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions he has had with the Civil Aviation Agency on licenses for space flights and the location of spaceports in (a) the UK and (b) Cornwall.

Asked by
Scott Mann (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2018
Reference
132242
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent discussions he has had with the UK Space Agency on Cornwall Newquay Airport's bid to become a spaceport.

Asked by
Scott Mann (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2018
Reference
132241
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
15 March 2018
Reference
CHAP 5 2018; 2018 c. 5

Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments agreed to. Privilege amendment removed.

Lead member
Baroness Sugg
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 cc596-600
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Sugg

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c596
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments cover issues debated during the passage of the Bill through both Houses.

I know noble Lords will agree that the Space Industry Bill is an important step to ensure that the UK space sector is at the forefront of a new commercial space

age. It is important that...

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 cc597-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very briefly, I am particularly pleased to see Amendment 1. The Minister gave those assurances during the debate and we tabled an amendment relating to the need to take environmental considerations into account. I recall saying at the time that one has to think of the impact on...

Member
Baroness Randerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c598
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may cover the other amendments to which the Minister referred. I welcome what the Government have done; she promised to do it and she has, and for that we are very grateful.

This gives me an opportunity to repair an omission from our earlier debates. These were...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c599
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we raised the issues covered by these amendments in the Lords, and the Minister assured the House that changes would be brought forward in the other place to address those concerns. We are pleased the Government have delivered on those assurances and warmly welcome the amendments. During the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 cc599-600
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I thank noble Lords for participating in this short debate and for their support for the amendments to the Bill. Indeed, this cross-party support has been clear during the passage of the Bill through your Lordships’ House. As ever, the scrutiny and analysis of noble Lords has...

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c600
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Sugg

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c600
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment removes the privilege amendment and is a procedural technicality. I beg to move.

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2018
Reference
789 c600
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1393
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to new clause 1, which is in my name and those of my right hon. and hon. Friends and would require the publication of an assessment of the impacts of leaving the EU on the space industry. I do not wish to take up too much...

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1393-4
House
House of Commons

If the guarantee is only for another two years, there will be a profound effect on research and development, particularly in universities. If there is no guarantee beyond that, there will be a great deal of uncertainty for both universities and the industry.

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1394
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right, and my constituency is affected by such uncertainty.

I repeat a point that I made during the passage of the Nuclear Safeguards Bill: we must remember that this is not just about funding. At a recent hearing of the Public Accounts Committee, of which I am...

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1394-5
House
House of Commons

I start by passing on the apologies of my hon. Friend the Member for Central Ayrshire (Dr Whitford), who has been heavily involved in the Bill since the beginning. Unfortunately, she is extremely unwell this week and has uncharacteristically heeded her daughter’s advice by staying at home, but she is...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1395-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a powerful speech that outlines the isolationist view that post-Brexit Britain is about to take. How does she square what the UK Government are saying about “global Britain” with the powerful points she has made this afternoon?

Member
David Linden (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1396
House
House of Commons

We all want to see the space industry succeed, and we want to see it succeed on a global playing field, but we need to get this right. Requiring an impact assessment would make a big difference. We need to probe further on where our space industry will find itself...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1396
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman speaks about growth in the industry. We heard a lot about growth on Second Reading, and the Minister has acknowledged the need for skills. Leaving aside new clause 2, but relevant to it, is there a case for cross-departmental work on developing those skills, given the complexity...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1397
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes an excellent point. I was about to say that I do not intend to divide the House on new clause 2, but I hope the Minister takes his point on board.

Member
Karl Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1397
House
House of Commons

Like the hon. Members for Oxford West and Abingdon (Layla Moran) and for Glasgow North West (Carol Monaghan) and my right hon. Friend the Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr Hayes), the Government want the UK to make the most of the opportunities that lie ahead. We want...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1397-8
House
House of Commons

I beg to ask leave to withdraw the clause.

Clause, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1398
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1398
House
House of Commons

Once again, this amendment stands in the name of my hon. Friend the Member for Central Ayrshire (Dr Whitford), who cannot be here this afternoon. New clause 3 will ensure that guidelines for spaceports are clear and published, and take into account the views of devolved Administrations and stakeholders. The...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1400-1
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Lady saying that the taxpayer should stand behind the extra liability above the cap?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1401
House
House of Commons

That is exactly how the liability works: the insurer covers up to whatever that liability is and the rest is picked up by Government. Once that is picked up by Government, we have to look at the revenue that is generated from that industry and at the amount of growth...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1401
House
House of Commons

In Committee, I heard the hon. Lady press the case for an unlimited liability cap. I also heard the Minister give an extraordinarily good and detailed explanation of the work that needed to go into the detailed preparation for such a cap. That is why it was decided in Committee...

