Skip to main content

301-350 of 4,194 results for subject:Dissolution

Type

+ Legislation (13) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (4,044)
-
Business questions (34)
-
Maiden speeches (28)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,998)
-
Speaker's rulings (4)
+ Parliamentary committees (25) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (17)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (55) + Debates (36)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (12)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (73)
-
Business questions (34)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (18)
+ Research briefings (29) + Commons Briefing papers (18)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords In Focus (2)
-
Lords In Focus - House of Lords (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, as the final Back-Bench speaker, I cannot help wondering whether I have been so placed because I supported the Fixed-term Parliaments Act when the Bill came through your Lordships’ House. While it may have been a political convenience for the coalition Government, as some have argued in this...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 cc1327-1330
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I take issue with the repetition of the phrase “tried and tested” by the Minister and others to defend prerogative power. The British people, the Minister declared, lived with the previous system for centuries. For several of those centuries, this country was at best semi-democratic. In the 17th...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 cc1329-1332
House
House of Lords

My Lords, indeed we should never take democracy for granted—although I have noticed over the years, with advancing age, that whenever the party on those Benches is resoundingly defeated at any election, whether by the Labour Party or the party on these Benches, it cries “Populism!”, “Foul!”, “Unfair!”. We have...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 cc1332-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an honour to make my maiden speech in your Lordships’ House. I will not dwell on the six generations of the Coke family who, in 162 years of taking their seat—or not—in this House, only mustered three speeches, two of them by my father, concerning the...

Member
Earl of Leicester (Conservative)
Type
Maiden speeches
Date
30 November 2021
Reference
816 cc1296-8
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Constitution Committee
Date
17 November 2021
Reference
HL 100 2021-22
House
House of Lords

The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill is a Government bill which would repeal the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011. It also would revive the prerogative power to dissolve Parliament and call a new Parliament. Second reading of the bill in the House of Lords is scheduled to take place on...

Type
Lords Library Briefings - Bills
Date
3 November 2021
Reference
LLN-2021-0029

Committee stage. Clause 1, considered with clauses 2-6, Schedule 1, amendments and new clauses. Clause 1 agreed to. Clause 2, agreed to on division (316 to 162). Clauses 3-6 and Schedule agreed to on question. Bill reported without amendment. Third reading agreed to on division (312 to 55). Queen's consent...

Lead member
Chloe Smith
Answering member
Cat Smith
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc714-756
House
House of Commons

May I initially seek your guidance, Chairman? Would you like me to cover all the clause stand parts and to respond, as it were, in advance to amendments? Or would you like me to return to respond to hon. Members once they have spoken to their amendments?

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c720
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much indeed, Dame Eleanor. I shall endeavour to do that, and I hope you will bear with me while I ensure that I cover all that material.

Let me begin at the beginning, with clause 1. There is consensus throughout the House that the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc720-1
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend help the House in respect of whether the Government acknowledge the existence of the Lascelles principles? If they do, what is the impact of clause 2 on those principles?

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c721
House
House of Commons

Of course the Government and I acknowledge the existence of those principles; they are a historical fact in and of themselves. I refer my right hon. and learned Friend to the fact that we have said consistently throughout the Bill’s preparation and progress so far that we believe that now...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c721
House
House of Commons

Does not the fact that the Prime Minister requests that the monarch take steps so that an election can happen show an understanding of the Lascelles principles? Indeed, there could be other circumstances, yet unforeseen, in which a request is refused.

Member
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c721
House
House of Commons

Yes, we believe that that is the case; that is the flexibility inherent within the constitutional arrangements that we seek to revive. That brings me back to the express purpose of clause 2, which delivers on the Bill’s purpose, which is, as I said, to reset back to the pre-2011...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc721-2
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that one benefit of clause 3, as well as highlighting all the issues that she has just mentioned, is that it makes it abundantly clear that Parliament is supreme?

Member
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c722
House
House of Commons

Yes, that is right. I am grateful to my hon. Friend and to all hon. and right hon. Members who served on the Joint Committee and spent a considerable amount of time looking at these issues. That is the kind of consideration that we ought to give to our constitutional...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c722
House
House of Commons

On clause 3, may I take the Minister back to the inclusion of the word “purported” and, in particular,

draw her attention to paragraph 166 and the comments of Baroness Hale in relation to the Joint Committee report? She says that

“it looks as if it is saying, “Well, even if...

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc722-3
House
House of Commons

This is a good opportunity for me to be absolutely clear about the reference to the word “purported” in this clause. This has been included to take account of previous judicial decisions—in particular the cases of Anisminic Ltd v. the Foreign Compensation Commission 1969, and Privacy International v. the Investigatory...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c723
House
House of Commons

In the interests of clarity, is the Minister telling the House that the Government are asking Parliament to give them the power to do things that exceed the powers given to them and that nobody should be able to gainsay them?

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c723
House
House of Commons

I am proposing that the House understands the use of the phrase “purported”, which, clearly, the right hon. Gentleman does—I have no dispute with him on that point—and that hon. Members join us in acknowledging that it is right to be aware of the case law and to respond to...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc723-4
House
House of Commons

But it is not actually five years; it is five years and a bit, is it not? As the Septennial Act 1716 did, it goes from the date of the first sitting of the new Parliament. It means that, if we stick with this, we will have the longest period...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c724
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman pre-empts my remarks in respect of his amendment, which I will endeavour to come to after I have worked through all the clauses.

The scheme that we are proposing is the right one and I will come in a moment to why I think that that is the...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc724-5
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Nigel Evans (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c725
House
House of Commons

In that case, Mr Evans, I am going to carry on until you tell me otherwise. There is an amount to get through, but I hope to do so.

