Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,256 results for legtitle:"Armed Forces Bill 2005-06"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
19 December 2006
Reference
HC 180 2006-07
House
House of Commons

Notice given that Her Majesty has given her Royal Assent to the following Acts: Civil Aviation Act (CHAP 34), Fraud Act (CHAP 35), Wireless Telegraphy Act (CHAP 36), Parliamentary Costs Act (CHAP 37), Violent Crime Reduction Act (CHAP 38), Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act (CHAP 39), Education and Inspections Act (CHAP...

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
451 826-830
House
House of Commons

Civil Aviation Bill (CHAP 34), Fraud Bill (HL) (CHAP 35), Wireless Telegraphy Bill (HL) (CHAP 36), Parliamentary Costs Bill (HL) (CHAP 37), Violent Crime Reduction Bill (CHAP 38), Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill (CHAP 39), Education and Inspections Bill (CHAP 40), National Health Service Bill (HL) (CHAP 41), National Health Service...

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
451 c825
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
CHAP 52 2006

As the Minister indicated, the Opposition consider this to be one of the most important issues in the Bill. During the passage of the Bill in this place we tried to persuade the Government that it was necessary under the new arrangements to ensure that the commanding officer remained in...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c799-800
House
House of Commons

I understand why the hon. Gentleman wants the matter to be clearly set out. I thought that I had done that in my preceding remarks but I confirm ““exceptional cases”” again. I hope that my explanation has provided some reassurance.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c804
House
House of Commons

The amendments are designed to ensure that the court martial’s powers of sentencing are restricted to that of the CO so that there is no disincentive to elect for trial. Lords amendment agreed to. Lords amendments Nos. 21 to 24 agreed to.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c804
House
House of Commons

Broadly speaking, I agree with the hon. Gentleman. However, I think that the hon. Member for Aldershot (Mr. Howarth) would confirm that when, as a Select Committee, we spoke to serving soldiers, sailors and airmen, there was a feeling that on certain occasions commanding officers have not dealt with such...

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c802
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
George Howarth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c773
House
House of Commons

I am acutely aware of the sensitivity of the issue. The right hon. Member for Islwyn said that he hoped we could find a solution. He was not able to do so when he was in the Department. Clearly, there is an issue, but we have to consider whether there...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c773
House
House of Commons

The Lords amendments are a response to concerns raised in the Select Committee and the other place. They will extend the offence of inaccurate certification to prescribed equipment to ensure that equivalent equipment or land systems may be covered.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798
House
House of Commons

The Lords amendments are designed to clarify and simplify certain offences. None of them has any substantive effect on the overall scope of the clauses affected. Nothing will become an offence that is not already an offence under the Bill as it stands. The Lords amendments are designed solely to...

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment. I suggest that we might have a bit more of a debate on this amendment. It takes account of concerns expressed in the House and the other place about keeping a commanding officer in the...

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798-9
House
House of Commons

Again, I am grateful to the Minister for his brief comments. We spotted in Committee that there was a lacuna in the Bill. We tried to rectify that in this House, but we were unable to do so. I am thus grateful to their lordships for pressing the matter and...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment. Again, I will be brief. The Lords amendment will ensure the consistent application of the six-month time limit for charging civilians subject to service discipline. Lords amendment agreed to.

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c798
House
House of Commons

I am happy to agree with the hon. Gentleman, with whom I was happy to share that trip. He is right. The efficient and speedy implementation of the procedures is essential, and the military policeman in whatever service has an important role to play. I was anxious to ensure that...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c800-1
House
House of Commons

I am sorry if I have upset the hon. Gentleman this evening, but I agree with him on the amendment. Does he agree that when he and I and other members of the Select Committee travelled to Cyprus and spoke to investigating officers, it became clear that one of the...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c800
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Mike Hall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c795
House
House of Commons

I want to be brief, because we need to make progress. There is a long list of amendments. I am going to wrap my remarks up quite soon. What about the 2,700 soldiers who were sentenced to death, but had their sentences commuted? Will they be affected? Will they receive...

Member
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c795-6
House
House of Commons