1-20 of 305 results for answeredby:"Lord Lemos"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.33 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- answeredby:"Lord Lemos"
- We searched for
- answeringMember_ses:553788 OR answeringDept_ses:553788 OR askedToReplyAuthor_ses:553788
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Lemos on 15 September (HL2861), what the cost to the taxpayer of holding foreign national offenders in prisons was in (1) 2025, and (2) 2026 to date.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Lemos on 15 September (HL2861), what the cost to the taxpayer of holding foreign national offenders in prisons was in (1) 2025, and (2) 2026 to date.
It is not possible to disaggregate prison running costs by nationality. Cost per prisoner depends on the category of prison.
The latest costs per prisoner, by individual prison, are published by H M Prison & Probation Service as part of its Annual Report and Accounts 2024–25 Management Information Addendum. Data on the number of Foreign National Offenders (FNOs) in custody are published in the Offender management statistics quarterly under the prison population table 1_Q_9.
Within its first two years (July 2024 to June 2026), this Government has increased returns of FNOs by 41% compared to the last two years of the previous Government.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Lemos on 27 July (HL2715), how many exemptions were granted under the previous Government to permit a transgender woman who retained male genitalia, or who had been charged with or convicted of a sexual or violent offence, to be...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Lemos on 27 July (HL2715), how many exemptions were granted under the previous Government to permit a transgender woman who retained male genitalia, or who had been charged with or convicted of a sexual or violent offence, to be...
The number of ministerial exemptions provided to transgender women since the exemption process was introduced in February 2023 is shown in the table below. For data protection reasons, the exact figure is not given where the total is five or fewer.
Year | Number of exemptions provided |
2023 | 9 |
2024 – 1 Jan – 4 Jul | Five or fewer |
2024 – 5 Jul – 31 Dec | 0 |
2025 | 0 |
2026 to date | 0 |
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risk of individuals looking for reputable lawyers being directed by AI chatbots to solicitors' firms which have been sanctioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the risk of individuals looking for reputable lawyers being directed by AI chatbots to solicitors' firms which have been sanctioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
The Government recognises that the increased use of AI to identify legal services providers presents both opportunities and risks for consumers, including the possibility of inaccurate or outdated information being provided. It is crucial to ensure that consumers can access reliable information when choosing legal services.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority, as the independent regulator of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales, is responsible for setting and enforcing professional standards and protecting consumers of legal services. The SRA assists consumers in making informed decisions about legal services. It publishes a wide range of regulatory and disciplinary decisions through its website and Solicitors Register.
Whilst the Government has not undertaken a specific assessment of this risk, we continue to work closely with the SRA and other legal services regulators to better understand the implications of AI for the legal services sector and ensure that appropriate consumer protections remain in place. The Ministry of Justice intends to raise this issue with the SRA as part of this ongoing engagement.
To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the cost of reforming the judicial review process for nationally significant infrastructure projects; and how much time they anticipate will be saved, on average, as a result of these measures.
To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the cost of reforming the judicial review process for nationally significant infrastructure projects; and how much time they anticipate will be saved, on average, as a result of these measures.
Since 2025, the Government has introduced several reforms to judicial reviews of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) to speed up the determination of such claims and prevent meritless claims from causing unnecessary delays. On 1 October 2025, amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Directions formally designated NSIP judicial reviews as Significant Planning Court Claims; removed the paper permission stage, encouraged the use of case management conferences; and introduced target timescales for NSIP cases in the Court of Appeal. In February 2026, the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 also limited claims deemed totally without merit to a single permission hearing by removing the right to appeal to the higher courts. Further target timescales for NSIP cases in the High Court came into force on 1 October 2026. These changes support faster and more consistent handling of NSIP judicial reviews, providing greater certainty for developers and supporting the Government's growth agenda.
There are no significant costs associated with these reforms.The reforms are instead expected to lower costs for developers and other parties.
