Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for legtitle:"Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will amend the Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012 to ensure that Article 69a will only apply as a last resort when the non-resident parent is not making maintenance payments through PAYE and other unearned income (such as...

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2023
Reference
180919
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reason Regulation 4(1) of the Child Support (Child Support Maintenance) Calculations Regulations 2012 provides that a relevant tax year for the calculation of child maintenance by a paying parent is any one of the six years immediately preceding...

Asked by
Douglas Chapman (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
290837
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reasons regulation 4(1) of the Child Support (Child Support Maintenance) Calculations Regulations 2012 provides that a relevant tax year for the calculation of child maintenance by a paying parent is any one of the six years immediately preceding...

Asked by
Douglas Chapman (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Supreme Court ruling of 24 September that Parliament was not prorogued on 9 September.
Date
9 September 2019
Reference
286787
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of changing the level of historic income in a non-resident parent's salary within the Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012 in order to allow for a more recent updated calculation...

Asked by
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2016
Reference
53562
House
House of Commons

Draft Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2012. Draft Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012. Draft Child Support Maintenance (Changes to Basic Rate Calculation and Minimum Amount of Liability) Regulations 2012. Lords motions to approve. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Lord Freud
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
17 October 2012
Reference
739 c1500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to the draft Child Support Maintenance (Changes to Basic Rate Calculation and Minimum Amount of Liability) Regulations 2012. These two sets of regulations were laid before both Houses on 2 July 2012 under the powers contained in the Child Support Act 1991, as amended...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc494-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing these regulations. We should start by making it clear that we support the thrust of the approach reflected in them. Indeed, why wouldn’t we? It stems from our work on legislation when in government. We support the objective of maximising the number...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc498-500GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may make a brief intervention in this important debate. I am opposed to charging, and I hope that we will be able to get rid of it. I understand that there are deficit reduction problems, but an important state-run service should be available to single parents...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc500-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to pick up where the noble Lord left off. I am grateful for the opportunity to discuss this rather large package of regulations. In doing so, I should remind the Committee of my declared interests, which include having been a non-executive director of CMEC and,...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc502-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, because the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, and the noble Baroness, Lady Sherlock, have covered almost all the points I was going to make, I shall be very brief. It is estimated that the new system will lose between £3 million and £4 million a month, which is very...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c506GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the debate has strayed somewhat from these regulations, most substantially into the readiness of IT. I shall try to deal with that issue full on, because it is a fair question.

The concern is that the new system is late and will not work, and the normal things that...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc506-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lord, that is what worries me. Is it still the case that the target date for the introduction of phase two is July 2013, with a few weeks’ slippage?

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c507GC
House
House of Lords

We are still on that timetable, absolutely. But we will be flexible as a department. The one piece of advice that the Public Accounts Committee has given to us as a Government, and to the last Government, is to feel our way into these things, to be flexible, pathfind the...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c507GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister. As I understand it, one of the arguments for the new system was that, as it would be more efficient, there would be fewer staff needed to run it and it would be cheaper et cetera. I know that that may all be up...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c507GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, my Lords. The approach is to bring in a new system, which is efficient and automated, at a level that does not consume a lot of resource to start with. You are running your existing systems with the resource that they require. As you ramp up the new system,...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 cc508-9GC
House
House of Lords

I apologise for interrupting the Minister. The question I asked there was: if it is a net pay arrangement, does it get dealt with automatically via HMRC? If it is not, then it requires the non-resident parent to do something, to say, “I am making these contributions and want that...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c509GC
House
House of Lords

May I offer to write on that issue? We are layers down. Rather than dealing with that impromptu I will aim to write, as I will on how the prompts might work for the non-resident parent on their pensions. Again, that is getting to a level of technicality that I...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c509GC
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that those who will pay more and the lone parents with care who are getting less may not be the same pairs of people? Obviously one cannot assume that the poorest parents with care are necessarily partnered to the poorest non-resident parents, but actually research shows...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c509GC
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I have a precise breakdown within the socioeconomic groups to do that analysis. I will look later to see if I can send the noble Baroness some information on that. I am not sure off the top of my head that I know how that balances...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c509GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful for that. Also, if that is not the case, I would settle for an alternative justification of the decision.

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2012
Reference
739 c510GC
House
House of Lords