Skip to main content

1-20 of 79 results for dept:"Administration and Works Committee"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, further to that point; if Black Rod can decide what is and what is not a press conference, why can he not be trusted to decide where it should be held, particularly from the point of view of security, which may be vital to the event in question?...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c246
House
House of Lords

The extent to which we actually move decision-making away from the Chamber and on to Black Rod is a matter of fine judgment. There are some areas where that is perfectly reasonable, and seeking his advice on whether the meeting that was being held was a press conference, if the...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c246
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

I have to say that I thought that this was going to be a short debate, but it is in danger of turning into yesterday’s debate.

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

I am very sorry to intervene again, and I am grateful to the noble Lord. Do the same rules about the distinction between official and semi-official press conferences apply in the House of Commons? Do Members of Parliament have asked the Serjeant at Arms if they can book a room...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

I am unaware of the precise rules that apply in the House of Commons, but as I understand it the House tends to deal with this matter by having a very strict rule about recording, photography and filming. That is the way in which it has dealt with the problem....

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

From what the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, has informed the House, which is why I put the question to him, the room in Millbank is no larger than the room in Fielden House. It is the same size, so what advantage can there be? We can have two press conferences,...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

I am reluctant to challenge the noble Lord on that issue. From my somewhat cursory examination of the rooms it looks quite a bit bigger to me, but never mind. As I say, I am more than happy to take the report back specifically on the use of Millbank House...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all those who have spoken, particularly the noble Lord, Lord Howell, whose influence I hope will lead to a favourable decision when we come to the end of this debate. I am not disposed to withdraw my amendment; I wish to press it to...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 cc247-8
House
House of Lords

Lord Higgins:

If I have understood the situation correctly, the Chairman of Committees has said that he is prepared to take it back to the committee, including the issue of Committee Room G. Is that not right?

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c248
House
House of Lords

The Chairman of Committees:

If I could clarify, I am prepared to take back the report purely on the limited area of the use of Millbank House. If, of course, the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, persists in his amendment, I will maintain the report and the Millbank House option will not...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c248
House
House of Lords

Lord Higgins:

In that case, the situation is rather clearer and I had misunderstood. Would it not be more sensible for the noble Lord to take it back to the committee without any restraint on what it can discuss? If we go ahead and, as I think is likely, carry the...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c248
House
House of Lords

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath:

My Lords, perhaps I might offer a bit of advice. We did think that the Chairman of Committees had said that he would agree to a reference back to consider Millbank House. However, he said it on the basis of the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, not...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c248
House
House of Lords

The Chairman of Committees:

I am always happy to reflect. The difficulty is that we have a bit of a procedural problem about the nature of the Motion that is before us. I can give the categoric assurance that, if it is withdrawn, I can do it. However, if the noble...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c501
House
House of Lords

Lord Avebury:

I am not prepared to accept that undertaking. The argument the noble Lord has advanced that Millbank House is adequate for the purposes of press conferences is spurious. The noble Lord did not even venture to say anything in his intervention just now about the difficulties that disabled Members...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 cc501-249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been possible to clarify in the intervening period what would be the best procedural method to ensure that the House’s will is properly expressed and acted on. In those circumstances, I think that the best way forward is for me to withdraw the Motion and to...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c249
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to agree the first report from the Administration and Works Select Committee (HL 96 2012-13). Amendment by Lord Avebury disagreed to on division (82 to 163). Original motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Sewel
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL); Administration and Works Committee
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 cc238-249
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords:

No!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c248
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a short and straightforward report so I do not intend to detain the House for long. However, given that an amendment has been tabled to the Motion, I thought that it might be useful if I explained to the House how the committee reasoned its proposals.

As...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 cc238-9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Avebury

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 January 2013
Reference
742 c239
House
House of Lords