Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,556 results for legtitle:"European Union Referendum Bill 2015-16"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
DEP2017-0312
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Date
12 April 2016
Reference
HC 319 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
17 December 2015
Reference
CHAP 36 2015; 2015 c. 36

My Lords, I thought that the noble Lord did not think that we should be here. Indeed, he certainly does not think that I should be here.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1852
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Faulks

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 1, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 1A.

1: Clause 2, page 2, line 7, at end insert “and persons who would be so entitled except for the fact that they will be aged 16 or 17...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1841
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this afternoon we return to the question of the voting age. Since we last debated the Bill, only two weeks ago, it has been considered in the other place. It agreed to all of the amendments made by your Lordships, with the sole exception of Amendment 1, which...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 cc1841-3
House
House of Lords

The Minister knows that in Scotland in the Scottish referendum, 16 and 17 year-olds were allowed to vote. I spoke to many of them during the course of that referendum and found them intelligent, well-informed and exercising their right to vote with great enthusiasm and sense. Therefore, it was a...

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1843
House
House of Lords

I do not suggest that it was unsuccessful, nor do I for a moment cast aspersions on the intelligence of 16 and 17 year-olds in Scotland or in England and Wales. Enthusiasm is of course to be welcomed at any age. Equally, there may be 15 year-olds who are very...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1843
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister moves on from the point that the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, raised with regard to Scotland, he tries to give the impression that it was decided purely and solely by the devolved authority with no support. Can he remind the House whether the Prime Minister and the...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1843
House
House of Lords

With respect, whether the Prime Minister or the leader of the Conservative Party favoured a 16 year-old franchise is beside the point as to whether the Government think that it is appropriate in this referendum for those 18 and above to vote, in the traditional way of the franchise. I...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1844
House
House of Lords

I have a certain conceit over this matter, as I was the first Member of Parliament ever elected by 18 year-olds following the exact Act to which the noble Lord has referred. Is that not the model that we should follow? If we are going to change the voting age,...

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1844
House
House of Lords

I respectfully agree with my noble friend and, of course, the 18 year-olds showed excellent judgment on that occasion.

Finally, the House needs to consider very carefully the perception created by a change to the franchise. We speak of this as being a once-in-a-generation referendum. If that is really the case,...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 cc1844-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Morgan of Ely

Member
Baroness Morgan of Ely (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1845
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to move Motion A1. I start by thanking the noble Baroness the Minister and the noble Lord the Minister for their co-operation on this Bill. The Government have been in listening mode and have understood that the vote on whether we leave or remain a part...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Ely (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 cc1845-7
House
House of Lords

The reality is that the House of Commons has decided to invoke financial privilege—not that it is this or that amount. It has the right to invoke financial privilege and the actual amount is irrelevant to that right.

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1847
House
House of Lords

I do not think that the amount is irrelevant. One of the points that I will come on to is the threshold for invoking financial privilege. It is like a dark art: no one has any idea what it is and there is nothing written down anywhere. I will come...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Ely (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1847
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the noble Baroness, but is not the nub of the matter our saying to Members of the elected House that we know more than they know about what the franchise should be? We are even flying in the face, if we are misguided...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1848
House
House of Lords

Of course we understand that the other House has spoken on this issue, but it has also invoked financial privilege. I am trying to address the issue of costs in this amendment. The problem is that there is no threshold—or we do not know what it is. What does that...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Ely (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 cc1848-9
House
House of Lords

It was not this Government who did that; it was the coalition Government.

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1849
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords may laugh. But perhaps I may remind the noble Baroness that we are on very tricky ground. We are playing with the constitution and with the fact that we are not supposed to check on financial privilege. All this stuff we are getting now is of no relevance...

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 December 2015
Reference
767 c1849
House
House of Lords