Skip to main content

1-20 of 100 results for legtitle:"Arbitration Act 1996"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Arbitration Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 24 February 2025. The act amends the Arbitration Act 1996 in accordance with recommendations made by the Law Commission.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
8 May 2026
Reference
CBP-10134

My Lords, I entirely endorse what my noble and learned friend Lord Hoffmann has said, but I would like to say a word about the procedure that the noble Lord, Lord Hacking, has invited the Minister to adopt. Surely the stage of conferring with people as to what they think...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1578
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as an arbitrator, including in cases involving corruption in my practice hitherto. It seems to me that there are two types of corruption that we may be talking about. One is substantive corruption affecting the transaction which is the subject of an arbitration. That...

Member
Lord Mance (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1581-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin with an apology. I could not attend Second Reading because I was having my cataracts done. The happy consequence is that I can now see the Minister even more clearly on the Government Front Bench. I take this rather belated opportunity to welcome him to that...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1582-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I can be relatively brief because this is a short point. As the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hoffmann, said, the costs of any arbitration are in the discretion of the tribunal. I would add only a slight gloss on that. As the noble and...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1624
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am personally grateful to the Minister for engaging with me and others on this. These are technical matters, but it is important to get them right. I acknowledge the assistance I have had from my colleague Toby Landau KC, who, as the noble Lord, Lord Hacking, said...

Member
Lord Wolfson of Tredegar (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1628
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson, for welcoming me to my current position; I am very glad that he has 20/20 eyesight and is looking at these matters so closely. I am also thankful to my noble friend Lord Hacking for initiating this debate. He said very...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1584-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I might read out from Rule 44.2 of the CPR. It says that

“the general rule is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party; but … the court may make a different order”.

There is then considerable further guidance on the...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1625
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

3: Leave out Clause 13 and insert the following new Clause—

“Appeals to Court of Appeal from High Court decisions

(1) In section 18(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (restrictions on appeals to Court of Appeal), for paragraph (g) substitute—

“(g) from a decision of the High Court...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1626
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this group I will speak to Amendments 3 and 4, tabled in my name.

It has come to light that Clause 13 does not adequately codify the case law on appeals under Part 1 of the Arbitration Act 1996. I have tabled Amendment 3 to replace Clause 13...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1626-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank both noble Lords for their support for this amendment. I agree with noble Lord, Lord Beith, that drafting matters, and I agree with the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson. I note the support given to him by those individuals, including Toby Landau, who...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1628
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

4: Title, line 1, after “1996” insert “; and for connected purposes”

Member’s explanatory statement

The amendment amends the long title to cover my amendment to replace Clause 13.

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1628-9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hacking

1: After Clause 4, insert the following new Clause—

“Safeguarding against fraud and corruption

In section 33 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (general duty of the tribunal), after subsection (1)(b) insert—

“(c) safeguard the arbitration proceedings against fraud and corruption.””

Member
Lord Hacking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 c1575
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I address my amendment, I would like to express to your Lordships complete support for this Bill. I had the honour to be a member of the Special Public Bill Committee, so ably chaired by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas. I sat through all the...

Member
Lord Hacking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1575-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in that, since retiring from the Appellate Committee of your Lordships’ House, I have practised as an arbitrator. More to the point, I was the presiding arbitrator in the Nigerian case to which the noble Lord referred. Of course, no one could object to...

Member
Lord Hoffmann (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1576-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with both the noble and learned Lords, Lord Hope and Lord Hoffmann, that this amendment ought not to be accepted. However, it seems to me, as the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hoffmann, said, that everyone agrees with the sentiment behind what the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1578-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in relation to the intervention of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas, your Lordships will recall that on 27 March this year, when I was then the Minister in charge of the Bill, I said that I had written to the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, the ICC,...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1579-1580
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I associate myself with the wonderful words of the three noble and learned Lords and I share the concern of the noble Lord, Lord Hacking, but when I was reading theology, my then—wonderful—professor of theology said that the only way you know whether you have resolved a theological...

Member
Lord Sentamu (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1580-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is my intention to withdraw my amendment, but perhaps I could say just a few words after a fairly long debate on it. First, I thank those noble Lords—there were several—who accepted the principle that I sought to express. It was nice to have that support but,...

Member
Lord Hacking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1585-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I greatly regret that the noble Lord should have cast me as his personal nemesis, particularly since it is entirely desirable that an arbitration tribunal should have the power to do what he said Lord Bingham did in the case to which he referred; that is, to distinguish...

Member
Lord Hoffmann (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 September 2024
Reference
839 cc1623-4
House
House of Lords