Skip to main content

1-20 of 505 results for legtitle:"Pensions Act 2011"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has investigated the communication of State Pension age increases to women born in the 1950s.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
14 March 2025
Reference
CBP-9967

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the (a) Pensions Act 1995 and (b) Pensions Act 2011 on women.

Asked by
Paula Barker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2025
Reference
26517
House
House of Commons

Motion, That this House has considered compensation for women affected by state pension changes. Motion lapsed.

Lead member
Jim Shannon
Answering member
Paul Maynard
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Backbench debates
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 cc11-38WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered compensation for women affected by state pension changes.

I thank each and every Member who has come to speak in the debate, and I am greatly encouraged that they have, as are those from the Women Against State Pension Inequality Campaign in the...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c11WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for securing the debate and for the great work he is doing. Unfortunately, Sir Gary, I have to leave early, so I will not be making a speech. The hon. Member said that the so-called WASPI women “argue” that they were not properly advised and...

Member
Peter Aldous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c11WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that, and he is absolutely right. I will come to that point and confirm it. The issue is all about fairness and equality, but, with respect to the Minister and the Government, they have fallen down on that.

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c11WH
House
House of Commons

I too congratulate my hon. Friend and colleague on securing the debate. He is a champion for women on this issue not only in his constituency but across the UK. Does he, like me, feel that last week’s Budget was a complete and total missed opportunity? The Government could have...

Member
Ian Jnr Paisley (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c11WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend and colleague is absolutely right, which is why we are all here to make that case.

The WASPI women claim that the issue has caused them financial hardship, emotional distress and health problems. Many have had to work longer than expected, rely on benefits or use their savings...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c12WH
House
House of Commons

I too thank the hon. Member for securing the debate. Some 8,000 WASPI women live in my constituency, and many have been in touch with me. They are at their wits’ end and do not know how they will manage financially—one constituent told me that they have had to sell...

Member
Sarah Dyke (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c12WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely, and we all say hear, hear to that.

The WASPI women also contend that they have been discriminated against on the grounds of sex and age and that they have been disproportionately impacted by the changes, compared with men and younger women. On behalf of those in the audience today,...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c12WH
House
House of Commons

I too commend the hon. Gentleman on securing this really important debate. He puts his finger on the nub of the unfairness here: it was not just one Pensions Act that affected these women; many were subsequently affected by a further Pensions Act in 2011, so they were hit twice...

Member
Andrew Gwynne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c12WH
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Sir Gary. I wholeheartedly agree with the hon. Gentleman. Yes, there is maladministration, and I will use that word again shortly.

Many of the women concerned may not have been actively engaged with Government or have had knowledge of or access to Government publications. In that case, how could...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 cc12-3WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing the debate and on his powerful opening speech. I am sure he will agree that it is important that we get on the record from the Minister today that the Department for Work and Pensions accepts the findings in the stage 1 report...

Member
Amy Callaghan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c13WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that intervention. Everybody’s interventions so far have added to the debate and reinforced the issue.

Back when ladies started to work, there were no remunerated childcare schemes and it was not standard practice for ladies to be offered access to work pension schemes.

With all due...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 cc13-4WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for the speech he has made so far. People have been waiting three years since the report he has just outlined. Does he agree that justice delayed is justice denied and that the Government should, as the hon. Member for North Antrim (Ian Paisley) said,...

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c14WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for that, and he is right: there is a real onus on Government to reach out and help.

The PHSO also found that the DWP had not given due regard to the impact of the changes on women’s lives and had not offered women adequate support...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 cc14-5WH
House
House of Commons

I join the chorus of congratulations to the hon. Gentleman for organising this debate. Like many here, he will have constituents who are starting to receive draft reports from the ombudsman about the second report, which will trigger the payment of the restitution he just mentioned. Obviously, they are in...

Member
John Penrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c15WH
House
House of Commons

I do agree with that. The Minister is obviously taking copious notes, and the civil servants have not had their heads up since the debate started, so I suspect and hope that they will have the answers we need.

The Government must adopt a flexible and tailored approach to restitution, based...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 cc15-6WH
House
House of Commons

I was hesitating before intervening on the hon. Gentleman—

Member
Peter Aldous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c16WH
House
House of Commons

I have not finished.

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2024
Reference
747 c16WH
House
House of Commons