1-20 of 156,066 results for answeredby:Treasury
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.477 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.115 seconds
- Search query
- answeredby:Treasury
- We searched for
- answeringMember_ses:84102 OR answeringDept_ses:84102 OR askedToReplyAuthor_ses:84102
Type
House
Session
More
Year
More
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the findings of the BiGGAR Economics report, published in April, that the revenue raised from VAT on independent school fees in Scotland will be outweighed by the fiscal impact of reduced pupil numbers, resulting in a net loss of...
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the findings of the BiGGAR Economics report, published in April, that the revenue raised from VAT on independent school fees in Scotland will be outweighed by the fiscal impact of reduced pupil numbers, resulting in a net loss of...
The Government conducted thorough and detailed analysis of the impacts of removing the VAT exemption and published a Tax Impact and Information Note (TIIN) which sets out this analysis. This is a comprehensive assessment of the impacts on individuals and families, businesses and the wider economy, as well as equalities impacts. It was published online and can be found here: www.gov.uk/government/publications/vat-on-private-school-fees/ac8c20ce-4824-462d-b206-26a567724643
At Autumn Budget 2024 the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) confirmed this change will raise over £1.7 billion per year by 2029/30. Since the exemption was removed in January last year, the OBR has estimated it will raise around £40 million per year more than originally forecast.
The Government always expected that applying VAT to private school fees would, in the long-term, lead to 37,000 fewer pupils in the private sector and 35,000 additional pupils in the state sector – less than 0.5 per cent of the state school population. The Government’s analysis shows these additional pupils will cost £270m per year, compared to over £1.7bn raised in revenue. As noted in the TIIN, the overall impact in Scotland will likely be smaller than in England as it has a lower proportion of pupils in private schools, though there will be regional variation.
The fall in private school pupil numbers since the policy came into effect is in line with expectations and reflects demographic change across the whole school system, not the VAT policy alone. Pupil numbers have fallen across primary, secondary, and independent schools alike. This is primarily driven by falling birth rates, following a peak in 2012, as cohorts move through secondary school age and smaller year groups enter primary.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of proposals for a new choir tax relief ahead of the forthcoming Budget.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of proposals for a new choir tax relief ahead of the forthcoming Budget.
The Government recognises the importance of the creative industries and supports the sector through funding and through the tax system.
In considering any changes to existing tax reliefs or introducing new ones, Government must consider a wide range of factors, including the specific aims of the relief, the costs and complexity of designing and administering new provisions, and fairness. Decisions on tax are taken by the Chancellor at fiscal events, in the context of overall public finances.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Pitt-Watson on 14 September (HL Deb cols 964-967), (1) what is the annual VAT yield attributable to accommodation and food and beverage services in the hospitality sector, and (2) what assumptions were used in calculating the estimate that reducing VAT...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Pitt-Watson on 14 September (HL Deb cols 964-967), (1) what is the annual VAT yield attributable to accommodation and food and beverage services in the hospitality sector, and (2) what assumptions were used in calculating the estimate that reducing VAT...
The annual VAT revenue attributable to accommodation and food and beverage services is estimated at £24 billion in 2026-27. The estimate of the annual cost of £11 billion of reducing the VAT rate on those services to 10% included an allowance for increase in demand and a resulting increase in VAT receipts from these services at a 10% rate. This estimate was on the usual basis for Budget policy costings.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the UK's infrastructure framework on competitiveness and inward investment; and what role the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority is playing in removing barriers to investment.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the UK's infrastructure framework on competitiveness and inward investment; and what role the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority is playing in removing barriers to investment.
Providing certainty, confidence and stability to investors and industry is one of the core objectives of the 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy. Through the Infrastructure Pipeline and by providing longer term funding certainty, the government is setting out clear plans for infrastructure.
The government is also delivering the reforms that industry and investors have been asking for. The Planning and Infrastructure Act, and reforms to regulation, will help provide more certainty and reduce burdens and barriers to investment and delivery, improving the UK’s competitiveness.
The National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority plays a key role in delivering government’s approach to infrastructure, especially delivering a more strategic and spatially-planned approach. It delivers this through its work overseeing the implementation of the 10 Year Infrastructure Strategy and publishing regular updates to the Infrastructure Pipeline.
