Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,790 results for legtitle:"Recall of MPs Bill 2014-15"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
2015 c. 25; CHAP 25 2015
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1686
House
House of Commons
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
760 cc1589-1590
House
House of Lords

Lords amendments 1-17 and 19 to 32 agreed to. Lords amendment 18 agreed to, with Commons financial privileges waived.

Lead member
Sam Gyimah
Answering member
Stephen Twigg
Department
Department for Education
Type
Debates on bills
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1333-1341
House
House of Commons

Returned from the Commons with the Lords amendments agreed to.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
760 cc1409-1412
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Sam Gyimah (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1334
House
House of Commons

The amendments in this group relate to the circumstances that would trigger a recall petition. They were tabled by the Government in the House of Lords to ensure that the important changes made to the Bill in this House are reflected throughout the Bill, ensuring that the legislation works in...

Member
Sam Gyimah (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1334-5
House
House of Commons

We welcome and support these Lords amendments. On Report, it was a Labour amendment that added a third recall condition of conviction for an offence under section 10 of the 2009 Act, so we particularly welcome these amendments from the other place. As the Minister said, they are minor and...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1335
House
House of Commons

I rise to support the amendments, such as they are, from the House of Lords. They clearly strengthen the Bill in a minor way. Members may recall that we expended a fair amount of time and effort trying to strengthen the Bill in a more concrete way when it was...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1335-6
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, Madam Deputy Speaker, let me say, as I said in my opening remarks, that these amendments are sensible modifications, ensuring that the Bill works effectively. I hope the House will support them, I am grateful for the Opposition spokesman’s comments on them and I...

Member
Sam Gyimah (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1336
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 18.

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1336
House
House of Commons

The amendments in this group relate to the way in which recall petitions will be run. They pick up on a number of points made in debates in both Houses and are designed to make improvements to the operation of the recall petitions for the benefit of constituents, administrators and...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1336-8
House
House of Commons

I have listened with great interest to what the Minister has to say. Does not Lords amendment 19, which reduces the period during which the recall petition would be available for signing from eight to six weeks, make it far more likely that an MP under the recall mechanism is...

Member
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1338
House
House of Commons

We had to strike a balance between the number of signing places and the number of weeks that a petition was available. We felt that, following the discussions that had taken place in both Houses, the idea of providing a maximum of 10 signing places and allowing six weeks was...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1338
House
House of Commons

In the Minister’s opening remarks, he coupled Lords amendment 18 with Lords amendment 19. Would it not be better for Lords amendment 18 to say a “minimum” of 10 rather than a maximum of 10?

Member
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1338
House
House of Commons

That is a subject of debate. If the returning officer in the constituency of Argyll and Bute, which has, I think, more islands than any other constituency, felt that 10 signing places was appropriate, it is difficult to envisage circumstances in which more than 10 would be required anywhere else...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1338-9
House
House of Commons

Let me start by apologising to the House, particularly to the right hon. Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr Heath), that I was a little ahead of myself in addressing amendments 23 to 25, which are in the second grouping. I echo what the Deputy Leader of the House said...

Member
Stephen Twigg (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1339-1340
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, Madam Deputy Speaker. The amendments follow thorough scrutiny in both Houses and will improve the operation of recall petitions by encouraging participation and ensuring public confidence in the outcome. I thank hon. Members on both sides of the House for their constructive scrutiny of...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c1340
House
House of Commons
Member
Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Government bills
Notes
Royal assent received.
Date
3 March 2015
Reference
Bill 182 2014-15
House
House of Commons

Lords third reading. Amendments 4 and 6-10 agreed to on question. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Type
Debates on bills
Date
2 March 2015
Reference
760 cc14-40
House
House of Lords