Skip to main content

1-20 of 784 results for legtitle:"Draft House of Lords Reform Bill"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have no wish to extend discourtesy in public life, as the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, did when he described my costings of the Richard report as complete nonsense. I will not apply those words to the Government’s costings. However, would the noble Lord the Leader of...

Member
Lord Lipsey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the underlying assumptions and cost projections are in the public domain today. I fully expect that they will be given robust scrutiny by the IFS, the TaxPayers’ Alliance, the Labour Party and anyone else who wishes to examine them. Of course, the Government will reply to any questions...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister accept that the decision to have a list system will mean that this House would be in effect appointed by the political parties in many cases? The people they would appoint would be those who would not in other circumstances be chosen for this House....

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, apart from powers, one of the key areas will be the electoral system, which is different from the one originally proposed in the draft Bill. It is different from what was suggested by the Joint Committee, although the committee suggested some improvements to the original system on which...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c247
House
House of Lords

Will the Leader of the House at least consider that, after the White Paper and all the deliberations, consultations, and discussions he has made a bad Bill worse? First, as has just been pointed out, the new senators will be less independent than originally proposed because not only will the...

Member
Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c248
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord says that Peers elected under this new system will be even less independent. We are not calling them senators at the moment: we are not calling them anything. I think that the Bill calls them Members of the House of Lords, but they will not...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c248
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that the Leader of the House will agree that there has been a long tradition that when Law Lords retired they made a significant contribution to the deliberations of this House and

that it is an important tradition to maintain. Will he tell me whether the...

Member
Lord Woolf (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 cc248-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have every sympathy with what the noble and learned Lord says because I am one of many who voted against the constitutional vandalism of tearing out the Law Lords from this House five or six years ago. However, it is a bit like toothpaste; you cannot put...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has repeatedly told the House that at the last general election all parties had some form of commitment to election of this House in their manifestos—they were markedly different, I would remind him. That being the case, no elector in this country had the opportunity...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my right honourable friend the Deputy Prime Minister is really not at all convinced that there is a strong case for a referendum on this matter. Earlier, I said that the cost of a referendum would be around £80 million. At a time of economic austerity, this seems—

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

It is all very well noble Lords laughing at this. The public will see that they are laughing at a huge amount of public money being spent on a referendum when all three parties and the coalition manifesto said that there should be reform of this House.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

On the contrary, I think that noble Lords were probably laughing at the transparent inadequacy of the answer. We now see on

page 36 of the Bill the enormous constituencies that are proposed for electing Members of this House. There are eight of these huge constituencies and it will take...

Member
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c249
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with some of what the noble Baroness says: I think that elected Members will probably defer less than is the case with the current House. That of course is something that the House of Commons will need to take into account when it comes to its...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly endorse what the noble Baroness, Lady Symons, has just said. Certainly, if I am elected to this House, I shall be very assertive. However, looking at the way that the list system operates, I am not sure that the Prime Minister will put me on the...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have made the point about the primacy of the House of Commons and I stand by it. Of course it is an essential principle of democracy that those who make the law should be

elected and of course it is true that this House makes the law,...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am aged 78 and I expect personal decomposition before we ever agree on the composition of this House. I welcome what is in the Bill about the independent Members and the statutory commission but I raise one single question. How can the noble Lord the Leader of...

Member
Lord Williamson of Horton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think the whole House would agree that the noble Lord looks to be in robust health and I wish him continuation of that for very many long years. The line he takes is the point made by the noble and right reverend Lord, Lord Harries. It is...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, why did the Government ask Her Majesty the Queen to appoint a record number of new life Peers, all of whom are of course personally very welcome, so that we now have a record number of some 660 life Peers? Why did they do that when they were...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c251
House
House of Lords

I do not think that there is any difference. We decided there should be a transition arrangement over three parliamentary terms. That will give the existing House, including any new Peers appointed since 2010, the opportunity to remain here until 2025 if they survive that long and if they survive...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 June 2012
Reference
738 c251
House
House of Lords