1-20 of 1,507 results for answeredby:"Child Support Agency"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.276 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- answeredby:"Child Support Agency"
- We searched for
- answeringMember_ses:20357 OR answeringDept_ses:20357 OR askedToReplyAuthor_ses:20357
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps he is taking to reduce the amount of time taken to make Child Support Agency assessments; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps he is taking to reduce the amount of time taken to make Child Support Agency assessments; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the cost-effectiveness of the operational improvement plan in place at the Child Support Agency.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the cost-effectiveness of the operational improvement plan in place at the Child Support Agency.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when he expects the transfer of historical child maintenance cases on to the Child Support Agency's new system for calculating maintenance payments to be complete.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when he expects the transfer of historical child maintenance cases on to the Child Support Agency's new system for calculating maintenance payments to be complete.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps the Government takes to monitor the debt collection strategies of bailiffs appointed by the Child Support Agency.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps the Government takes to monitor the debt collection strategies of bailiffs appointed by the Child Support Agency.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the (a) mean and (b) median number of days was for child maintenance to be sent to parents with care after the non-resident parent had made payment in (i) the most recent period for which figures are available and...
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the (a) mean and (b) median number of days was for child maintenance to be sent to parents with care after the non-resident parent had made payment in (i) the most recent period for which figures are available and...
| The mean and median number of days for child maintenance to be forwarded to the parents with care after the non-resident parent made payment, from September 2006-09 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Receipt received | Mean days | Median days |
| September 2006 | 13.2 | 2 |
| October 2006 | 12.0 | 2 |
| November 2006 | 11.9 | 2 |
| December 2006 | 11.5 | 2 |
| January 2007 | 9.9 | 2 |
| February 2007 | 9.7 | 2 |
| March 2007 | 9.2 | 2 |
| April 2007 | 9.3 | 2 |
| May 2007 | 8.5 | 2 |
| June 2007 | 7.5 | 2 |
| July 2007 | 7.4 | 2 |
| August 2007 | 7.3 | 2 |
| September 2007 | 7.4 | 2 |
| October 2007 | 6.9 | 2 |
| November 2007 | 5.8 | 2 |
| December 2007 | 5.3 | 2 |
| January 2008 | 4.7 | 2 |
| February 2008 | 4.3 | 2 |
| March 2008 | 4.4 | 2 |
| April 2008 | 3.9 | 2 |
| May 2008 | 4.1 | 2 |
| June 2008 | 3.5 | 2 |
| July 2008 | 3.4 | 2 |
| August 2008 | 2.9 | 2 |
| September 2008 | 2.2 | 1 |
| Notes: | ||
| 1. Only includes receipts and payments for cases held on the current computer system (CS2) and represents 70 per cent. of the Agency caseload. Management information is not available for the 30 per cent. of cases held on the old computer system (CSCS). | ||
| 2. Information provided calculates time between receipt arriving in Agency's bank account and the Agency forwarding payment to the parent with care. | ||
| 3. Mean—the average number of days taken, which will take into account all payments, including the minority of payments where there has been a significant delay, and as such can be significantly altered by a few extreme cases. | ||
| Median—the middle figure in a series. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will break down by (a) parliamentary constituency and (b) local authority the debt owed to the Child Support Agency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will break down by (a) parliamentary constituency and (b) local authority the debt owed to the Child Support Agency in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when the hon. Member for West Lancashire's constituent Ms Helen L. Dunham will (a) be sent any backdated monies from the Child Support Agency and (b) have her manual child maintenance payments resumed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when the hon. Member for West Lancashire's constituent Ms Helen L. Dunham will (a) be sent any backdated monies from the Child Support Agency and (b) have her manual child maintenance payments resumed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of children live in families receiving Child Support Agency payments.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of children live in families receiving Child Support Agency payments.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency cases are being dealt with manually.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency cases are being dealt with manually.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average length of a repayment schedule agreed with the Child Support Agency is.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average length of a repayment schedule agreed with the Child Support Agency is.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what measures he has put in place to facilitate the clearing of arrears in child maintenance owed by absent parents; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what measures he has put in place to facilitate the clearing of arrears in child maintenance owed by absent parents; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was paid in compensation by the Child Support Agency to (a) parents with care of one or more children and (b) non-resident parents in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was paid in compensation by the Child Support Agency to (a) parents with care of one or more children and (b) non-resident parents in each of the last five years.
