Skip to main content

1-20 of 510 results for legtitle:"Computer Misuse Act 1990"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
11432
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions she has had with cyber companies regarding the impact of the Computer Misuse Act on their international competitiveness.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
11433
House
House of Commons

This briefing explores what announcements the government could make in the King’s Speech on 13 May 2026 about science, innovation and technology.

Type
Lords Library Briefings - Debates
Date
7 May 2026
Reference
LLN-2026-0020

Statement on the arrest of a former Parliamentary employee.

Department
Speaker
Type
Speaker's statements
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c1
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 06/03/2026 from Kanishka Narayan MP to colleagues regarding the government’s timescales and plans for public consultation on proposals to reform the Computer Misuse Act 1990, as discussed during the Committee stage (seventh sitting) of the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill. 2p.

Deposited by
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Deposited papers
Date
6 March 2026
Reference
DEP2026-0202
House
House of Commons

The noble Baroness did, actually. She said that nothing was happening under this Government. Every Member on this side of the House heard her say that.

The hour is late so I will go to the nub of the issue, which is the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Jackson. Law...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1392-1400
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage third day. Amendment 334 agreed to on division (213 to 145). Amendments 338 to 340, 345, 347, 349 and 353 agreed to. Amendment 358 disagreed to on division (52 to 146). Amendment 359 disagreed to on division (129 to 132). Amendments 362 to 365 agreed to. (Part...

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Baroness Levitt; Lord Katz
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1318-1399
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will contribute briefly on this group. In general, the amendment produced by my noble friend the Minister is to be applauded. It is massive and detailed—but this is one of the issues. We are on Report in the House of Lords. The House of Commons will never...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1318
House
House of Lords

Is my noble friend aware that they actually had an extensive debate on this matter in the Commons?

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1318
House
House of Lords

This amendment has just turned up here. It is for this House; it was not dealt with in the Commons. That is why we are debating it. It is a brand-new amendment. It is extensive—two or three pages.

I know I am a bit out of date, having been here so...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1318-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a paid adviser to the Metropolitan Police. My understanding is that the Government’s amendments simply create a legal level playing field, with deterrents currently available on the grounds of race and religion being extended to other protected characteristics. It is far more serious...

Member
Lord Paddick (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1319
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for the way he introduced these amendments. As he said, this is a government manifesto commitment, and it was evident in the pride with which he moved this amendment. However, I agree with concern raised by the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, and...

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1319-1320
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the noble Lord. Can he give a practical example of when there has ever been a relevant criminal offence committed against a person because they are not deaf?

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1321
House
House of Lords

I cannot—not as a lawyer; I cannot refer to case law on this—but I would not rely on past example alone. If we are passing laws that seek to apply equality, we should seek to apply it on the basis of somebody’s disability status, whether they are disabled or not....

Member
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1321
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Parkinson, for raising the issue about someone who was not deaf. Unfortunately, he has forgotten that the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 set out exactly why people with disabilities were disadvantaged in society—and, frankly, still are. That is why some...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1321-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. That she spoke as powerfully as she did—and I hope to echo some of her words—draws attention to the fact that so few of us in this House have a severe disability and therefore look at these...

Member
Lord Shinkwin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1322-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to acknowledge and thank the Minister for the introduction of this amendment. It is a vast improvement on the amendment laid in the other place. We discussed it at Second Reading and in Committee, and it is great to see it on Report.

However much we might...

Member
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1323-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw attention to my entry in the register of interests. I chair the College of Policing, but I am not speaking in that capacity, nor have I spoken to policing colleagues about this matter.

I want to make a couple of observations about the debate that we have...

Member
Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1324-5
House
House of Lords

That is the second or third time that the 2021 report of the Law Commission of England and Wales has been referred to in this debate. To clarify, that report clearly and strongly recommended not including sex as a protected, aggravated characteristic in the charging or sentencing regime. It set...

Member
Lord Young of Acton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 c1325
House
House of Lords

But my argument was against the proposal that these offences in their entirety should be rejected by this House—that the Government’s proposal in its entirety should be rejected by this House. I was not engaging with my noble friend’s argument. I have some sympathy with his point, and in particular...

Member
Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2026
Reference
853 cc1325-6
House
House of Lords