The schedule provides for a number of changes to primary and secondary legislation to ensure the effective operation of the statute book...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc725-7
House
House of Commons

If a Prime Minister were to request a Dissolution that was proper but was perceived to be for political advantage and was premature, would not the remedy be in the hands and judgment of the electorate?

Member
Aaron Bell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c727
House
House of Commons

Yes, that is precisely the point, and that underlies a number of our considerations. In the place of a prescriptive statutory scheme, we can place our trust instead in the ability of people to choose against the behaviour that they observe from parties in Parliament.

Let me turn to new clause...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c727
House
House of Commons

If the largest party was trying to get a coalition, that might take more than 14 days. Is there provision in the legislation to cover that?

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c727
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes precisely the point that goes to the new clause, which is that a Government would, I would have thought, want to assemble faster than 14 days, but there can be occasions when more than 14 days may be needed. Therefore, both these arguments point to flexibility,...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc727-8
House
House of Commons

All right then, if it is the simplest way of doing it, what is the last date that the next general election can be held if all this is carried as the Minister says?

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c728
House
House of Commons

With respect, that is not the right quiz question—the right quiz question is whether, under the hon. Gentleman’s amendment, the period would be five years plus 25 days. That would, I believe, arise from his amendment, because he is not counting the length of the election campaign, whereas our provision...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc728-9
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is of course making an excellent speech. The intent behind the new clause, which I will explain more fully when I go through it in detail, is to do exactly what she was calling for earlier, which is to have a clearer and more easily understood scheme....

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c729
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. This is a good opportunity to remind ourselves that we have not necessarily observed a 25 working day timetable. For example, the 2017 election, known to have been rather a long one, was considerably longer than that minimum statutory period. It is important, as my right hon. Friend says,...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c729
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend feel that the debate on this presents the opportunity for a further piece of work on the period from when a Prime Minister dissolves Parliament to when the 25 days should start? I appreciate that this Bill is not really the appropriate moment for that, but...

Member
Alec Shelbrooke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c729
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend. Some of what he refers to is not necessarily within a statutory scheme but within, for example, the processes of this House, but he makes a valuable point. We do need to look at the evidence in this area; that will clearly...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c729
House
House of Commons

Just for clarification on those comments, are the electoral services referring to the 25 working days, not a period leading up to that, and saying that they are confident that they can always achieve their work in the short campaign as defined, not relying on any period of time before...

Member
Alec Shelbrooke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c729
House
House of Commons

I believe that to be the case, although of course I would not wish to speak for the AEA. I really do commend its report to the Committee to enable it to see in much more detail the challenges that there are in delivering elections within the timetable that currently...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

We would all wish to maximise participation in elections, and the practicalities of overseas voters, postal voters and voter registration are very important, but do we also need to look at the possibility that as campaigns go on and on, we might get campaign fatigue, which might well result in...

Member
Robert Goodwill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

I am always sympathetic to that point. There is always a risk when any of us have to bang on too long that we simply get boring, and I can already apologise to the House for having taken 50 minutes of tonight’s Committee in trying to make my way through...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

On the wider point about how quickly an election takes place, can I take it as read from the Minister that the Government will always immediately move a writ for a by-election, and not drag it on any longer than usual?

Member
David Linden (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

If only I had the ability to give the hon. Gentleman that promise, I think I would have promoted myself to Chief Whip and other positions in a single move. I do not think I should be drawn on the dark ways of the Chief Whip and the usual channels....

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

I want to take my hon. Friend back to the point about 2013 and why the period became 25 working days. She mentioned postal votes and electronic registration, but surely the clue is in the title: electronic registration. Anything done electronically is supposed to be much quicker and clearer. Does...

Member
Craig Whittaker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

Again, some incredibly thoughtful points are being put. My hon. Friend is right to observe that the introduction of online registration has enormously sped up how people can register, and he draws me to talk about two things. The first is to acknowledge what needs to be done to ensure...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Alec Shelbrooke (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Aaron Bell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c730
House
House of Commons

I will not give way to my right hon. Friend the Member for Elmet and Rothwell (Alec Shelbrooke) again, if he will forgive me. I will give my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle-under-Lyme (Aaron Bell) a go.

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c731
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend said a moment ago that she could not speak exactly for the AEA, but she will know from the open letter that it wrote to her that it wants even more time. It is proposing an extended 30-day timetable to

“increase capacity, introduce resilience and ensure electors are...

Member
Aaron Bell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c731
House
House of Commons

I am happy to confirm from this Dispatch Box that the Government’s position is to maintain the electoral timetable as it stands—I am not proposing an extension or reduction—but I draw the threads together as follows. We need to ensure that the system works for voters, and that includes them...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc731-2
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c732
House
House of Commons

I am afraid I have not got time to give way; I need to draw my remarks to a close. I look forward to the hon. Member for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr being able to say more about his amendment, which he has not yet had a chance to do....

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c732
House
House of Commons

The Bill does two things: it repeals the Fixed-term Parliaments Act; and reinstates—or attempts to reinstate—the status quo that existed before 2011. The Labour party supports the repeal of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, which we committed to in our 2019 manifesto, because the Act undermined motions of no-confidence and removed...

Member
Cat Smith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 cc732-3
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that the new clause is a much more effective way of keeping the courts out? The ouster clause is a bit like a red flag or saying to someone, “Don’t think of an elephant”—they will think of an elephant. It is saying to the courts,...

Member
Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 September 2021
Reference
700 c733
House
House of Commons