Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,678 results for legtitle:"Counter-terrorism and Security Bill 2014-15"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
CHAP 6 2015; 2015 c. 6

Clause 17 of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill requires the Secretary of State to publish factors that she considers are appropriate to take into account when deciding whether to impose restrictions under paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 of the TPIM Act (travel restrictions).

The following factors are appropriate to take into...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
HCWS287
House
House of Commons

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Theresa May) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

Clause 17 of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill requires the Secretary of State to publish factors that she considers are appropriate to take into account when deciding whether to...

Member
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
HLWS259
House
House of Lords
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
12 February 2015
Reference
592 cc1000-1
House
House of Commons

Returned from the Commons with the Lords amendments agreed to.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
11 February 2015
Reference
759 c1352
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, that this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c728
House
House of Commons

On the day the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill was last considered by this House, news of the appalling events in Paris and the brutal murders at the office of Charlie Hebdo were still unfolding. What followed was a two-day manhunt for those responsible, a horrific attack on a Jewish supermarket...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 cc728-9
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for giving way so early, but is not consideration of these issues the job of elected Members—those who bothered to go to the electorate—not that affront to democracy down the corridor whose Members have taken it upon themselves to form Government business?

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

The very reason we are debating the amendments is that the House has an opportunity to consider them, so the hon. Gentleman’s argument is completely false.

During the permission stage, the court would have the power to refuse permission for the order where prior permission was being sought, and in retrospective...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

That does provide me with the reassurance I sought at an earlier stage, and I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for having listened carefully to the representations made here and in another place. They are most welcome and I believe will add considerably to the Bill’s legitimacy.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. and learned Friend for his comments and recognise that he raised these issues and questioned the original proposals when they were debated in this place.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

Alas, I am not quite at the same stage of happy reassurance as my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr Grieve). Will my right hon. Friend reassure me that the additional judicial step will not mean that, in the time we understand it will take for...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend will recall, we have retained the initial decision by the Secretary of State, but, as with the legal process for terrorism prevention

and investigation measures, it would then be for the court to consider whether it was right for the Secretary of State to have taken...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c729
House
House of Commons

If the person against whom the order is sought is outside UK jurisdiction, how would they appeal and what recompense would there be if the appeal is successful and the conviction quashed?

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c730
House
House of Commons

The whole point is that such people will be outside the country. The aim of a temporary exclusion order is to ensure that when they return to the UK, they do so on our terms, which is why their passport would not be available to them and they would have...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c730
House
House of Commons

I hope to say a few words on this subject later if I get the opportunity to do so, but will the Home Secretary tell me whether subsection (3) of the new clause proposed by amendment 16, which applies the duty to ensure freedom of speech and academic freedom to...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c730
House
House of Commons

The draft guidance has been subject, as my hon. Friend knows, to consultation. We received a significant number of responses to the draft guidance, and we are going through those responses in order to make changes as appropriate. The point of building this directly into the Bill is that it...

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c731
House
House of Commons

Can the Home Secretary assure me that when she considers the responses to the consultation, the final document will be so cast that it does not, albeit inadvertently, impede the work of genuine, benign and well-intentioned student bodies such as Christian unions and other groups that are active within our...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c731
House
House of Commons

I can give my hon. Friend that assurance. There is no intention to make any impact on the sort of benign organisation to which he refers.

Member
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c731
House
House of Commons

The Home Secretary is generous in giving way on this point. I am sure she can understand the concerns raised locally with me, a university MP, and I welcome the renewed emphasis on freedom of speech and on the stronger scrutiny for Parliament in amendment 16. Can she assure me...

Member
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
592 c731
House
House of Commons