1-20 of 163 results for legtitle:"Draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.249 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- legtitle:"Draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill"
- We searched for
- legislationTitle_t:"Draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill" OR legislationTitle_t:"Human Tissue and Embryos Bill (Draft)" OR legislationTitle_ses:394388
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
That this House notes with great concern that the Government has proposed in the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill removing the requirement that those providing IVF services must have regard for the need of any resulting child for a father in subsection 2(b) and also facilitating the deliberate bringing of children into the world for whom no man can legally be considered to be their father in Clause 51(1); expresses concern that, given the wealth of research demonstrating the very important and distinctive contribution fathers bring to parenting, these proposals are profoundly misinformed and clearly undermine the best interests of the child; recognises that this move is inconsistent with the recent statement made by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions that `we want to significantly reduce the numbers of children with no dad on their birth certificate', and prioritises the desires of adults over the rights of children in the area of assisted reproduction; and calls on the Government to ensure that the final Bill preserves the 1990 father's provision and does not propose denying any child from birth a legal father who is male.
That this House notes with great concern that the Government has proposed in the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill removing the requirement that those providing IVF services must have regard for the need of any resulting child for a father in subsection 2(b) and also facilitating the deliberate bringing...
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent representations he has received on the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent representations he has received on the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill.
asked Her Majesty's Government:What consideration they have given to the view of the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill that denying the existence of a biological father on birth certificates ““involves the authorities and we are deeply concerned about the idea that the authorities may be...
asked Her Majesty's Government:What consideration they have given to the view of the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill that denying the existence of a biological father on birth certificates ““involves the authorities and we are deeply concerned about the idea that the authorities may be...
That this House notes with great concern that the Government has proposed in the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill removing the requirement that those providing IVF services must have regard for the need of any resulting child for a father in subsection 2(b) and also facilitating the deliberate bringing of children into the world for whom no man can legally be considered to be their father in Clause 51 (1); expresses concern that, given the wealth of research demonstrating the very important and distinctive contribution fathers bring to parenting, these proposals are profoundly misinformed and clearly undermine the best interests of the child; recognises that this move is inconsistent with the recent statement made by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions that "we want to significantly reduce the numbers of children with no Dad on their birth certificate", and prioritises the desires of adults over the rights of children in the area of assisted reproduction; and calls on the Government to ensure that the final bill preserves the 1990 father's provision and does not propose denying any child from birth a legal father who is male.
That this House notes with great concern that the Government has proposed in the draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill removing the requirement that those providing IVF services must have regard for the need of any resulting child for a father in subsection 2(b) and also facilitating the deliberate bringing...
asked the Chairman of Committees:Whether all evidence received by the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill has been made available to the public, whether by publication in print and online or through deposit in readily accessible archives.
asked the Chairman of Committees:Whether all evidence received by the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill has been made available to the public, whether by publication in print and online or through deposit in readily accessible archives.
Today we have laid before Parliament the Government response to the Joint Committee's report on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill (Cm 7209). On 17 May 2007, the Government published draft legislation to revise and update the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. This was set out in the...
Today we have laid before Parliament the Government response to the Joint Committee's report on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill (Cm 7209). On 17 May 2007, the Government published draft legislation to revise and update the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. This was set out in the...
My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Health (Dawn Primarolo) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. Today we have laid before Parliament the Government response to the Joint Committee's report on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill (Cm 7209). On 17 May 2007, the Government published...
My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Health (Dawn Primarolo) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. Today we have laid before Parliament the Government response to the Joint Committee's report on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill (Cm 7209). On 17 May 2007, the Government published...
Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30) and Baroness Royall of Blaisdon on 11 July (WA 222-23), whether they will provide a fuller account of the reasoningemployed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in granting licence R0153; and in what...
Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30) and Baroness Royall of Blaisdon on 11 July (WA 222-23), whether they will provide a fuller account of the reasoningemployed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in granting licence R0153; and in what...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30), what assessment they have made of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on Government proposals for the regulation of hybrid and chimera embryos (HC 272), in particular, whether...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30), what assessment they have made of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on Government proposals for the regulation of hybrid and chimera embryos (HC 272), in particular, whether...
Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Royall of Blaisdon on 11 July (WA 222-23), whether the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is required only to consider research purposes; and whether it is able to license activities which are explicitly prohibited by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990; and
Further to the Written Answer by Baroness Royall of Blaisdon on 11 July (WA 222-23), whether the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is required only to consider research purposes; and whether it is able to license activities which are explicitly prohibited by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990; and
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30), whether definitions in the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill only apply in the context of that Bill; whether they apply to either the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 or...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 26 June (WA 129-30), whether definitions in the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill only apply in the context of that Bill; whether they apply to either the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 or...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Why they have committed to, and set out the main elements of a Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill in The Governance of Britain—The Government's Draft Legislative Programme (Cm 7175) before the publication of the report from the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft)...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Why they have committed to, and set out the main elements of a Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill in The Governance of Britain—The Government's Draft Legislative Programme (Cm 7175) before the publication of the report from the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft)...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of inter-species tetraploid complementation experiments regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, bearing in mind that tetraploid complementation is an established procedure for deriving whole mice from...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of inter-species tetraploid complementation experiments regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, bearing in mind that tetraploid complementation is an established procedure for deriving whole mice from...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill contains any prohibition against performing inter-species tetraploid complementation; and
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill contains any prohibition against performing inter-species tetraploid complementation; and
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of a potential route to human reproductive cloning in the form of a legally permissible regulated procedure under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the event that...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of a potential route to human reproductive cloning in the form of a legally permissible regulated procedure under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the event that...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of inter-species tetraploid complementation experiments regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, bearing in mind that tetraploid complementation is an established procedure for deriving whole mice from...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2), whether they have assessed the appropriateness of inter-species tetraploid complementation experiments regulated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, bearing in mind that tetraploid complementation is an established procedure for deriving whole mice from...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2) on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, whether they have assessed the possibility of a regulated procedure under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 involving the injection of human embryonic stem cells into...
Further to the Written Answer by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 25 June (WA 101-2) on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, whether they have assessed the possibility of a regulated procedure under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 involving the injection of human embryonic stem cells into...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 22 January (WA 204) and 26 June (WA 129-30), whether the remit of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority extends to the responsibility for licensing human embryo research which is prohibited by the Human Fertilisation...
asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answers by Lord Hunt of Kings Heath on 22 January (WA 204) and 26 June (WA 129-30), whether the remit of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority extends to the responsibility for licensing human embryo research which is prohibited by the Human Fertilisation...