Skip to main content

101-120 of 17,925 results for subject:Testing

Type

-
Early day motions (52)
+ Legislation (352) + Acts (12)
-
Public acts (12)
+ Bills (34) + Public bills (34)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (5)
+ Private members' bills (28)
-
Ballot bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (7)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (14)
+ Delegated legislation (306) + Statutory instruments (306)
-
Deregulation orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (9,703)
-
Business questions (52)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (572)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (590)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (33)
-
Points of order (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,533)
+ Parliamentary committees (277) + Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Select Committee reports (61)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (22)
-
Select Committee written evidence (46)
+ Parliamentary papers (874)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (75)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (9)
-
Deposited papers (586)
-
House of Commons papers (169)
-
House of Lords papers (15)
-
Impact assessments (82)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (13)
-
Treaties (9)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
+ Unprinted papers (9)
-
Draft deregulation orders (proposal) (3)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (749) + Debates (384)
-
Adjournment debates (63)
-
Backbench debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (4)
-
Emergency debate applications (2)
+ Legislative debates (229)
-
Debates on bills (150)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (79)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (13)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
-
Private notice questions (3)
+ Statements (338) + Oral statements (58)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (55)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (280)
-
Urgent questions (6)
+ Written corrections (7)
-
Ministerial corrections (6)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (6,815)
-
Business questions (52)
+ Oral questions (590)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (33)
-
Private notice questions (3)
-
Urgent questions (6)
-
Written questions (6,164)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (43) + Commons Briefing papers (19)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (10)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
POSTnotes (11)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her amendment and for linking the issue of cyber security with wider questions on national resilience; she is absolutely right to situate it in that space. I also thank her for introducing the topic of the right amount of cyber security support...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc180-1GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister, and I thank noble Lords for their support. This is clearly an area where we agree that there is a problem; we are very vulnerable in the United Kingdom. What we have in place is clearly not working sufficiently well if 60% of SMEs that are...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc181-2GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

148A: After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—

“Appeals against decisions under section 50

(1) A person may appeal to the Upper Tribunal against—

(a) a confirmation decision given to the person under section 50;

(b) a decision under section 50 to require the person to pay a penalty;

(c) the amount...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c183GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 148A stands in my name on the Marshalled List. This amendment would address a profound, structural and deeply disturbing gap in the judicial oversight and democratic accountability of the Bill. It represents a direct implementation of the authoritative recommendation of the Select Committee on the Constitution, in...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc183-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in addressing the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, I may increase his stress levels, unfortunately, as I oppose it. This means, I guess, that I am supporting the Government—that is, unless the Government are going to perform a volte-face in the face of...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc184-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this important group and all noble Lords for their contributions. Beginning with Amendment 148A, it is reasonable to suggest that there should be a further right to appeal, given that we are talking about potentially large penalties of £17...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc186-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their amendments, starting with Amendment 148A, from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which indeed

is in line with the recommendation from the Constitution Committee, which I thank for its report and its detailed scrutiny of this legislation.

As the noble Lord points out, Part 4 enables...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc187-8GC
House
House of Lords

I resume with Amendments 174A and 174B, which were introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Markham. They would require the Secretary of State to create a register of “foreign powers” that pose a threat to UK cyber security, to review this register and to lay the report in Parliament. This...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc188-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response and the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey and Lord Markham, for their contributions. I cannot help feeling that the approach to this by the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, is coloured by his history as a Minister. I can understand that because I saw the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c189GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

164: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Computer Misuse Act 1990: statutory defence for cyber security activities

(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, carry out and publish a review of whether the introduction of a statutory...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c190GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 164 is in my name and, I am delighted to say, that of the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom. Sadly, he is tied up next door with matters of national security—I hope that I am not giving away any secrets—and is unable to speak to this...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc190-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, whether technically or in spirit. He is right to point out how outdated the Computer Misuse Act is and that its blanket prohibition on undertaking cyber security activities without any public interest defence is ridiculous.

The noble Lord’s...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c193GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the campaign to reform the Computer Misuse Act is at least 10 years old, not just five. We—including me—have been working to try to get the provision that is contained in the amendment before us from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. I endorse every single word that he...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc193-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly in support of the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which he so comprehensively set out. I did not mention this at Second Reading because I thought it was so self-evidently sensible that this needed to be fixed. I should know better, having...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the advantages of being in this Committee Room for these debates in Committee is that I can use Claude—I hope that is allowed—to answer the question of what the cyber security community thinks about the Computer Misuse Act. The answer comes back in bold. I will...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this amendment and the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, whom I see in his place. I am sorry he was unable to attend the beginning of this debate, but we are told it was for very good reasons....

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc194-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising this topic through his amendment, and I recognise the strength of feeling on reforming the Computer Misuse Act. I agree that the UK should have the right legislative framework to allow us to tackle the threats posed by cyber criminals.

The Home...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc195-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. The noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said that we know what the Minister will say: that it will be in a future piece of legislation. To that extent, we are pleased that at least we have a commitment to it, but this has been...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Markham

174E: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Increasing resilience by reducing data retention

(1) The Secretary of State must, within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, open a consultation on the potential impact of minimising data collection and increasing data anonymisation on the...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc196-7GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 174E in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Camrose and Lord Holmes builds on the point I made in the debate last Thursday that the best defence in cyber is, of course, not to present an attractive target in the first place.

I go back to my...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c197GC
House
House of Lords