Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for legtitle:"Land Registration (Network Access) Rules 2008"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I beg to move the two Motions standing in my name on the Order Paper. Moved, That the draft rules and regulations laid before the House on 5 March and 22 April be approved. 13th and 17th reports from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. Considered in Grand...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2008
Reference
701 c1559
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on land registration (network access). Draft SI on compensation (claims management services) (amendment). Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
22 May 2008
Reference
701 c1559
House
House of Lords

The Land Registry organisation requires fees to be paid, and I do not see why that is a problem. The registry is self-funding and makes no call on public funds to carry out its core business. The fees charged to customers prescribed by an order made by the Lord Chancellor...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c521-2GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Land Registration (Network Access) Rules 2008. The noble Lord said: These draft rules are an important building block in creating a system of electronic conveyancing in England and Wales, as envisaged by the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c515-7GC
House
House of Lords

The costs of introducing something of this sort will be huge. Is that really a burden to be carried forward by fees to infinity?

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c522GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his explanation of the order, which is quite straightforward. I do, however, have a number of questions to put to him that I hope he will be able to answer. First, we have some concern about security, but I am grateful for the fact that...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c517GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for those comments and for the general welcome for the rules, although I sense that the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, is rather suspicious of these modern methods. He prayed in aid the collapse of our system earlier this afternoon, which meant that we could not...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c519-21GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Henley, makes a good point about the electronic registration of existing entries on the register. I think that registration was introduced in 1925; certainly it was operative on a voluntary basis when I was engaged in conveyancing in the 1960s, and it was extended gradually over...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c517-9GC
House
House of Lords

No. Capital and development costs, which are expected to total between £270 million and £310 million, will be met from the Land Registry’s reserves. However, the operational costs once the network is up and running will be recovered from fee income. I think that that is a very reasonable way...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c522GC
House
House of Lords

While the noble Lord was talking, a suspicion grew in my mind that the whole of this exercise may be funded by fees as opposed to general taxation. What is the intention here? Will it be the consumers who bear the cost?

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c521GC
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord think that the Land Registry might in due course be able to reduce its fees by providing what he claims will be a more efficient service?

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c522GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is not going to tempt me down that route. What I will say is that it is clearly very important that a careful eye is kept on the costs of the Land Registry, for all the reasons that both noble Lords have given. I assure him that...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c522GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Land Registration (Network Access) Rules 2008. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath
Answering member
Lord Henley
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
20 May 2008
Reference
701 c515-22GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move the seven Motions standing in my name on the Order Paper. Moved, That the draft orders, regulations and rules be referred to a Grand Committee.—(Baroness Ashton of Upholland.) On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c326
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on parliamentary constituencies (Northern Ireland). Draft SI on mutilations (permitted procedures) (England) (amendment). Draft SI on building societies (financial assistance). Draft SI on Building Societies Act 1986 (accounts audit and EEA state amendments). Draft SI on cash ratio deposits (value bands and ratios). Draft SI on land registration...

Lead member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
1 May 2008
Reference
701 c326
House
House of Lords

Draft Land Registration (Network Access) Rules 2008. Motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
21 April 2008
Reference
474 c1159
House
House of Commons

Draft Land Registration (Network Access) Rules 2008. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee. Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2007-08.

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
2 April 2008
Reference
3rd DLC
House
House of Commons

Draft SI on land registration (network access). (Affirmative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Ministry of Justice. Approved by Parliament. Made 2 July 2008 (SI 2008/1748). Coming into force the day after the rules are made.

Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
5 March 2008
Reference
SI 2008/1748
House
House of Commons; House of Lords