Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,444 results for legtitle:"Digital Economy Bill 2016-17"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Matt Hancock
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
11 January 2018
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
CHAP 30 2017; 2017 c. 30

My Lords, as someone who has renovated a Victorian house, I know one thing to be true. It is all very well stripping off the anaglypta and the woodchip, slapping on some Farrow & Ball, improving the coving and putting up a dado rail, but if you do not tackle...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1488
House
House of Lords

I regret that the Government decided not to accept Lords Amendment 242. The Minister in the other place said in his speech yesterday that the technology of broadcasting and internet-based on-demand viewing are completely different. I am afraid that that is not right. The two technologies are merging as television...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1496-7
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons Reason and Amendments. Lords amendments not insisted on. Commons amendment and amendments in lieu agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Ashton of Hyde
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1486-1506
House
House of Lords
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
624 c1232
House
House of Commons

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1486
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Motion covers two areas where the other place has offered amendments in lieu of your Lordships’ amendments. Lords Amendment 1 on the universal service obligation challenged the Government to be more ambitious on universal digital connectivity. A broadband USO, set initially at 10 megabits per second, forms...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1487-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome the two amendments in lieu in the Motion moved by the Minister. Having said that, I think we are at liberty also to regret that they do not go further.

The issue that we are dealing with here, which I think has been well picked up by...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1488-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for those remarks by noble Lords. The noble Lord, Lord Fox, talked about the fundamentals. They are what we have tried to address in this Bill to increase digital connectivity in the country. Measures in the Bill which have been accepted, on the Electronic Communications...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1489
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1489
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1491
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want again to start by saying that the Government accept and agree with the spirit of Lords Amendment 40, but, as drafted, it poses difficulties and risks unintended consequences. For example, it is not clear who would notify social media providers that content contravened existing legislation. The...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1491-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have no doubt that the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, will want to give a more substantive response since this was fundamentally an opposition amendment, but it was supported strongly on these Benches. I accept that the Minister has tried to incorporate the spirit of the original amendment...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1492
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not delay the House but I want to repeat what the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, has just said because the point about no enforcement and no sanctions is important. I recognise the words of the Minister in terms of reflecting the spirit and intent of our...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1492-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the remarks of noble Lords and I shall start by responding to the last comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Collins. I think that the social media companies are in absolutely no doubt about the Government’s determination to review what they do and...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1493
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1493
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we return yet again to the issue of BBC funding, having debated it at length in Committee and on Report. Honourable Members in the other place have disagreed with the amendments that noble Lords inserted into the Bill at

Report stage which sought to establish a BBC licence...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1493-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the three amendments which are the subject of Motion D came before your Lordships in the names of myself, the noble Baroness, Lady Bonham-Carter, and the noble Lords, Lord Inglewood and Lord Stevenson. They were passed by noble Lords with a thumping majority but they are now to...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 c1495
House
House of Lords

My Lords, about a year ago I introduced a Private Member’s Bill that was too low in the ballot to have any chance of being debated or passed. When that became evident, I decided instead to use this Bill as a vehicle to protect the independence and funding of the...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1495-6
House
House of Lords