Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,663 results for legtitle:"Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 12/07/2006 from Bridget Prentice MP to Oliver Heald MP and Simon Hughes MP regarding points raised during the Electoral Administration Bill debate on 28th June 2006.

Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
12 July 2006
Reference
DEP 06/1450
House
House of Commons

Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06. Royal assent notified 11 July 2006. CHAP 22 2006

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
448 c1310
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
11 July 2006
Reference
CHAP 22 2006

Electoral Administration Bill. Consideration of Commons reason. Debate on motion that House do not insist on its amendment 8b to which Commons have disagreed. Agreed to on question.

Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c479-83
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill does much to improve the quality of electoral administration in this country and will therefore make a significant contribution to improving the health of our democracy. It makes significant improvements to electoral legislation as we left it in 2000. We have clearly all learnt lessons since...

Member
Lord Rennard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c483
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons reason be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to HL Bill 58 as first printed for the Lords.]"8B: Before Clause 13, insert the following new clause—" ““Registration: personal identifiers (1) The...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c479-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I find myself back in a familiar place. Indeed, I am reminded of Sisyphus, who was condemned by the gods to roll a rock up a mountain, only for the stone to fall back on its own weight—a punishment of futile and hopeless labour. The hopeless labour has...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c481-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 8B, to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 8C. As I have mentioned in previous debates, the Government accept the principle behind your Lordships’ amendment for individual registration, but we believe...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c481
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, and others for the enormous effort that they have made on this legislation. We should be of good cheer—it is a good Bill. I know that we have to do more, but we...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 July 2006
Reference
684 c483
House
House of Lords

If the Bill were to be passed in the near future—I share the Minister’s wish that it is—but with the Lords amendment included, can the Minister confirm that that would not delay the implementation and that we could still use it for next year’s elections?

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

I am not sure that I can give that confirmation. As I mentioned in reference to the postal vote identifier, which will cover 12 to 15 per cent. of the electorate, the work that has to be done by the EROs and the administrators in order to get things up...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons

I am usually reluctant to intervene on the hon. Gentleman in his opening remarks, but that is the second time in this debate that he has used the banana republic example. That was the 2004 election and, after that, we put in place a number of measures to secure the...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c297
House
House of Commons

I congratulate Baroness Hanham on her success in prevailing again in the other place. The background to our first debate in October was the widespread electoral fraud in Birmingham, which had led a judge to say that the systematic fraud there"““would disgrace a banana republic””."

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c297
House
House of Commons

What about the possible situation of merchant seamen in my constituency, who might be away for voyages of five months and then find themselves coming home just before an election? How would the proposal for signatures affect those kinds of people?

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend accept that, in any case, in such circumstances an electoral registration officer could take a view on that and dispense with the requirement? That is part of the amendment.

Member
Bob Spink (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

The people whom the hon. Gentleman represents would register to vote in October, I imagine, as others do. At the moment, they do not have to provide a signature at that point; in future, they would. When they voted, they would also have to provide a signature, because that is...

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298
House
House of Commons

Just for the record, we are with the Government on the amendment.

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c299
House
House of Commons

Yes. I was not sure whether the hon. Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Mr. MacNeil) was suggesting that some of his constituents cannot sign their names, because clearly there would need to be provision for that, which is what we have suggested. I will continue with the long list....

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c298-9
House
House of Commons

We all know that sometimes contests are tight and that there can occasionally be grudge contests, such as the recent one in the east end of London. Must the ERO always investigate an allegation? One could envisage hundreds of challenges being made at the last minute because people realised that...

Member
Robert Syms (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c294
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes a valid point. I think we should allow for a variety of elections to take place so that we can have a fairly comprehensive view of the reaction to all the measures. I would not like to put a specific time on that, but I...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
448 c296
House
House of Commons