Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,180 results for legtitle:"Public Order Bill 2022-23"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 24 April 2023 to Question 179976 on Demonstrations, what steps her Department is taking to ensure any public order guidance related to buffer zones is compatible with existing rights to freedom of (a) speech, (b)...

Asked by
Eddie Hughes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2023
Reference
189991
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
2 May 2023
Reference
CHAP 15 2023; 2023 c. 15
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
2 May 2023
Reference
829 c1391
House
House of Lords
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
2 May 2023
Reference
732 c1
House
House of Commons

Lords consideration of Commons reason. Lords amendments 6H and 6J not insisted on.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 cc1217-1221
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Sharpe of Epsom

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 c1217
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for their engagement throughout the passage of this Bill. As I have already said, the Bill has undoubtedly received the scrutiny that the British people would want and expect, and it is only right to acknowledge that, through the scrutiny of this Chamber,...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 cc1217-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister said that there is only one disagreement remaining. He was, of course, referring formally to what the House as a whole disagrees about; but we on these Benches have opposed police stop and search in relation to protest from day one, as any stop and search...

Member
Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 cc1218-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and the noble Lord, Lord Paddick, and many others for the detailed scrutiny and the way this Chamber has tried to hold the Government to account. To be fair, the Government have made one or two changes with respect to suspicionless...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 cc1219-1221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not detain your Lordships by repeating my profound concerns about this Bill at a time when peaceful protest is under attack all over the world, and policing is in such a parlous state in our own country. I must thank all noble Lords who supported the...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 c1221
House
House of Lords

Just for the record, I am absolutely furious about the Bill. I think the Government have panicked. It is unworthy of any Government who think freedom of speech is important. Shame on you all.

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 c1221
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank almost all noble Lords for their contributions to another fruitful debate. As I have already said, there is no doubt that the Bill received the scrutiny it deserves. I will not go on at great length, but noble Lords have raised the subject of the Casey...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
829 c1221
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans she has to issue guidance on the new buffer zone provision in the Public Order Bill.

Asked by
Scott Benton (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
179976
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House disagrees with Lords amendments 6H and 6J.

The Public Order Bill is about giving the police the tools they need to tackle the highly disruptive protest tactics we have seen in recent months, and indeed today, which have blocked ambulances, delayed passengers making important journeys,...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 cc546-7
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak against the Government’s motion to disagree with Lords amendments 6H and 6J, which we support.

The amendments seek to do two things: first, to instruct officers to give their name, badge number and reason for stopping anyone they search under the new suspicionless stop-and-search powers, and secondly,...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 cc547-8
House
House of Commons

Why do the Opposition object to implementing some of the key elements of the Lords amendments in PACE code A, where most regulations relating to this issue already sit? They can be updated relatively easily if necessary, so is not PACE code A the right place to do this? In...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 c548
House
House of Commons

My understanding is that the agreement to include some aspects of the amendments in PACE code A does not go the whole way towards what we are suggesting in this legislation. The attitude from the Government—that plenty of long-established safeguards already exist, as the Minister said at the start of...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 cc548-9
House
House of Commons

I find myself, I am afraid, in agreement with the Opposition spokesperson. I also support the Casey recommendations, based as they were on a horrifying report about the behaviour of the Met over the years. Let us be clear: no Government of any persuasion have managed to get the Met...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 cc549-550
House
House of Commons

I, too, rise to speak in support of the Lords amendments. These are amendments about suspicionless stop and search, and we need to draw a breath and remind ourselves that suspicionless stop and search really is a significant power. It is a hugely invasive, intrusive and arbitrary police tactic that...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 cc550-1
House
House of Commons

I return to trust, which is the basis of policing by consent. We need trust in the police, not just so that when people pick up the phone they get assistance, but from an intelligence perspective as well. One concern that I have had consistently throughout the debate on the...

Member
Wendy Chamberlain (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2023
Reference
731 c551
House
House of Commons