1-20 of 2,909 results for answeredby:"Nick Harvey"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.277 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- answeredby:"Nick Harvey"
- We searched for
- answeringMember_ses:301096 OR answeringDept_ses:301096 OR askedToReplyAuthor_ses:301096
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the annual cost is of the British military bases in (a) Canada, (b) Cyprus, (c) the Falkland Islands, (d) Germany, (e) Gibraltar and (f) Ascension Island, in each category of expenditure.
[114545]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the annual cost is of the British military bases in (a) Canada, (b) Cyprus, (c) the Falkland Islands, (d) Germany, (e) Gibraltar and (f) Ascension Island, in each category of expenditure.
[114545]
The information is taking time to collate. I will write to the hon. Member as soon as it is available.
Substantive answer from Andrew Robathan to Angus Robertson:
Further to the letter my predecessor, Sir Nick Harvey MP, sent to you on 17 August 2012 in answer to your parliamentary question of 17 July 2012 (Official Report, column 762W) about military bases, I am afraid that one of the figures quoted was inaccurate. The figure for the "Spend by Lead Front Line Command" for the South Atlantic Islands should have read £64 million, not £61 million.
Please accept my apologies for this error which I have corrected in the following table, reproduced with its original explanatory notes.
| £
million | ||||
| 2011-12 | Cyprus | South
Atlantic
Islands | Germany | Gibraltar |
| Spend
by Lead Front Line
Command | 157 | 64 | 816 | 58 |
| Defence
Infrastructure Organisation
Expenditure | 100 | 35 | *91 | 13 |
| Notes: 1. The figure for DIO spending in Germany includes £1.5 million of expenditure on the European Support Group, which funds projects in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Norway. 2. This is the first time the Defence Infrastructure Organisation expenditure for Cyprus, the South Atlantic Islands (covering the Falkland Islands and Ascension Island), Germany, and Gibraltar spending has been separately identified in this manner. 3. The Falklands cost presented here is the cost of running and maintaining the military base there—not the total cost of defending the Falklands. |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral question from the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North of 5 July 2012, Official Report, column 1097, what the annual recruitment to the 3rd Battalion the Mercian Regiment (the Staffords) has been since 2007; and what modelling was undertaken...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral question from the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North of 5 July 2012, Official Report, column 1097, what the annual recruitment to the 3rd Battalion the Mercian Regiment (the Staffords) has been since 2007; and what modelling was undertaken...
[holding answer 17 July 2012]: The Army sets recruitment targets at regimental level. Recruits are then allocated to the battalion within their chosen regiment where the demand is greatest. Priority is given to battalions preparing for operations.
The following table shows the overall manning position at April of each year of The Mercian Regiment—including establishment and recruiting performance since 2007 (figures for 2007 are not available centrally):
| Mercian
Regiment | |||||
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Establishment | 1,667 | 1,647 | 1,676 | 1,671 | 1,664 |
| Strength | 1,384 | 1,453 | 1,552 | 1,498 | 1,440 |
| +/- | -283 | -194 | -124 | -173 | -224 |
| Recruiting
Tgt | 483 | 513 | 395 | 270 | 432 |
| Actual | 386 | 456 | 381 | 266 | 439 |
| +/- | -97 | -57 | -14 | -4 | 7 |
The recruitment target figures for 2010-11 are artificially low due to a nine-month pause in infantry training. This affected regiments differently depending on where their training slots were on the Infantry Training Centre programme during that year.
The following table shows the manning levels of the 3rd Battalion The Mercian Regiment, complete with establishment and strength as at April of each year.
| 3rd
Btn Mercian
Regt | ||||||||||
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Establishment | 545 | 545 | 586 | 608 | 608 | 576 | 576 | 605 | 605 | 604 |
| Strength | 516 | 538 | 527 | 458 | 470 | 501 | 511 | 555 | 560 | 507 |
| +/- | -29 | -7 | -59 | -150 | -138 | -75 | -65 | -50 | -45 | -97 |
To determine which five battalions to remove from the infantry order of battle as part of the wider Army 2020 structure, the Army applied a number of criteria, which were:
maintaining a regimental system which is largely regionally aligned; demographic sustainability of regiments according to projected regional supply of recruits;
proportionality of outcome, with no cap badge deletions and no regiment losing more than one battalion in a re-organisation;
balancing the whole infantry structure to maintain variety of roles and parity of opportunity of experience for officers and soldiers;
taking account of previous decisions on mergers and deletions;
historical manning performance; and
ensuring a solution that the Army would see as fair and equitable.