The package of reforms is expected to make the judicial review process for NSIPs up to six months faster, compared with the average duration of approximately 16 months identified in Lord Banner's Independent Review.
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the publication of the National Audit Office's report on electronic monitoring on 10 July, what steps they are taking to reduce the forecast shortfall of 1,500 full-time equivalent probation staff by September 2026; and what assessment they have made of the risk...
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the publication of the National Audit Office's report on electronic monitoring on 10 July, what steps they are taking to reduce the forecast shortfall of 1,500 full-time equivalent probation staff by September 2026; and what assessment they have made of the risk...
This financial year, we have committed ourselves to recruiting 1,300 additional probation officers, to add to over 2,300 we recruited in the last two years, to help monitor offenders and keep the public safe.
Under the progression model, prison leavers will face the toughest supervision ever available, with record levels of tagging, world-first restriction zones to confine offenders to specific areas, and bans on attending public events, public houses and clubs.
Progression model releases are happening in a controlled and orderly way to ensure public protection.
To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of prisoners in each ethnic group were subject to a disciplinary adjudication in the most recent year for which figures are available.
To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of prisoners in each ethnic group were subject to a disciplinary adjudication in the most recent year for which figures are available.
The Adjudications Policy Framework must operate in accordance with the Equality Act 2010 and seek to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation.
The information on the proportion of prisoners in each ethnic group who were subject to an adjudication is not centrally held. Providing a robust and meaningful assessment of the distribution of adjudications across ethnic groups among all prisoners held during this period would require development of new analysis across multiple datasets and the information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
However, regular statistics are published on adjudication outcomes, broken down by ethnicity, in our quarterly Offender Management Statistics. These figures relate to the number of adjudication outcomes, rather than the number of individual prisoners who received an adjudication: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/offender-management-statistics-quarterly. Information on the representation of different ethnic groups within the prison population is also regularly published within this release, for context to these statistics.
To ask His Majesty's Government what information they hold on whether prison adjudication procedures and penalties are used differentially for prisoners from different ethnic groups; and what assessment they have made of any disparities identified.
To ask His Majesty's Government what information they hold on whether prison adjudication procedures and penalties are used differentially for prisoners from different ethnic groups; and what assessment they have made of any disparities identified.
The Adjudications Policy Framework must operate in accordance with the Equality Act 2010 and seek to eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation.
The information on the proportion of prisoners in each ethnic group who were subject to an adjudication is not centrally held. Providing a robust and meaningful assessment of the distribution of adjudications across ethnic groups among all prisoners held during this period would require development of new analysis across multiple datasets and the information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
However, regular statistics are published on adjudication outcomes, broken down by ethnicity, in our quarterly Offender Management Statistics. These figures relate to the number of adjudication outcomes, rather than the number of individual prisoners who received an adjudication: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/offender-management-statistics-quarterly. Information on the representation of different ethnic groups within the prison population is also regularly published within this release, for context to these statistics.
To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect the Health and Safety Executive's Crown Censure proceedings concerning radon exposure at HMP Dartmoor to conclude; and what assessment they have made of those proceedings and any recommendations arising from them to date.
To ask His Majesty's Government when they expect the Health and Safety Executive's Crown Censure proceedings concerning radon exposure at HMP Dartmoor to conclude; and what assessment they have made of those proceedings and any recommendations arising from them to date.
The health and safety of prisoners and staff is our first priority. Since 2022, extensive efforts have been made to assess occurrence of radon in the prison estate, and to implement any mitigation measures identified as necessary following investigations conducted under the Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017.
The Health & Safety Executive announced its intention to initiate Crown Censure proceedings in May this year. As those proceedings have yet to conclude, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the health implications of historic radon exposure for former prisoners and staff at HMP Dartmoor; and whether they plan to publish that assessment.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the health implications of historic radon exposure for former prisoners and staff at HMP Dartmoor; and whether they plan to publish that assessment.
The health and safety of prisoners and staff is our first priority. Since 2022, extensive efforts have been made to assess occurrence of radon in the prison estate, and to implement any mitigation measures identified as necessary following investigations conducted under the Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017.