Alongside the rest of HM Treasury and the Office for Investment, the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority also works closely with the private sector and the UK’s public financial institutions to ensure that there is sufficient capital to support growth. The National Wealth Fund supports this by addressing market failures and access-to-finance gaps, helping to crowd in private investment and unlock infrastructure projects that might not otherwise proceed.
It is clear that the government’s approach is working: business investment has increased by 4.9% since the beginning of this Parliament. And, since Q2 2024, the UK has had the fastest investment growth in the G7.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they expect a visitor levy will increase, decrease, or have no impact on the amount of local hospitality and tourism jobs in coastal and rural regions across the UK.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they expect a visitor levy will increase, decrease, or have no impact on the amount of local hospitality and tourism jobs in coastal and rural regions across the UK.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential economic impact of creating powers for strategic authorities to introduce an overnight visitor levy, including the effects on (1) employment, (2) hospitality, (3) investment, and (4) visitor demand; and whether they intend to publish their assessment.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential economic impact of creating powers for strategic authorities to introduce an overnight visitor levy, including the effects on (1) employment, (2) hospitality, (3) investment, and (4) visitor demand; and whether they intend to publish their assessment.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether granting strategic authorities the ability to introduce an overnight visitor levy would be compatible with their aim of resolving the cost-of-living crisis; and, if so, what was (1) the outcome of this, and (2) the reasoning behind it.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether granting strategic authorities the ability to introduce an overnight visitor levy would be compatible with their aim of resolving the cost-of-living crisis; and, if so, what was (1) the outcome of this, and (2) the reasoning behind it.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the cumulative administration and compliance costs on businesses that operate across a range of strategic authorities with differing overnight levy schemes; and what steps they intend to take to reduce those costs.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the cumulative administration and compliance costs on businesses that operate across a range of strategic authorities with differing overnight levy schemes; and what steps they intend to take to reduce those costs.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what impact assessment and analysis they have conducted into the impact of a visitor levy on (1) local jobs, (2) consumer spending, and (3) investment in communities.
To ask His Majesty's Government what impact assessment and analysis they have conducted into the impact of a visitor levy on (1) local jobs, (2) consumer spending, and (3) investment in communities.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what analysis they have made of how much the visitor levy will cost the (1) hospitality sector, and (2) working families, and of the expected impact in terms of hospitality jobs and spending across the economy.
To ask His Majesty's Government what analysis they have made of how much the visitor levy will cost the (1) hospitality sector, and (2) working families, and of the expected impact in terms of hospitality jobs and spending across the economy.
On 10 September, the Government published a response to the consultation on the Visitor Levy which provides more detail on the policy design, drawing on feedback from the accommodation and hospitality sectors, local government, and members of the public.
The impact of the Visitor Levy will largely depend on local decisions, with Mayors and local leaders empowered to decide if it is right for their region. Strategic authorities will decide whether to introduce a levy and, if so, will consider the impact on the local economy and consult on specific proposals, including how revenue will be used to support local growth. This will help local leaders to find an appropriate balance between supporting local economic priorities, such as tourism, ensuring a levy is affordable, including for working families, and providing stability and certainty for businesses. Strategic authorities will be required to publish an impact assessment, a summary of the consultation results and their response, including a final prospectus.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of why Britain's borrowing costs are the highest in the G7; and what plans they have to reduce them.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of why Britain's borrowing costs are the highest in the G7; and what plans they have to reduce them.
It is long-standing convention that the Government does not comment on specific market movements.
Fiscal credibility is the Chancellor’s first priority. That is why the Chancellor has set out that we will meet the fiscal rules, balancing the books with a buffer against uncertainty, controlling borrowing to bear down on inflation and debt interest costs, and reducing long term pressures on our public finances.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the current VAT treatment of heat batteries in light of the different rates applied to other clean heat technologies supported through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the current VAT treatment of heat batteries in light of the different rates applied to other clean heat technologies supported through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme.
Decisions on tax policy are taken by the Chancellor at fiscal events in the context of overall public finances.