Based on demographic data available from the Office of National Statistics for the age cohort across the UK from which infantry recruits are drawn—and historical trends in terms of the percentage of that cohort likely to join the Army—an assessment was made of which regiments were likely to be the least sustainable in the future if they retained their current structure. This work also included a comparison of each regiment's historical outflow so the likely recruiting requirement could be determined. This showed that the Mercian Regiment were one of the regiments from whom a battalion would need to be removed if it were to be sustainable in manning terms by 2020. Selection of which battalion should be withdrawn was based largely on the fact that while the 1st and 2nd Battalions are already based in the UK, the 3rd Battalion would need to be returned from Germany incurring the cost of new barracks, which we are attempting to minimise where possible.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 451, on Olympics: security, whether armed forces personnel will be able to opt out of serving as security for the London 2012 Olympics.
[118099]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 451, on Olympics: security, whether armed forces personnel will be able to opt out of serving as security for the London 2012 Olympics.
[118099]
Service personnel will not be able to opt out of serving as security for the London 2012 Olympics.
However, as the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), stated to the House on 12 July 2012, Official Report, columns 42-43WS, all those taking part in security for the Olympics will receive their full leave entitlement even if it has to be rescheduled, that no one is out of pocket due to cancelled personal arrangements and that all deployed personnel are appropriately supported.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 451, on Olympics: security, whether any compensation will be given to the families of armed forces personnel for the cancellation of the service member's post-operational tour leave.
[118100]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the oral answer of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 451, on Olympics: security, whether any compensation will be given to the families of armed forces personnel for the cancellation of the service member's post-operational tour leave.
[118100]
There is no requirement for members of the armed forces to have their post operational tour leave (POTL) cancelled because of the requirement for additional service personnel to provide security at the Olympics. As an example, the additional 3,500 troops employed for venue security force are coming from formed units that returned from operations in April 2012—so POTL should have already been taken.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish the demographic analysis used to determine the selection of infantry battalions to be withdrawn from the Order of Battle as part of the Army 2020 review.
[116597]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish the demographic analysis used to determine the selection of infantry battalions to be withdrawn from the Order of Battle as part of the Army 2020 review.
[116597]
[holding answer 12 July 2012]: Against a backdrop of needing to remove five battalions from the infantry order of battle as part of the wider Army 2020 structure, a number of criteria were applied by the Army which were: maintaining a regimental system which is largely regionally aligned; demographic sustainability of regiments according to projected regional supply of recruits; proportionality of outcome, with no cap badge deletions and no regiment losing more than one battalion in a re-organisation; balancing the whole infantry structure to maintain variety of roles and parity of opportunity of experience for officers and soldiers; taking account of previous decisions on mergers and deletions; historical manning performance; and ensuring a solution that the Army would see as fair and equitable.
Based on demographic data available from the Office of National Statistics for the age cohort across the UK from which infantry recruits are drawn, and historical trends in terms of the percentage of that cohort likely to join the Army, an assessment was made of which regiments were likely to be the least sustainable in the future if they retained their current structure. This work also included a comparison of each regiment's historical outflow so the likely recruiting requirement could be determined.
The analysis showed that those regiments likely to be the least sustainable in future were the Royal Regiment of Scotland (predicted to be 1.75 battalions short), The Yorkshire Regiment (predicted to be 0.8 battalions short), The Mercian Regiment (predicted to be 0.56 battalions short) and the Royal Welsh Regiment (predicted to be 0.55 battalions short). It was therefore decided to remove one battalion from each of those regiments.
