Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for legtitle:"Data Retention Regulations 2014"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the regulations are made under the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act, which became law two weeks ago. They provide the detail of how communications providers can be required to retain data and the increased safeguards that will be in place for these data. They therefore form part...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1527-1531
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a Liberal Democrat and a former senior police officer I am acutely aware of the need to balance privacy and security. In these regulations, as my noble friend the Minister said, the Government appear to be maintaining the status quo with some additional safeguards, going a little...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 c1531
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been through these regulations and the Explanatory Memorandum with some care and I have also taken the trouble of ascertaining the views of David Anderson QC, the independent reviewer to these regulations. There were a number of unanswered questions during Second Reading recently, particularly relating to...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 c1531
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for the care he has taken in going through the detail today and to other noble Lords who have added their comments. I do not think it is necessary to repeat the arguments and debate we had during the passage of the...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1531-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords who have spoken on this. There has been a general welcome for these regulations, as there was for the Bill in general. I appreciate the support of the House in what has been a difficult matter for Parliament to resolve satisfactorily, and I believe...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1532-3
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the noble Lord. I asked the question because I thought that, when he spoke, he mentioned the Information Commissioner and not the Interception of Communications Commissioner. I was trying to get to the relationship between each of them when it comes to undertaking the six-monthly...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 c1533
House
House of Lords

The Information Commissioner has a role, as has been made clear. However, it is a continuing role in investigating this; it is not a question of reports or reviews. The six-monthly review is done by the Interception Commissioner, and the oversight of retained data in respect of security and deletion...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 c1533
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach
Answering member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
29 July 2014
Reference
755 cc1527-1533
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Unprinted command papers
Notes
Replaces explanatory memorandum in UP 458 2014-15
Date
22 July 2014
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
HL 35 2014-15
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That the draft Data Retention Regulations 2014, which were laid before this House on 21 July, be approved.

The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, which passed into law last week, was a necessary response to a European Court of Justice judgment that called into question the...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 cc1283-5
House
House of Commons

I am sure the Minister will agree that for that public debate and a review to take place, we need good statistics and information. One of the few things that seems to be missing from the previous regulations and the new ones is a section about statistics. Will he confirm...

Member
Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1284
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for highlighting this aspect. As he knows, in the debates last week we underlined the need for greater transparency and reporting of information about the use of the powers under the Act. I can assure him that we will take that forward. He...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 cc1284-6
House
House of Commons

I very much support the process that the Government have brought forward today. The Opposition will support the regulations before the House this afternoon. As the Minister has said, they are made under the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, which we debated last Tuesday, although it seems a...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1286
House
House of Commons

The interception of communications commissioner is required to make a six-monthly review, and my expectation is that that would certainly cover the use of those powers. We need to consider the interrelationship with the Information Commissioner, because it is a separate regulator that looks at the retention of those data....

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1286
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for that response. My main point is that the legislation’s sunset clause means that it will cease to have effect in December 2016. The regulations are being made by the House today, but I want to ensure that they are examined on a regular...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1287
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for contacting my office earlier today to highlight that point, to which he will have heard me make specific reference in my opening remarks. A further draft of the explanatory memorandum is certainly in the process of being relayed, if that has...

Member
James Brokenshire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1287
House
House of Commons

I just thought that it was worth placing that on the record, as I would not wish there to be any confusion, given the nature of the debate we are having today.

I am happy to support the regulations, given the potential for review and the safeguards we have put in...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 c1287
House
House of Commons

I will speak to the regulations only briefly. I think that there are a couple of points worth making. It is interesting to compare the debate we are having now with the one in 2009. Back then, no time at all was given to discuss the regulations, which were moved...

Member
Julian Huppert (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 cc1287-8
House
House of Commons

I would like to vote against these regulations but will not, because I do not wish to eat into the time for the summer recess debate, which I also want to participate in—there is self-interest in that as well. I just want to raise again the issue of professional secrecy....

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2014
Reference
584 cc1288-9
House
House of Commons