The Health & Safety Executive announced its intention to initiate Crown Censure proceedings in May this year. As those proceedings have yet to conclude, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.
I am happy to ask the Home Office again; it is not my department, but I speak for the Government. However, my view remains, in relation to putting out data that is misleading or unreliable—I am sorry, but hollow laughter does not help to get to the truth—this is a difficult enough debate in the public square without misleading information.
I am happy to ask the Home Office again; it is not my department, but I speak for the Government. However, my view remains, in relation to putting out data that is misleading or unreliable—I am sorry, but hollow laughter does not help to get to the truth—this is a difficult enough debate in the public square without misleading information.
My Lords, within our first two years this Government increased returns of foreign national offenders by 41% compared to the last two years of the previous Government. Between 1 August 2025 and 31 July 2026, more than 3,000 foreign offenders were removed directly from prison under the early removal scheme. Next year, new powers will enable some determinate-sentence foreign national offenders to be deported immediately after sentencing, and we have established a cross-government taskforce to maximise removals.
My Lords, within our first two years this Government increased returns of foreign national offenders by 41% compared to the last two years of the previous Government. Between 1 August 2025 and 31 July 2026, more than 3,000 foreign offenders were removed directly from prison under the early removal scheme. Next year, new powers will enable some determinate-sentence foreign national offenders to be deported immediately after sentencing, and we have established a cross-government taskforce to maximise removals.
My Lords, the information that the noble Baroness refers to is held by the Home Office but is not in a reportable format for data extraction purposes. The UK is committed to its human rights obligations at home and abroad, including the European Convention on Human Rights. However, that commitment does not mean complacency. The Chiinău declaration, adopted in May, recognises that the ECHR must not unnecessarily constrain the ability of sovereign states to expel serious criminals, and the Government are also legislating in the Immigration and Asylum Bill currently before the other place.
My Lords, the information that the noble Baroness refers to is held by the Home Office but is not in a reportable format for data extraction purposes. The UK is committed to its human rights obligations at home and abroad, including the European Convention on Human Rights. However, that commitment does not mean complacency. The Chiinău declaration, adopted in May, recognises that the ECHR must not unnecessarily constrain the ability of sovereign states to expel serious criminals, and the Government are also legislating in the Immigration and Asylum Bill currently before the other place.
I thank the noble Baroness for that question. It is an excellent summary of the approach we are taking. HMPPS has a very substantial budget, and we have been working on advancing the deportation of foreign national offenders for many years. The fact is that it has not come down as a proportion. That is why the noble Baroness is right that we need to speed the process up, and that is why we are legislating. We shall of course seek to find the resources to do that.
I thank the noble Baroness for that question. It is an excellent summary of the approach we are taking. HMPPS has a very substantial budget, and we have been working on advancing the deportation of foreign national offenders for many years. The fact is that it has not come down as a proportion. That is why the noble Baroness is right that we need to speed the process up, and that is why we are legislating. We shall of course seek to find the resources to do that.
Our position on this is that we will use prisoner transfer agreements where they exist and with those countries where we can make such agreements. However, as the noble and learned Lord knows, they are not an easy or quick route. Our commitment is therefore that we will deport foreign national offenders as soon as they have been sentenced. We introduced that in the Sentencing Act and we will commence it in the New Year. We are very serious about this. Of course we will work with our bilateral partners internationally, but it is our commitment that where foreigners commit offences, except for very serious offences, they will be deported.
Our position on this is that we will use prisoner transfer agreements where they exist and with those countries where we can make such agreements. However, as the noble and learned Lord knows, they are not an easy or quick route. Our commitment is therefore that we will deport foreign national offenders as soon as they have been sentenced. We introduced that in the Sentencing Act and we will commence it in the New Year. We are very serious about this. Of course we will work with our bilateral partners internationally, but it is our commitment that where foreigners commit offences, except for very serious offences, they will be deported.
