Skip to main content

1-20 of 106 results for legtitle:"Detention Centre Rules 2001"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government how often reports submitted under (1) Rule 32 of the Short-term Holding Facility Rules 2018, and (2) Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, are audited by Home Office officials.

Asked by
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2023
Reference
HL868
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many reports under (1) rule 32 of the Short-term Holding Facility Rules 2018, and (2) rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, were issued in (a) 2021, (b) 2022, and (c) 2023; and how many led to the release of an individual detained...

Asked by
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2023
Reference
HL402
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are planning to update (1) the Detention Centre Rules 2001, and (2) the Adults at Risk Policy; and if so, when and whether there will be a consultation on the changes proposed.

Asked by
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
HL347
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendments 1B, 7B and 90D.

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c638
House
House of Commons

Last Tuesday, this House voted 18 times —more times than on any other day on any other piece of legislation—and 18 times it voted to support this Bill.

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c638
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
William Wragg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c638
House
House of Commons

I will first make a few opening remarks.

This House sent back to the House of Lords its 20 amendments to the Bill, many of which simply drove a coach and horses through the fabric of the legislation. We brought forward reasonable amendments where it was sensible to do so and...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc638-9
House
House of Commons

I thoroughly endorse what my right hon. Friend says. This is a matter of extreme national interest, as is reflected in the votes of constituents throughout the country. They feel very strongly about these matters. Does he not agree that it is time for their lordships to take note of...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c639
House
House of Commons

I strongly endorse my hon. Friend’s comments. This is an issue of the highest importance to the people we serve in this place. Of course there is a legitimate role for the other place in scrutinising legislation, but now is the time to move forward and pass this law to...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c639
House
House of Commons

I wonder whether my right hon. Friend has noted the remarks of Lord Clarke, who is not a particularly vicious right-wing creature. He said this Bill is entirely necessary and that we have to get on with it.

I also wonder whether my right hon. Friend has looked at today’s remarks...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c639
House
House of Commons

I read the remarks of the noble Lord Clarke, and I entirely agree with his point, which is that, having listened to the totality of the debate in the House of Lords, he had not heard a single credible alternative to the Government’s plan. For that reason alone, it is...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c639
House
House of Commons

I completely agree with my right hon. Friend. I believe that the Bill should go through, as we have to do something about the deaths in the channel, which is an important moral purpose.

I bring my right hon. Friend back to Lord Randall’s amendment on modern slavery. We agree quite...

Member
Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc639-640
House
House of Commons

First, the Lords amendment on modern slavery goes further by making the scheme, as we see it, much more difficult to establish. There are a number of reasons but, in particular, we think the complexity of the issue requires it to be provided for in statutory guidance rather than on...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c640
House
House of Commons

The Democratic Unionist party is concerned about the trafficking of children and young people. My question is a simple one. We see economic migrants who are fit and healthy but none the less make that journey, and we see those who have had to leave their country because they have...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c640
House
House of Commons

We believe that they do, because at the heart of this scheme is the principle that if an individual comes to the UK illegally on a small boat, they will be removed back home if it is safe to do that—if they are going to a safe home country such...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c640
House
House of Commons

Let me take the right hon. Gentleman back to the criticism he was making of the other place, because if the elected House is about to break international law, it is entirely fitting that the other place should try to prevent that from happening. The Minister has stood at the...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c641
House
House of Commons

I am not sure exactly what the hon. Lady’s question was. If it was about access to safe and legal routes, let me be clear, as I have in numerous debates on this topic, that since 2015 the UK has welcomed more than 500,000 individuals here—it is nearer to 550,000...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c641
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister set out how my constituent will be protected? He is Albanian and has been subjected to modern slavery by gangs from Albania. He has three bullet holes in his body and, if he returns, perhaps those gangs will give him more. How will he be protected?

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c641
House
House of Commons

The existing arrangement that we have secured with Albania—incidentally, Albania is a signatory to the European convention against trafficking—

enables us to safely return somebody home to Albania, with specific assurances to prevent them being retrafficked to the United Kingdom and to enable them to be supported appropriately upon arrival.

On...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 cc641-2
House
House of Commons

Many opponents of the Bill seem to support uncapped safe and legal routes. The reality of that would be that potentially over 1 million people could get the ability to come here. Does the Minister agree that those proposing that should be open and honest about it, and explain what...

Member
Tom Hunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2023
Reference
736 c642
House
House of Commons