After the removal of four battalions, the method for predicting future sustainability became less statistically discerning. Therefore to determine the fifth battalion to be removed from the order of battle required the application of criteria that went wider than demographics. Historical manning performance and the need to maintain equity of opportunity meant that the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers (with average historical undermanning of 13.3% since the previous reorganisation of the infantry in 2007, and being a regiment with two battalions) was the next appropriate regiment from which to withdraw a battalion.
The analysis showed that after the withdrawal of five battalions from across the infantry, future manning should be sustainable with sufficient recruits predicted to fill the necessary posts across all battalions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the established unit strength will be (1) of (a) 3rd Battalion, The Rifles Regiment, (b) 2nd Battalion, The Rifles Regiment, (c) 2nd Battalion, The Mercian Regiment, (d) 3rd Battalion, The Royal Regiment of Scotland, (e) 4th Battalion, The Royal Regiment of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the established unit strength will be (1) of (a) 3rd Battalion, The Rifles Regiment, (b) 2nd Battalion, The Rifles Regiment, (c) 2nd Battalion, The Mercian Regiment, (d) 3rd Battalion, The Royal Regiment of Scotland, (e) 4th Battalion, The Royal Regiment of...
In the future Army Structure outlined under Army 2020, the allocation of roles to individual Infantry Battalions and Royal Armoured Corps Regiments is yet to be decided. It is therefore too early to provide the established strength of each of the units listed in the question.
However, when allocated, total unit strengths based on their specific role are expected to be as in the following table:
| Unit
role | Unit
strength |
| Armoured
Infantry | 729 |
| Armoured
(Heavy) Protected Mobility
Infantry | 709 |
| Light
Protected Mobility
Infantry | 581 |
| Light
Role
Infantry | 561 |
| Royal
Gurkha
Rifles | 567 |
| Parachute
Regiment | 660 |
| T56
Armoured
Regiment | 587 |
| Armoured
Cavalry
Regiment | 528 |
| Light
Cavalry
Regiment | 404 |
| Household
Cavalry Mounted
Regiment | 341 |
The exact establishments of the London Based Public Duties Incremental Company (PDIC) and Scottish based PDIC remain under review although current planning figures are around 90 and 140 personnel respectively.
All unit strengths include other arms attached to the units such as Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, Royal Army Medical Corps, Adjutant General Corps (Staff and Personnel Support), Royal Logistic Corps, Royal Army Physical Training Corps and Royal Army Chaplains Department personnel.
(2) of (a) 1st Battalion, The Coldstream Guards, (b) 2nd Battalion, The Tigers, The Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment, (c) The Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment, (d) the public duties companies of the Brigade of Guards, (e) 2nd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment, (f) 3rd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment, (g) Argyll and...
(2) of (a) 1st Battalion, The Coldstream Guards, (b) 2nd Battalion, The Tigers, The Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment, (c) The Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment, (d) the public duties companies of the Brigade of Guards, (e) 2nd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment, (f) 3rd Battalion, The Parachute Regiment, (g) Argyll and...
In the future Army Structure outlined under Army 2020, the allocation of roles to individual Infantry Battalions and Royal Armoured Corps Regiments is yet to be decided. It is therefore too early to provide the established strength of each of the units listed in the question.
However, when allocated, total unit strengths based on their specific role are expected to be as in the following table:
| Unit
role | Unit
strength |
| Armoured
Infantry | 729 |
| Armoured
(Heavy) Protected Mobility
Infantry | 709 |
| Light
Protected Mobility
Infantry | 581 |
| Light
Role
Infantry | 561 |
| Royal
Gurkha
Rifles | 567 |
| Parachute
Regiment | 660 |
| T56
Armoured
Regiment | 587 |
| Armoured
Cavalry
Regiment | 528 |
| Light
Cavalry
Regiment | 404 |
| Household
Cavalry Mounted
Regiment | 341 |
The exact establishments of the London Based Public Duties Incremental Company (PDIC) and Scottish based PDIC remain under review although current planning figures are around 90 and 140 personnel respectively.
All unit strengths include other arms attached to the units such as Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, Royal Army Medical Corps, Adjutant General Corps (Staff and Personnel Support), Royal Logistic Corps, Royal Army Physical Training Corps and Royal Army Chaplains Department personnel.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many multi-role brigades the Army will have by 2020.