I have already said in response to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Garnier, that our policy is that we intend to deport people who are foreign national offenders. It is not a question of whether countries will accept them. Our intention is to deport them. I have already explained the difficulties with prisoner transfer agreements. By all means we can explore these other routes, but the policy will remain that, if foreign national offenders commit offences in this country then our intention is to deport them, except in the case of very serious offences.
I have already said in response to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Garnier, that our policy is that we intend to deport people who are foreign national offenders. It is not a question of whether countries will accept them. Our intention is to deport them. I have already explained the difficulties with prisoner transfer agreements. By all means we can explore these other routes, but the policy will remain that, if foreign national offenders commit offences in this country then our intention is to deport them, except in the case of very serious offences.
With respect, no, I do not agree with that comment from my noble friend. Of course people who commit offences in this country should be punished, and that is our intention, but, as I have said,
we intend to deport people. I do not regard that as a travesty of justice. Being deported from this country and not being allowed to return is a punishment in itself, and that is what we shall do.
With respect, no, I do not agree with that comment from my noble friend. Of course people who commit offences in this country should be punished, and that is our intention, but, as I have said,
we intend to deport people. I do not regard that as a travesty of justice. Being deported from this country and not being allowed to return is a punishment in itself, and that is what we shall do.
We will, of course, discuss with the Home Office and across government how we can make sure, in the interests of transparency and in the interest, if I may say so, of a well-informed public debate, that we get the information out there, but, as I have said, we are not going to put out information that is not in a reportable format. I will go back and ask again, but I doubt that the position is going to change.
On the ECHR, I realise now that if you aspire to power in the Tory party then you have to advertise your commitment to getting rid of that convention. That is not this Government’s policy. We are committed to the ECHR.
We will, of course, discuss with the Home Office and across government how we can make sure, in the interests of transparency and in the interest, if I may say so, of a well-informed public debate, that we get the information out there, but, as I have said, we are not going to put out information that is not in a reportable format. I will go back and ask again, but I doubt that the position is going to change.
On the ECHR, I realise now that if you aspire to power in the Tory party then you have to advertise your commitment to getting rid of that convention. That is not this Government’s policy. We are committed to the ECHR.
It is precisely with that in mind that my right honourable friend the Home Secretary is clarifying this in the Immigration and Asylum Bill, so that we can put in place a public interest test to ensure that we can make the right arrangements for these deportations, including respect for their rights under the ECHR.
It is precisely with that in mind that my right honourable friend the Home Secretary is clarifying this in the Immigration and Asylum Bill, so that we can put in place a public interest test to ensure that we can make the right arrangements for these deportations, including respect for their rights under the ECHR.
It is fair to say that the previous Government did not release this data either.
It is fair to say that the previous Government did not release this data either.
I am very happy to elaborate on that; I do believe it in my heart of hearts. I also believe in the political declaration from 46 member countries of the Council of Europe which recognised, in the political declaration from the Chiinău meeting—a good word, which I enjoy using from the Dispatch Box—that the ECHR must not unnecessarily constrain the ability of sovereign states to protect their borders or expel serious criminals, and that the threshold for Article 3 in relation to “inhuman or degrading treatment” must remain high and constant. This Government feel that they have done a lot to put that on the agenda of the Council of Europe, and we have received a lot of support for it. So, yes, I do feel optimistic about it.
I am very happy to elaborate on that; I do believe it in my heart of hearts. I also believe in the political declaration from 46 member countries of the Council of Europe which recognised, in the political declaration from the Chiinău meeting—a good word, which I enjoy using from the Dispatch Box—that the ECHR must not unnecessarily constrain the ability of sovereign states to protect their borders or expel serious criminals, and that the threshold for Article 3 in relation to “inhuman or degrading treatment” must remain high and constant. This Government feel that they have done a lot to put that on the agenda of the Council of Europe, and we have received a lot of support for it. So, yes, I do feel optimistic about it.