Member
Vicky Ford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1401
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her contribution, but I think she is missing the point, which is that there must be a cap in place in order for these companies to get insurance. Without it, they cannot get insurance and without insurance, they cannot launch. If the Government are...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1401
House
House of Commons

I intend to speak briefly on this issue, having heard what the hon. Member for Glasgow North West (Carol Monaghan) said and having looked at these matters in my previous life, as it were. Liability is salient to this Bill. The Government have acknowledged that in what they have said...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1401-2
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak briefly to amendments 1, 2 and 3.

Amendment 1 deals with the catch-all powers in the Bill and, at your discretion, Madam Deputy Speaker, I shall seek to press it to a vote. In the House of Lords, the Government agreed to remove the Henry VIII power...

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1402-3
House
House of Commons

I understand the hon. Lady’s point, but she must know that a Bill of this type essentially establishes what I called earlier a framework of certainty. This is a highly innovative industry and technology changes very rapidly. To be prescriptive about what the future might look like would be a...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1403
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his intervention, but I disagree that the amendment would prevent innovation. I think it would be absolutely fine. The affirmative procedure is employed in 13 other parts of the Bill. Parliamentary scrutiny should not just be waved away, as it has been in...

Member
Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1403
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to amendment 4, which I tabled, as well as the remaining new clauses and amendments.

Amendment 4 would give clarity to the UK’s space industry. As it stands, the Bill makes no provision to ensure that the industry works with the Government to create the regulatory framework...

Member
Karl Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1403-4
House
House of Commons

There are 40,000 jobs in the UK space industry. Would it not deter investment if the Government did not implement a liability cap for the industry?

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1404
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. He is right to say that 40,000 jobs rely on such a measure. Colleagues on both sides of the House have made the point that investment may be deterred if that is not in place.

New clause 4 deals with this very important issue...

Member
Karl Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1404-5
House
House of Commons

I thank all hon. Members who have spoken to the measures tabled by the hon. Member for Central Ayrshire (Dr Whitford). In addition to new clause 3, she tabled new clause 4, which would introduce a mandatory requirement for the Government to lay a report before Parliament setting out their...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1406
House
House of Commons

It seems that the Minister has exceeded even my expectations. The big billing that I gave him was entirely justified, because he has addressed exactly the point that was made earlier: we need to know precisely what the circumstances are as launch facilities are developed. The combination of a call...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1406
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his support for the Government’s approach of gathering the evidence base in a call for evidence, and then, if necessary, holding a further consultation, particularly involving the devolved Administrations.

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1406
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister offer any timeframe for the consultation and the ongoing process, because the industry would welcome that?

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1407
House
House of Commons

The Government have committed to launch the call for evidence as soon as the Bill receives Royal Assent, which we hope will not be too long now. Should the evidence show that there is demand and a need for a liability cap of the kind that the hon. Lady has...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1407-8
House
House of Commons

I am happy to withdraw new clause 3, so I beg to ask leave to withdrawn the motion.

Clause, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1408
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.

The Space Industry Bill is a bold and important Bill which will ensure that the UK space sector is at the vanguard of the new commercial space age that is now under way. The UK has always been...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1409-1414
House
House of Commons

I thank the Government Front-Bench team for the spirit of co-operation in which the Bill has been handled, and I thank the Minister’s officials, who have worked very hard on it as well. I also thank my colleagues in the other place, where the Bill began,

for their very valuable...

Member
Karl Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1414-5
House
House of Commons

First, I would like to thank the Minister, who has moved seamlessly from his previous role into this new role and is not too far away from where he was a few months ago. I also thank the right hon. Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr Hayes) for...

Member
Carol Monaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 c1415
House
House of Commons

New clause 2 would ensure that Parliament is kept up to date on negotiations between the UK and the European Union in regard to the UK space industry.

New clause 2 differs very slightly from new clause 1, which was tabled by the hon. Member for Oxford West and Abingdon (Layla...

Member
Karl Turner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1396-7
House
House of Commons

Programme motion (No. 2) varying the Order of 15 January, and on proceedings on Report and Third reading. Report stage. New clause 1, discussed with new clause 2, debated and withdrawn. New clause 3, discussed with new clause 4, debated and withdrawn. New clause 4 negatived on division (33 to...

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
6 February 2018
Reference
635 cc1392-1415
House
House of Commons

This briefing paper provides an analysis of the Space Industry Bill 2017-2019. The paper provides an overview of the provisions in the Bill and the debate and amendments made during the House of Lords stages and Commons Committee stage.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
2 February 2018
Reference
CBP-8197

Amendment to clause 33 negatived on division (2 votes to 10). Another amendment debated and withdrawn. Clause 33 agreed to. Government amendments to clause 34 agreed to. Clauses 34 to 71 agreed to. Schedules 6 to 12 agreed to. Government new clause 1 (Grant of licences: assessments of environmental effects)...