[116931]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many multi-role brigades the Army will have by 2020.
[116931]
I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), on 5 July 2012, Official Report, column 1085, in which he said that a future structure for the Army based on reaction forces, comprising 16 Air Assault Brigade and three armoured infantry brigades, adaptable forces, comprising seven infantry brigades of varying size and force troops.
Between them these will be able to generate the same operational output as five multi-role brigades but in a more flexible way.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many people are employed in each of the 17 major units affected by the Army 2020 review.
[117080]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many people are employed in each of the 17 major units affected by the Army 2020 review.
[117080]
[holding answer 13 July 2012]: I refer the right hon. Member to the Statement made by the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), on 5 July 2012, Official Report, columns 1087-88, in which he announced changes to a number of units that will be withdrawn, amalgamated or merged resulting in the reduction overall of 17 units.
The following table shows the total number of regular Army personnel, both officers and soldiers, employed within each of the units affected:
| Establishment | Total
Regular Army personnel
employed |
| 9th/12th
Lancers | 371 |
| Queens
Royal
Lancers | 485 |
| 1st
Royal Tank
Regiment | 351 |
| 2nd
Royal Tank
Regiment | 526 |
| 39
Regiment Royal
Artillery | 581 |
| 24
Commando Engineer
Regiment | 369 |
| 28
Engineer
Regiment | 536 |
| 67
Works Group Royal
Engineers | 58 |
| 5th
Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland (5
SCOTS) | 582 |
| 2nd
Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
(2RRF) | 619 |
| 2nd
Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment (2
YORKS) | 588 |
| 3rd
Battalion The Mercian Regiment (3
MERCIAN) | 630 |
| 2nd
Battalion The Royal Welsh (2 R
WELSH) | 762 |
| 1
Regiment Army Air
Corps | 336 |
| 9
Regiment Army Air
Corps | 450 |
| 1
Logistic Support Regiment Royal Logistic
Corps | 536 |
| 2
Logistic Support Regiment Royal Logistic
Corps | 508 |
| 23
Pioneer Regiment Royal Logistic
Corps | 556 |
| 101
Force Support Battalion Royal Electrical and Mechanical
Engineers | 235 |
| 5th
Regiment Royal Military
Police | 200 |
These figures comprise all regular Army personnel under the command of the unit's commanding officer and therefore include Army personnel from other arms and corps employed at the unit.
An individual in a unit which is being withdrawn or merged is no more or less likely than any other individual with similar skills and service record to be selected for future redundancy. When units are withdrawn from the Army's order of battle their personnel will be reassigned to other units, where possible within the same regiment.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to page 24 of his Department's publication, Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review, published in October 2010, when he plans that the five multi-role brigades will be established.
[118073]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to page 24 of his Department's publication, Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review, published in October 2010, when he plans that the five multi-role brigades will be established.
[118073]
The Army 2020 proposition offers the best solution for a combined force of 120,000 regular and reservist soldiers. It will deliver three armoured infantry brigades in the Reactive Force and seven brigades in the Adaptive Force. This force structure will be multi-role in nature and will deliver the same Defence outputs as the Army force structure envisaged in the 2010 strategic defence and security review.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place a copy of the review into the legality of CHARM3 depleted uranium ammunition required by Article 36 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention in the Library.
[118211]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place a copy of the review into the legality of CHARM3 depleted uranium ammunition required by Article 36 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention in the Library.
[118211]
The CHARM3 legal weapons review is being withheld to protect legal professional privilege, the policy-making process and relations between the United Kingdom and other states.
The review conclusion, that CHARM3 was capable of being used lawfully by UK armed forces in international armed conflict and the rationale behind it, was laid before the House in a written ministerial statement on 12 July 2012, Official Report, columns 40-41WS.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many soldiers from 5 SCOTS took part in Exercise Gaulish Hackle; and at what estimated cost to the public purse.
[116875]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many soldiers from 5 SCOTS took part in Exercise Gaulish Hackle; and at what estimated cost to the public purse.
[116875]
Exercise Gaulish Hackle involved two companies from 5 SCOTS in an urban training exercise at facilities in France. The exercise took place in two phases. Each phase involved 148 personnel, making a total of 296 and was part of the planned training required by the companies in their current role as part of the lead battle group for the Airborne Task Force within 16 Air Assault Brigade.
