Skip to main content

1-20 of 660 results for answeredby:"Ann McKechin"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, how many people in Scotland will be affected by the Government's plan to limit the uprating of in-work benefits to one per cent.
Asked by
Gregg McClymont (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
9 January 2013
Reference
135625; 556 c300
House
House of Commons

Scotland Bill. Programme motion (No. 2), varying the motion of 27 January 2011, on proceedings on Report and Third reading, agreed to on question. Report stage debate. New clause 5, discussed with new clauses 8, 9 and 19, debated and added to the Bill. New clauses 5 and 6, and...

Lead member
David Gauke
Answering member
Ann McKechin
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
21 June 2011
Reference
530 c220-94
House
House of Commons
As I said earlier, the Inland Revenue already has a business support package, which we introduced last year, to defer tax payments. More than 18,000 Scottish businesses have benefited and more than £300 million of tax has already been deferred. It is, however, important that HMRC is operationally independent, and its job is to protect the interests of the UK taxpayer.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c960
House
House of Commons
It is interesting to note that the unemployment rates in the hon. Gentleman's constituency are among the lowest in the United Kingdom. That is because of Labour policies, which are creating jobs and supporting people through the recession. The future jobs fund has benefited more than 10,500 people in Scotland by helping them and keeping them close to the job market. It is because of the UK's policies, taking the tough decisions that the Liberal Democrats would care to ignore, that we have got through this recession much quicker than they would have.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman should remember that output in the highlands and islands has risen by 75 per cent. since the Labour Government were elected in 1997, and there are 220,000 more jobs in Scotland since we were elected in 1997. Through our real help to businesses, including the business support scheme, which I again point out has benefited more than 18,000 small businesses in Scotland, we have helped to keep people on the road and to get Scotland into recovery.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c952
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman forgets that since 1997 there are 220,000 more Scots in employment, courtesy of a Labour Government. We are determined to continue the recovery, which is why the national insurance increase will not occur until next year, at which point all predictions show that we will have a strong and sustainable recovery. Under this Government, when we have increased national insurance, jobs have continued to rise.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c958
House
House of Commons
Well, I will tell the hon. Gentleman what we certainly will not do. We will not halt recovery in its tracks by cutting public investment now and squeezing off our recovery. He can be sure that the Labour Government are determined to ensure that the recovery works.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c958
House
House of Commons
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Secretary of State for Scotland has regular discussions with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions about the level of economic inactivity in Scotland.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c957
House
House of Commons
Both the Secretary of State and I have regular discussions with the Advocate-General on a variety of issues.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953
House
House of Commons
Official data showing Scotland's gross domestic product for the end of last year have not yet been published by the Scottish Government, but most indications suggest that Scotland emerged from recession in the fourth quarter of 2009, although the recovery is fragile. The Government are committed to doing all that is necessary to help to drive recovery in the Scottish economy.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c959-60
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland pursuant to the answer of 13 January 2010, Official Report, column 961W, if he will seek the consent of the Scottish Parliament to extending the provisions of the Anti-Slavery Day Bill to Scotland.

Asked by
Anthony Steen (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c1396-7W; 325099
House
House of Commons
The management of prisons in Scotland is, of course, a matter for the Scottish Government's Ministry of Justice. We have policies and procedures in place to prevent contraband from coming into removal centres, but we would not comment on the details because that might compromise the safety of the centre.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c959
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on levels of contraband in immigration removal centres in Scotland.
Asked by
Andrew Pelling (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c959; 325094
House
House of Commons
When he last met the Advocate-General to discuss devolution issues.
Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953; 325087
House
House of Commons
What his most recent assessment is of the state of the economy in Scotland; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
John Barrett (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c959-60; 325096
House
House of Commons
What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on the level of economic inactivity in Scotland.
Asked by
Brian H Donohoe (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c957; 325092
House
House of Commons
The Secretary of State has had no recent meetings to discuss levels of contraband in the immigration removal centre in Scotland.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c959
House
House of Commons
The Calman commission recommended a number of ways in which we could improve intergovernmental relationships, and we are very keen to take them forward. It is regrettable that the Scottish Government have declined to accept those recommendations, which have been supported by the majority in the Scottish Parliament. I note the hon. Gentleman's concerns, which I share, regarding the release of Mr. al-Megrahi, but at the end of the day that was a decision solely for the Scottish Government.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953-4
House
House of Commons
The hon. Lady might be aware that there was recently a case in the Supreme Court regarding the competency of the legislation of the Scottish Parliament. I think that would provide valuable guidance. At the end of the day, when we have difficulties in terms of our relationship with the Scottish Government, we have very detailed procedures with joint ministerial committees in which we can work together to find solutions to problems rather than necessarily considering court action. The fact that the Advocate-General has not needed to take one single case to the Supreme Court since devolution is a symbol of its success.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend might be referring to the shadow Secretary of State's unfortunate experience yesterday when his campaign got derailed on day one by inanimate objects. However, I certainly take my hon. Friend's points on board.
Answered by
Ann McKechin (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 April 2010
Reference
508 c953
House
House of Commons