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Space Industry Bill (HL) Committee
Date
23 January 2018
House
House of Commons

Programme motion agreed to. Written evidence to be reported to the House. Clause 1 agreed to. Amendment to clause 2, discussed with Government new clause 1 (Grant of licences: assessments of environmental effects), debated and withdrawn. Clauses 2 to 8 agreed to. Amendment to clause 9 debated and withdrawn, and...

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone
Answering member
Karl Turner
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Space Industry Bill (HL) Committee
Date
23 January 2018
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Very few people realise just how important the space industry is to our daily lives. Satellites, in particular, provide many critical services that we all take for granted. Navigation satellites provide the precision timing needed to enable global...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c648
House
House of Commons

I am a small shareholder in ManSat and president of the parliamentary space committee. The Minister said that satellite technology is one of this country’s specialities, but is he as concerned as I am by what I read in the newspapers about British companies being frozen out of bidding under...

Member
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c648
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his question. That is a subject of some concern and one that I had occasion to raise on numerous occasions with Commissioner Bieńkowska in my previous role as Science Minister. We want to ensure that our space sector continues to be able to compete...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc648-9
House
House of Commons

Certain regions in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will be able to have specific projects, but Northern Ireland will not. Will there be job opportunities for those with the qualities and the talent, even if they reside outside where the opportunities for businesses to create projects...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

Indeed. I was in Belfast just a few weeks ago for one of the UK launch programme’s roadshow events, where we gathered together small and medium-sized businesses in Northern Ireland with expertise in space to showcase all the benefits that are to be gained from participating in the programme and...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

If I am correct and the Bill will open the way for commercial space flights within the next 20 years, does the Minister realise that such flights will arrive many years quicker than Transport for the North’s proposals for improvements to transport in the north, including rail electrification to Hull?

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

We want to move forward on many fronts, and the Bill will enable us to capture some of the significant opportunities that are out there for British businesses in the space sector.

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

Given the fast growth of the sector and the fact that its businesses create jobs three times faster than the average British company, does the Minister share my concern about the lack of interest in this Bill from the Labour party?

Member
Vicky Ford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

The Bill has been developed collaboratively with the support and involvement of all parties, and I am grateful for the constructive approach taken by the Labour party. My hon. Friend is absolutely right,

however, to say that there are tremendous opportunities for British companies in the space sector. We have...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c649
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being generous with his time. Having worked with him for the past two years on helping to develop this country’s space industry, I absolutely share his vision for how fantastic things can be for Great Britain. There are many technical details that can help us to achieve...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c650
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend raises an extremely important point that was the subject of considerable discussion when the Bill was in the other place, and we will return to it in detail in Committee. For the time being, I can say that we recognise that launch from the UK is an...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c650
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister share my view that companies such as Reaction Engines, which is based in my constituency, hold the future for space vehicles that can be used over and over again?

Member
John Howell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c650
House
House of Commons

Indeed. Reaction Engines is a great example of the kind of British company that is well placed to take advantage of all the opportunities that the Bill will enable. We have been supporting Reaction Engines and its SABRE technology through Innovate UK and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c650
House
House of Commons

The Minister has just referred to the skills that will be supported by the Bill. Does he agree that it presents a real opportunity to inspire the next generation, so that those growing up across Oxfordshire can look to ensure that this country really excels in an area in which...

Member
Robert Courts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c650
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. There is nothing like space to generate STEM inspiration, which we saw when Tim Peake became one of the first British astronauts —if not the first British astronaut—to visit the International Space Station last year. We have seen on many occasions the power that space has to capture the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Marylebone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c651
House
House of Commons

It must be a blessed relief for Government Front Benchers to move their attention away from their trials and tribulations here on planet Earth and to lift their eyes up to the heavens. Much of the country is doing likewise, aghast in sheer disbelief at the Government’s continued appalling judgment...

Member
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc651-3
House
House of Commons

It is an honour and a pleasure to speak from the Back Benches for the first time not quite in a lifetime but in very many years. It is a particular pleasure to speak in a debate on a Bill that I helped to shape, as the Minister generously acknowledged....

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 cc652-4
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c654
House
House of Commons

Now I see the past coming back to haunt me.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c654
House
House of Commons

I wish to echo my right hon. Friend’s tribute to himself, as he was indeed a visionary on electric vehicles and there will in due course be a Hayes electric vehicle launched in this country.

Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c654
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend and I enjoyed many happy moments—it seemed much longer than that—on the Automated and Electric Vehicles Bill Committee recently. His contribution to that Committee, may I say with absolute seriousness, was very important. It helped to shape and hone the legislation in a way that, had...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c654
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend give way?

Member
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c655
House
House of Commons

This is going to be a relatively short speech, but I am happy to give way to my hon. Friend.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c655
House
House of Commons

I am more past than future, that is for certain, but I am as excited as my right hon. Friend about the potential for space development, particularly in a multi-billion industry in the UK, which is growing at an incredible 8% a year. As we have the desire to put...

Member
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2018
Reference
634 c655
House
House of Commons