Skip to main content

1-7 of 7 results for answeredby:"Lord Bradshaw"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I think the Minister will be aware that any softening of the Government’s attitude towards the expansion of Heathrow will be met with a cry of dismay from the north and the regions as a signal of the Government’s abandonment of the levelling-up agenda. This is a London project driven by London and foreign interests. I urge the Government not to let it happen.

Answered by
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 December 2020
Reference
808 c1736
House
House of Lords

Crossrail Bill. Carry over motion to suspend further proceedings on the Bill, if presented, until the next Session of Parliament and that Standing Orders applicable to the Bill, complied or dispensed with so far in this Session, shall be deemed to be so in the next Session. Agreed to on...

Lead member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
7 April 2005
Reference
671 c887-9
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on motor vehicles (international circulation) (amendment). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
12 July 2004
Reference
663 c1089-92
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on Stansted airport aircraft movement limit (revocation). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
12 July 2004
Reference
663 c1086-9
House
House of Lords

Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) (Temporary Use in Great Britain) (Amendment) Regulations (SI 2004/462). Lords debate on a motion that an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that the Order be annulled. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
24 March 2004
Reference
659 c786-94
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the future of London Underground. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Peyton of Yeovil
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
14 November 2001
Reference
628 c569-77,592-618
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the current and long term problems of the railway industry. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Marsh
Answering member
Lord Bradshaw
Department
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
31 October 2001
Reference
627 c1420-90
House
House of Lords