Skip to main content

1-20 of 67 results for dept:"Committee for Privileges (HL)"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to agree the second report from the Privileges Select Committee on the Guide to the Code of Conduct (HL 81 2009-10). Agreed to on question. (Debated with Lords motion to agree the second report from the House Select Committee on the Rules Governing the Use of...

Lead member
Lord Brabazon of Tara
Answering member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL); House Committee; Committee for Privileges (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c567-88
House
House of Lords

The battle but not the war.

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c588
House
House of Lords

I am glad that the noble Lord says that it is perfectly clear. Throughout the proceedings, we have tried to strike a balance between not discouraging noble Lords who have experience and expertise in these matters and know what they are talking about from speaking, and at the same time...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c587
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not disagree with the definition, but there should be an automatic exclusion from taking part in parliamentary activities. It is perfectly clear.

Member
Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c587
House
House of Lords

I am dealing with the guide to the code before us this afternoon. On those grounds, it would probably be a mistake for me to speculate. I am trying to answer as many questions as I can. The noble Lord, Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe, asked about putting a register of...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c586-7
House
House of Lords

Does my noble friend accept that a resolution of the House would be an alternative to legislation in the event that legislation were to be delayed?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c586
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this fascinating and wide-ranging debate. However, I hope noble Lords will agree that it is time for me to try to answer the points that have been made. Although I cannot guarantee to answer every point, I...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c585-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, drew attention to the fact that I had not spoken this afternoon. The reason I have not spoken up to now is to see how many people would get up on this point. I am glad to say that the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c584-5
House
House of Lords

We’ll see, my Lords. The noble Lord also asked—this is probably the last question that I have to answer—why the Lords spiritual were dealt with differently. As I pointed out to the right reverend Prelate, that is the case only regarding the stipend, and this applies only to paragraphs 8(c)...

Member
Lord Brabazon of Tara (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c588
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, agree with the general thrust and the vast majority of the recommendations of the report. I have just two reservations. I have been waiting for the noble Lord, Lord Stoddart, to raise again the matter that he raised in the previous debate on the subject and...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c583
House
House of Lords

As a member of the Eames group, may I for the record also associate myself with the sentiments expressed by the noble and right reverend Lord, Lord Eames, and say that the guidance that has now been revised is in my view better focused and has greater clarity than when...

Member
Lord Hart of Chilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c583
House
House of Lords

I am sorry—I do not mean that in a derogatory way. The Leader of the House, for whom I have great respect, looks upset. I would just like to know because sometimes the bureaucracy suggests things that are not in the best interests of the Members. As Members, we need...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c583
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a member of the Leader’s Group under the chairmanship of the noble and right reverend Lord, Lord Eames, I would like to follow him in saying that I support unreservedly the entirety of the guide as it is now and the changes made to it. I do...

Member
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c581-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall follow up on the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen. I have two questions. The first relates to an issue that I spoke on back in November when I expressed my unease at the inability to raise issues that would lead to...

Member
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c580-1
House
House of Lords

I can answer the noble Lord. The suggestion came from the Members on the Leader’s Group.

Member
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c583
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful. I thank the noble Lord. Now we are getting into a debate. We have had a series of monologues until now and I like debates. Now that my good friend, the noble Lord, Lord MacGregor, has said that the suggestion came from Members, I would be...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c584
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be quick because I want to refer only to three paragraphs of the Privileges Committee’s report. I played no part in the preparation of these documents, so I can be objective in congratulating all those who have been involved. However, I was involved more than 10...

Member
Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c584
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the code of conduct which the Leader’s Group presented to this House was considered in detail by the House last November. As the Hansard report of that discussion indicates, there was general support for the thinking behind our recommendations. We were, however, conscious that great importance should attach...

Member
Lord Eames (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c574-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the final draft of the Guide to the Code of Conduct was agreed by the Committee for Privileges on 1 March and published last week. The fact that we are debating it today is evidence of the priority it has been given. Many of your Lordships will recognise...

Member
Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c573-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, often, when I am showing people around this building, I say that I have worked here for more than 40 years and that I never enter it without a sense of awe for what it stands for, for what it is. As we are very close to the...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 March 2010
Reference
718 c572-3
House
House of Lords