| Number and value of payments made by Child Support Agency for financial loss, compensation for delay and consolatory payments | ||||||
| Actual financial loss | Compensation for delay | Consolatory | ||||
| Number of payments authorised | Total value of payments (£ million) | Number of payments authorised | Total value of payments (£ million) | Number of payments authorised | Total value of payments (£ million) | |
| 1998-99 | 4,300 | 3.3 | 1,100 | 0.3 | 4,200 | 0.6 |
| 1999-00 | 3,700 | 1.8 | 700 | 0.3 | 4,500 | 0.5 |
| 2000-01 | 5,200 | 1.9 | 800 | 0.2 | 6,600 | 0.7 |
| 2001-02 | 6,300 | 1.6 | 900 | 0.2 | 8,300 | 0.7 |
| 2002-03 | 5,900 | 1.3 | 700 | 0.2 | 8,400 | 0.7 |
| 2003-04 | 4,900 | 1.4 | 800 | 0.1 | 5,600 | 0.4 |
| 2004-05 | 7,100 | 2.4 | 1,700 | 0.1 | 9,000 | 0.6 |
| 2005-06 | 5,900 | 3.1 | 2,100 | 0.2 | 9,200 | 0.6 |
| 2006-07 | 4,700 | 2.5 | 1,900 | 0.4 | 9,200 | 0.7 |
| 2007-08 | 4,700 | 3.4 | 1,900 | 0.4 | 9,300 | 0.7 |
| Notes: | ||||||
| 1. Figures relate to payments made only. It is not possible to identify how many of the payments authorised were for individual clients, or whether the clients were parents with care or non-resident parents. | ||||||
| 2. Number of authorised payments rounded to nearest 100. Value of payments rounded to nearest £0.1 million. | ||||||
| 3. Figures to 2007-08 show payments awarded in each year for actual financial loss, compensation for delay and consolatory payments. These will include timing differences when reconciling the Annual Report and Accounts. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost to the public purse of the Child Support Agency was in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost to the public purse of the Child Support Agency was in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency cases under (a) the old and (b) the new scheme are open.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency cases under (a) the old and (b) the new scheme are open.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many maintenance calculations were made by the Child Support Agency in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many maintenance calculations were made by the Child Support Agency in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
| Current scheme initial maintenance calculations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Britain | North East | South Tyneside | Jarrow | |
| 2003-04 | 68,500 | 2,900 | 200 | 100 |
| 2004-05 | 94,200 | 4,700 | 300 | 200 |
| 2005-06 | 126,000 | 6,900 | 500 | 200 |
| 2006-07 | 134,700 | 7,500 | 500 | 200 |
| 2007-08 | 141,500 | 8,700 | 600 | 300 |
| Notes: | ||||
| 1. Figures include all current scheme cases with an initial maintenance calculation. | ||||
| 2. As the current scheme came into existence in 2003, figures only go back to this date. | ||||
| 3. Cases have been allocated to the North East region, Jarrow parliamentary constituency and South Tyneside local authority by matching the postcode of the parent with care against the Office for National Statistics postcode directory. | ||||
| 4. Many cases can be re-assessed during their lifetime. Management information for current scheme cases only captures the number of initial assessments. Management information also exists on the date of the latest assessment for current scheme cases. However, as many cases could have been re-assessed many times between the initial assessment and latest assessment, a large proportion of re-assessments are excluded from the data. For this reason, only initial assessments have been included in the information provided. | ||||
| 5. CSCS calculations are not included in these figures. When a CSCS case is closed it is removed from the management information. A large proportion of CSCS cases will have closed and therefore the initial calculation date cannot be extracted from them. | ||||
| 6. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment has been made of the financial effects on parents without care facing debt recovery action for outstanding child maintenance payments by the Child Support Agency of the sanction of (a) 40 per cent. deductions on net income and...
