Skip to main content

1-20 of 87 results for legtitle:"Cheshire (Structural Changes) Order 2008"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this has been, predictably, a hotly contested and passionate debate. It is no surprise to me that the loyalties expressed about the county of Cheshire were done so in the tone and language that noble Lords used. I think that we agree on much of what has been...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if we have listened to a classic tale of how things should not be done, then this is it. When I was in local government, we used to have an apocryphal tale of how Governments came to conclusions on anything. It ran along the lines that a problem...

Member
Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1058-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did not claim that in my opening speech and I have not claimed that in any debate on any of the unitary authorities that we have had so far because the invitation that was issued specifically said that we would not seek consensus and we would not...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1059-62
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister has reflected again on the position that the Government have taken, but the Government's decision was not based on consensus in any way at all. I hesitated to speak in this debate because I do not come from Cheshire, but the Minister cannot claim that the...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone who has taken part in this debate, in which the views of the majority of this House have been made very clear. I appreciate that the Government are in a difficult position, but it is of their own making. This is the first time that...

Member
Lord Wade of Chorlton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1063
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have already been admonished for the lack of brevity of my speeches tonight, so I shall take inspiration from Raúl Castro rather than from Fidel Castro in the length of what I have to say. Only three points have been made, so I can keep it brief....

Member
Lord Harrison (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1062
House
House of Lords

rose to move, as an amendment to the amendment in the name of Lord Wade of Chorlton, at end to insert ““and Parliament has had the opportunity to debate their opinions.”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, let me introduce you to the ancient, proud and historic location of the...

Member
Lord Harrison (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1039-43
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when the Victorian county boundaries were settled, those responsible tried to follow natural boundaries as far as possible. In the case of Cheshire, that was the River Tame, the River Mersey, the Derbyshire hills and the Welsh border in particular. The church followed that, so the Diocese of...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1044-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise, but in mitigation, I hope that the point that I made right at the beginning will be understood: that we have simply not had the opportunity to put our point of view. Despite other Members of this House having applied repeatedly to the Chancellor, the Secretary...

Member
Lord Harrison (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1044
House
House of Lords

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion, at end to insert ““but this House calls on Her Majesty’s Government not to proceed with the draft order until the residents of Cheshire have been fully and properly consulted and have been able to express a view on the division...

Member
Lord Wade of Chorlton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1036-9
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 31 January be approved. The noble Baroness said: My Lords, today we are debating the order that brings into effect two unitary authorities for Cheshire. I am well aware that this decision has raised considerable passion in this...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1029-36
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister must be relieved that we are at the end of the current batch of orders, because they get more controversial as they go along. We on these Benches support the principle of unitary government. However, it is a question of process. It is disingenuous of the...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1056-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by apologising to the Minister for missing the first couple of minutes of her introduction—she seemed to slip her leash a little early—but I got the gist of what she was saying in the remainder of her speech. It has been 40 years since I lived...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1054-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, reminded us that this is as much about geographical spread as optimal numbers. However, it is also about the realities of people’s loyalties; their understanding of where they belong and with whom they identify. The noble Baroness also said that this was not...

Member
Earl of Selborne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1053-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend made a very long speech and I hope that I will not be trespassing on the House if I try to pursue my argument. I do not want noble Lords to be kept for too long. Like the noble Lord, Lord Wade, I agree with...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1052-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Harrison (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1052
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not be supporting the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Wade, or the additional amendments tabled by my noble friends. I do not know Cheshire well enough to be in any position to speak, and it would be impertinent of me to talk about boundaries and...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1052
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened to the debate with great interest and three questions have come to mind. The first is the question of the release of any independent financial assessment. Another was touched on by the right reverend Prelate: will these proposals meet the needs of local people, especially...

Member
Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1051
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise simply to express my full support for Amendment No. 1. The arguments put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Wade of Chorlton, in support of his amendment are compelling and I do not think it is either necessary or helpful for me to repeat them. Whether...

Member
Lord Slynn of Hadley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1051
House
House of Lords

My Lords, not for the first time, Members of your Lordships' House, including myself, have received a lot of letters and telephone calls from individuals and organisations who feel that their voice has not been heard and that they have not been given the opportunity to express their views. I...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2008
Reference
699 c1050-1
House
House of Lords