Skip to main content

141-160 of 16,169 results for subject:Technology

Type

-
Early day motions (32)
+ Legislation (65) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (11) + Public bills (11)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (10)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (8)
+ Delegated legislation (53)
-
Statutory instruments (53)
+ Members' contributions (10,534)
-
Business questions (26)
-
Maiden speeches (16)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,049)
-
Oral question time interventions (8)
+ Oral questions (1,118)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (87)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,355)
+ Parliamentary committees (642) + Committee proceedings (279)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
European Committee proceedings (6)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (210)
-
Select Committee reports (166)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (77)
-
Select Committee written evidence (139)
+ Parliamentary papers (1,351)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (135)
-
Consultation papers (54)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (8)
-
Deposited papers (580)
-
House of Commons papers (506)
-
House of Lords papers (71)
-
Impact assessments (12)
-
Treaties (45)
-
Unprinted command papers (7)
-
Unprinted papers (47)
-
White papers (8)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (733) + Debates (478)
-
Adjournment debates (53)
-
Backbench debates (6)
-
Budget debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (279)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (15)
-
European Committee proceedings (6)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (29)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (210)
-
Debates on select committee reports (20)
-
e-petition debates (1)
-
Estimates days (3)
+ Legislative debates (128)
-
Debates on bills (92)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (36)
+ Monarch's speech debates (5)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (4)
-
Opposition days (4)
-
Questions for short debate (12)
-
Topical debates (1)
+ Formal proceedings (5)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (5)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (225) + Oral statements (48)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (177)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (6)
-
Ministerial corrections (6)
+ Parliamentary questions (4,565)
-
Business questions (26)
+ Oral questions (1,118)
-
Prime Minister's questions (38)
-
Topical questions (87)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (3,419)
+ Petitions and observations (3)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (167) + Commons Briefing papers (43)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (21)
+ Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (9)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (6)
-
POSTbriefs (4)
-
POSTnotes (89)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I too welcome the fact that the Government are consulting on how to improve road safety, and I am sure that the noble Lord would agree that any response to that consultation needs to be evidence-based. In that light, how does he take account of the fact that it appears from Scotland, where the limit has been reduced, that there has been no discernible effect on accidents as a result of that measure?

Asked by
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1031
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right that we should respect the evidence. Scotland’s experience is relevant, but it is not the only evidence. The Government recognise that Scotland did not see a significant casualty reduction, but we also cite wider evidence that alcohol impairs driving ability below the current England and Wales limit. Evidence cited in the consultation found that drivers with a blood alcohol concentration of 20 milligrams to 50 milligrams per 100 millilitres have at least a three-times greater risk of dying, and we will certainly take that into account when we decide what to do as a result of the consultation.

Answered by
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, alcolocks take an hour to fit, they cost £200 to fit, paid for by the user and, as the noble Lord said, they work while they are being used. Why are we not using them to save lives?

Asked by
Lord Hampton (Crossbench; Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1031
House
House of Lords

I said that we are consulting on the first comprehensive road safety strategy for many years. It is right to consult, because a number of things in the road safety strategy—not just this one—affect many people, we need to hear from everybody, and we have heard from many people what they think of the proposals in the road safety strategy. I would say to him that it is worth waiting for, because it is not right to legislate before you understand what all the evidence is.

Answered by
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I might ask the Minister, given that there have been questions both about reducing the threshold for drink driving but also about enforcement from the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter,

what is the Government’s assessment, because it was not clear from the road safety plan, of the biggest contributor to deaths and injuries on the roads? Is it people who do not obey the existing limit, or is it people who obey the existing limit but are none the less not safe to drive?

Asked by
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1031
House
House of Lords

I have to say there is a whole range of factors that go into it. The reason for the road safety strategy is that the death and serious injury rate has plateaued, rather than going down. The strategy has made it clear that there are a number of reasons for that. If there were only one issue in the strategy, with one consultation, that would be different, but there is a wide range in there intended to make all road users, including pedestrians and cyclists, safer. I think it is right, if the noble Lord reads the whole thing, to look at a number of solutions to this.

Answered by
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
857 c1032
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the merits of running a pilot scheme to assess intervening intelligent speed assistance technologies for repeat speeding offenders.

Asked by
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
HL996
House
House of Lords

What work is the Department doing to learn from international best practice—for example, in Estonia—when it comes to using technology in the justice system to help deliver swifter justice for victims?

Asked by
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
788 c762
House
House of Commons

When I moved to this Department, I was pleased to see the work on digital and artificial intelligence. The Department is a Whitehall leader; for example, we are freeing up probation staff for the frontline, rather than them having to go through lots of bureaucracy. I am particularly excited by the work that is going on in our courts.

Answered by
David Lammy (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
788 c762
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the UK‑Germany Strategic Science and Technology Partnership on Northern Ireland.

Asked by
Gregory Campbell (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
12637
House
House of Commons

That this House notes growing calls to end contracts with companies such as Palantir, Cisco and Oracle which are supplying technology used by Israel in its crimes against Palestinians; further notes that such technologies for mass surveillance enable arbitrary arrest and rights abuses against Palestinians in detention, and that technologies...

Primary sponsor
Apsana Begum (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
486
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what discussions she has had with operating system providers, device manufacturers, app stores and retailers on the implementation of device-level protections for children; which categories of company would be covered by future legislation; and whether liability would apply to companies...

Asked by
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
10621
House
House of Commons

2025 saw the highest ever number of new solar panel installations in the UK. Amid volatile electricity prices, can small-scale solar reduce electricity bills, and what challenges remain in its rollout?

Type
POSTnotes
Date
26 June 2026
Reference
POST-PN-0771

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's press release entitled £35 million government funding boost to stop drones smuggling contraband into prisons, published on 11 June 2026, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing drone-jamming and signal disruption technologies in...

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2026
Reference
10952
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to his Department's press release entitled £35 million government funding boost to stop drones smuggling contraband into prisons, published on 11 June 2026, whether he plans to introduce drone-jamming and signal disruption technologies across the prison estate.

Asked by
James McMurdock (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2026
Reference
10951
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment has been made of the potential merits of using specialist technologies for improving the life of ageing infrastructure.

Asked by
Jack Rankin (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
11924
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment has been made of the potential impact on (a) UK business, (b) the UK tech industry and (c) wider impacts of decreases in AI funding.

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
11729
House
House of Commons

The Trump Administration’s decision to deny access to Anthropic’s most powerful AI models to all foreigners—including the British state—has emphasised concerns over technology sovereignty. Will the Minister ensure that as part of the UK-EU summit, our leading technology sector works closely with European Union allies to ensure that we have greater competition and resilience in our technology stack?

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
788 c495
House
House of Commons

There are a number of areas where additional work with the European Union will be in our national interest. One of the great advantages of having annual UK-EU summits is that precisely those issues can be brought up.

Answered by
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 June 2026
Reference
788 c495
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help improve public understanding of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and gene editing.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
8047
House
House of Commons