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment has been made of the financial effects on parents without care facing debt recovery action for outstanding child maintenance payments by the Child Support Agency of the sanction of (a) 40 per cent. deductions on net income and...
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what guidance is issued by the Child Support Agency on absent fathers who pay larger than average contributions into their pension scheme thereby reducing the sum payable in child maintenance; and if he will amend this guidance to combat this...
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what guidance is issued by the Child Support Agency on absent fathers who pay larger than average contributions into their pension scheme thereby reducing the sum payable in child maintenance; and if he will amend this guidance to combat this...
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many new scheme cases were cleared by the Child Support Agency within six months in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many new scheme cases were cleared by the Child Support Agency within six months in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
| Child Support Agency—Current scheme case clearances under six months old | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearances under six months old | ||||
| Month | Great Britain | North East | South Tyneside | Jarrow |
| 2003-04 | 113,100 | 4,200 | 300 | 200 |
| 2004-05 | 137,200 | 4,400 | 300 | 200 |
| 2005-06 | 190,900 | 5,900 | 400 | 200 |
| 2006-07 | 219,000 | 6,100 | 400 | 200 |
| 2007-08 | 260,000 | 9,100 | 600 | 300 |
| Notes: 1. Figures include all current scheme application clearances under six months old. 2. As the current scheme came into existence in 2003, figures only go back to this date. 3. Cases have been allocated to the North East region, Jarrow parliamentary constituency and South Tyneside local authority by matching the postcode of the parent with care against the Office for National Statistics postcode directory. 4. Applications may be classed as cleared when the application is rejected or withdrawn. These applications can be rejected or withdrawn without the full address details of the non-resident parent or parent with care being recorded on the CS2 or CSCS computer systems and so can not be allocated to a geographical area. Such clearances are included in the Great Britain total but excluded from the regional breakdowns. Over 35 per cent. of clearances of applications under six months old fall into this category. 5. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. 6. '-' indicates a figure less than 50. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency new scheme cases have been uncleared within six months in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Child Support Agency new scheme cases have been uncleared within six months in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997.
| Current scheme uncleared applications over six months old | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncleared applications over six months old | ||||
| Month | Great Britain | North East | South Tyneside | Jarrow |
| June 2003 | 2,800 | 100 | — | — |
| June 2004 | 79,500 | 3,900 | 300 | 100 |
| June 2005 | 142,100 | 7,600 | 600 | 300 |
| June 2006 | 135,000 | 7,600 | 500 | 200 |
| June 2007 | 88,900 | 6,100 | 400 | 200 |
| June 2008 | 62,700 | 4,800 | 300 | 100 |
| '—' Indicates a figure less than 50. | ||||
| Notes: | ||||
| 1. Figures include all uncleared applications over six months old. | ||||
| 2. As the current scheme came into existence in 2003, figures only go back to this date. | ||||
| 3. Cases have been allocated to the North East region, Jarrow Parliamentary Constituency and South Tyneside Local Authority by matching the postcode of the parent with care against the Office for National Statistics postcode directory. | ||||
| 4. Many uncleared applications will not have reached the point where the address details of the non-resident parent or parent with care have been recorded on the CS2 or CSCS computer systems and so can not be allocated to a geographical area. Such applications have been included under the Great Britain figure but are excluded from the regional breakdowns. Approximately 5,600 applications (9 per cent. of all uncleared applications) over six months old fall into this category. | ||||
| 5. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 100. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in how many cases of child support administration the computer system has been incapable of producing a result and the case transferred to manual management in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in how many cases of child support administration the computer system has been incapable of producing a result and the case transferred to manual management in each of the last three years.