The exercise is part of a reciprocal exchange activity with the French. The estimated cost to the public purse was approximately £17,900 overall, expended on the transport of 5 SCOTS to and from France. The cost of the services provided by the French is unknown, but included items such as accommodation and food.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what duties the additional armed forces personnel to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will undertake;
[117554]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what duties the additional armed forces personnel to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will undertake;
[117554]
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(2) where the additional armed forces to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will be accommodated during the Games;
[117555]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(2) where the additional armed forces to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will be accommodated during the Games;
[117555]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(3) from what deployments the additional armed forces personnel to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will be removed;
[117556]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(3) from what deployments the additional armed forces personnel to be covering London 2012 Olympics security will be removed;
[117556]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(4) which department requested the use of additional armed forces personnel to cover London 2012 Olympics security;
[117557]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(4) which department requested the use of additional armed forces personnel to cover London 2012 Olympics security;
[117557]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(5) which Minister in his Department took the decision to use additional armed forces personnel to cover London 2012 Olympics security;
[117558]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(5) which Minister in his Department took the decision to use additional armed forces personnel to cover London 2012 Olympics security;
[117558]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(6) from which units the additional armed forces personnel being deployed to cover Olympic security will be drawn;
[117565]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(6) from which units the additional armed forces personnel being deployed to cover Olympic security will be drawn;
[117565]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(7) what the cost to the public purse of deploying the additional armed forces personnel to cover Olympic security will be;
[117566]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(7) what the cost to the public purse of deploying the additional armed forces personnel to cover Olympic security will be;
[117566]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.
(8) from which budget the costs of the recent deployment of additional armed forces personnel to cover Olympic security will be met.
[117567]
Mr Kevan Jones:
(8) from which budget the costs of the recent deployment of additional armed forces personnel to cover Olympic security will be met.
[117567]
Mr Kevan Jones:
[holding answer 16 July 2012]: As the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), confirmed in his written statement of 12 July 2012, Official Report, column 43WS, he agreed with the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs May), and the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, the right hon. Member for South West Surrey (Mr Hunt), to deploy a further 3,500 military personnel to support venue security operations. On 24 July 2012 it was also agreed that a further 1,200 troops were to be deployed to provide resilience and flexibility in this capacity.
These personnel are conducting a number of important roles helping to secure the world's largest sporting event. These tasks include vehicle screening, pedestrian screening and perimeter security tasks which sit alongside niche military capabilities being provided by other personnel provided to the wider Olympic security effort. The precise costs of this additional deployment are currently being scoped—the House will be informed in due course. These costs will not be drawn from the Ministry of Defence (MOD)'s budget. In due course the MOD will provide the Home Office with details of the costs for reimbursement.
I can confirm that none of the units used for this task, announced on the 12 and 24 July 2012 respectively, were removed from deployments on military operations. Personnel were drawn from the following units:
The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (5th Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland)
3rd Battalion The Parachute Regiment
7th Regiment Royal Horse Artillery
13 Air Assault Support Regiment
23 Royal Regiment Engineers
Composite Units to include: 13 Medical Regiment, 216 Signals Squadron and 156 Provost Company RMP
1 The Princess of Wales Royal Regiment
5th Battalion The Rifles
35 Regiment Royal Engineer
28 Engineer regiment
1 (UK) Armoured Division Signal Regiment
Queen Dragoon Guards
Queens Royal Hussars
26th Regiment Royal Artillery
1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers
4th Battalion The Rifles
Household Cavalry Regiment
1st Battalion The Rifles
30 Commando Royal Marines
42 Commando Royal Marines
45 Commando Royal Marines
Commando Logistic Regiment
24 Commando Engineer Regiment
3 Force Protection Wing RAF Regiment
Queens Colour Squadron RAF Regiment
Military personnel supporting Olympic safety and security are accommodated in a range of Defence and commercial sites. Since the announcement on 12 July 2012 additional accommodation was secured at Tobacco Dock (Wapping) to accommodate the majority of these additional personnel.