Letter dated November 2002 from Bob Ainsworth MP to Nigel Dodds MP regarding the Assets Recovery branch in Northern Ireland. HO. 2002.

Letter dated November 2002 from Bob Ainsworth MP to Nigel Dodds MP regarding the Assets Recovery branch in Northern Ireland. HO. 2002.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Royal Assent notified. CHAP 29 2002.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Royal Assent notified. CHAP 29 2002.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments 4B to 4H,4J,4K,43B to 43H,43J,43K,73B to 73D and 110B in lieu agreed to.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments 4B to 4H,4J,4K,43B to 43H,43J,43K,73B to 73D and 110B in lieu agreed to.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Returned earlier from the Commons with the Lords amendments in lieu of certain Lords amendments to which the Commons had disagreed agreed to without amendment.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Returned earlier from the Commons with the Lords amendments in lieu of certain Lords amendments to which the Commons had disagreed agreed to without amendment.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Commons amendments and reasons considered, certain Lords amendments not insisted on and amendments in lieu agreed to. Remaining Lords amendments not insisted on. Returned to the Commons with amendments.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Commons amendments and reasons considered, certain Lords amendments not insisted on and amendments in lieu agreed to. Remaining Lords amendments not insisted on. Returned to the Commons with amendments.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Debate on money resolution (no 2) relating to the Assets Recovery Agency, agreed to on question. Programme motion (no 3) on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent proceedings agreed to on question (formal). Lords amendments considered. Amendments 1-3,5-8,10-29,31-37,38 agreed to. Amendments 4,9,30,43,47,66,73,78,99,110,113,166 disagreed to. Remaining amendments agreed to. Committee appointed to draw up reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to certain of their amendments. Reasons reported and agreed to. To be communicated to the Lords. (Relevant docs HC 628 and HC 978-I)

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Debate on money resolution (no 2) relating to the Assets Recovery Agency, agreed to on question. Programme motion (no 3) on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent proceedings agreed to on question (formal). Lords amendments considered. Amendments 1-3,5-8,10-29,31-37,38 agreed to. Amendments 4,9,30,43,47,66,73,78,99,110,113,166 disagreed to. Remaining amendments...

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Returned from the Commons with certain amendments disagreed to with reasons for such disagreement and with the remaining amendment agreed to. Reasons ordered to be printed (HL Bill 106 2001/02).

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Returned from the Commons with certain amendments disagreed to with reasons for such disagreement and with the remaining amendment agreed to. Reasons ordered to be printed (HL Bill 106 2001/02).

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords third reading and debate on amendments. Passed on question and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords third reading and debate on amendments. Passed on question and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Letter dated 08.07.2002 from Lord Falconer of Thoroton to Baroness Buscombe regarding amendments tabled for the Third Reading of the Proceeds of Crime Bill. HO. 2002.

Letter dated 08.07.2002 from Lord Falconer of Thoroton to Baroness Buscombe regarding amendments tabled for the Third Reading of the Proceeds of Crime Bill. HO. 2002.

Letters dated 20.06.2002 from Lord Falconer of Thoroton to Lord Goodhart, Lord Craig of Radley and Baroness Buscombe regarding amendments to parts 1,3,8 and 9 of the Proceeds of Crime Bill providing explanations of each. HO. 2002.

Letters dated 20.06.2002 from Lord Falconer of Thoroton to Lord Goodhart, Lord Craig of Radley and Baroness Buscombe regarding amendments to parts 1,3,8 and 9 of the Proceeds of Crime Bill providing explanations of each. HO. 2002.

Whether the offence of people trafficking contained in Schedule 2, paragraph 3 to the Proceeds of Crime Bill is adequate to combat people trafficking in its various guises. [HL 4798].

Whether the offence of people trafficking contained in Schedule 2, paragraph 3 to the Proceeds of Crime Bill is adequate to combat people trafficking in its various guises. [HL 4798].

Whether it is their intention to amend Schedule 2, paragraph 3, of the Proceeds of Crime Bill (people trafficking) when the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill is enacted to incorporate the new offence of people trafficking as defined in that Bill. [HL 4797].

Whether it is their intention to amend Schedule 2, paragraph 3, of the Proceeds of Crime Bill (people trafficking) when the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill is enacted to incorporate the new offence of people trafficking as defined in that Bill. [HL 4797].

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords report stage first day. Concluded. (HL Bill 97 2001/02)

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords report stage first day. Concluded. (HL Bill 97 2001/02)

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords motion on order in which amendments for the Report stage be marshalled and considered. Agreed to on question (formal).

Proceeds of Crime Bill. Lords motion on order in which amendments for the Report stage be marshalled and considered. Agreed to on question (formal).

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, If he will make a statement on the impact in Northern Ireland of the Proceeds of Crime Bill. - Ref my honourable Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Harlow. (Failed OPQ).

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, If he will make a statement on the impact in Northern Ireland of the Proceeds of Crime Bill. - Ref my honourable Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Harlow. (Failed OPQ).