Installations of qualifying energy-saving materials in residential accommodation, and buildings used solely for a charitable purpose, benefit from a temporary VAT zero rate until March 2027, after which they will revert to the reduced rate of VAT at five per cent.
When evaluating whether to add energy-saving materials to this relief, the Government uses three criteria. The technology must be primarily intended to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions; relieving the technology of VAT must be cost-effective; and it must be practical for HMRC and businesses to operate.
The Government plans to support the installation of heat batteries by making them eligible for the Boiler Upgrade Scheme. This will offer grants of £2,500 for heat battery installation in homes that are not suitable for heat pumps.
To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to the Bank of England press release Tripartite Commission Holdings of Nazi Gold at the Bank of England, published on 8 May 1997, what became of the (1) 114,637.213 troy ounces of fine gold, and (2) two Prussian State Mint gold bars; whether...
To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to the Bank of England press release Tripartite Commission Holdings of Nazi Gold at the Bank of England, published on 8 May 1997, what became of the (1) 114,637.213 troy ounces of fine gold, and (2) two Prussian State Mint gold bars; whether...
The Bank of England has confirmed that it no longer holds any gold recovered from Nazi Germany by the Tripartite Commission.[1]
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Pitt-Watson on 17 September (HL3074), what progress has been made towards the voluntary commitment by UK pension funds to allocate at least 10 per cent of their default funds in private markets by 2030, with at least half of...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Pitt-Watson on 17 September (HL3074), what progress has been made towards the voluntary commitment by UK pension funds to allocate at least 10 per cent of their default funds in private markets by 2030, with at least half of...
The Government is unlocking billions of pounds of investment through the landmark reforms introduced in the Pension Schemes Act.
The industry-led Mansion House Accord commitment includes investment in asset classes such as infrastructure, housing and venture capital, as well as the London Stock Exchange growth markets.
The Government is strongly encouraged by progress so far. As of 31 December 2025, 4.9% of pension default arrangements are invested in private markets. This is according to regulatory data published on 13 July 2026. 2.0% is invested specifically in UK private markets. The investment stretches across the full scope of the asset classes in the Accord commitment.
To ask His Majesty's Government what base year or other reference point they propose to use when calculating the increases required to maintain the value of (1) the basic State Pension, and (2) the full rate of the new State Pension, relative to earnings from April 2030.
To ask His Majesty's Government what base year or other reference point they propose to use when calculating the increases required to maintain the value of (1) the basic State Pension, and (2) the full rate of the new State Pension, relative to earnings from April 2030.
To ask His Majesty's Government which measure of average earnings they propose to use for State Pension uprating from April 2030; and over what reference period earnings growth will be measured.
To ask His Majesty's Government which measure of average earnings they propose to use for State Pension uprating from April 2030; and over what reference period earnings growth will be measured.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the same uprating calculation will apply to the basic State Pension and the full rate of the new State Pension from April 2030; and whether both will receive the same percentage increase each year.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the same uprating calculation will apply to the basic State Pension and the full rate of the new State Pension from April 2030; and whether both will receive the same percentage increase each year.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to publish worked examples showing how increases resulting from inflation or the 2.5 per cent minimum increase will be taken into account when calculating subsequent earnings-related increases under their proposed State Pension uprating arrangements.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to publish worked examples showing how increases resulting from inflation or the 2.5 per cent minimum increase will be taken into account when calculating subsequent earnings-related increases under their proposed State Pension uprating arrangements.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assumptions about the starting point, earnings measure, and uprating calculation, underpin their estimate of the fiscal effects of the proposed State Pension uprating reforms; and which assumptions have been supplied to the Office for Budget Responsibility.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assumptions about the starting point, earnings measure, and uprating calculation, underpin their estimate of the fiscal effects of the proposed State Pension uprating reforms; and which assumptions have been supplied to the Office for Budget Responsibility.
To ask His Majesty's Government what annual savings they forecast from the proposed State Pension uprating reforms between 2030–31 and 2039–40; and how they expect to fund any shortfall between those savings and the additional expenditure required for their proposed national care service.
To ask His Majesty's Government what annual savings they forecast from the proposed State Pension uprating reforms between 2030–31 and 2039–40; and how they expect to fund any shortfall between those savings and the additional expenditure required for their proposed national care service.